Copy number variant discrepancy resolution using the ClinGen dosage sensitivity map results in updated clinical interpretations in ClinVar

Conflict resolution in genomic variant interpretation is a critical step toward improving patient care. Evaluating interpretation discrepancies in copy number variants (CNVs) typically involves assessing overlapping genomic content with focus on genes/regions that may be subject to dosage sensitivity (haploinsufficiency (HI) and/or triplosensitivity (TS)). CNVs containing dosage sensitive genes/regions are generally interpreted as “likely pathogenic” (LP) or “pathogenic” (P), and CNVs involving the same known dosage sensitive gene(s) should receive the same clinical interpretation. We compared the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) Dosage Map, a publicly available resource documenting known HI and TS genes/regions, against germline, clinical CNV interpretations within the ClinVar database. We identified 251 CNVs overlapping known dosage sensitive genes/regions but not classified as LP or P; these were sent back to their original submitting laboratories for re‐evaluation. Of 246 CNVs re‐evaluated, an updated clinical classification was warranted in 157 cases (63.8%); no change was made to the current classification in 79 cases (32.1%); and 10 cases (4.1%) resulted in other types of updates to ClinVar records. This effort will add curated interpretation data into the public domain and allow laboratories to focus attention on more complex discrepancies.

[1]  Insuk Lee,et al.  Characterising and Predicting Haploinsufficiency in the Human Genome , 2010, PLoS genetics.

[2]  Heidi L Rehm,et al.  ClinGen--the Clinical Genome Resource. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  Matthew S. Lebo,et al.  Technical Standards and Guidelines for Use of Clinical Genomic Microarray Analysis in Hematopoietic and Other Neoplastic Disorders: A Draft From a Working Group of the American College of Medical Genetics Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee , 2011 .

[4]  David Haussler,et al.  Consistency of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Classifications Among Clinical Diagnostic Laboratories , 2017, JCO precision oncology.

[5]  S. Schwartz,et al.  Variability in interpreting and reporting copy number changes detected by array-based technology in clinical laboratories , 2009, Genetics in Medicine.

[6]  Swaroop Aradhya,et al.  An evidence-based approach to establish the functional and clinical significance of copy number variants in intellectual and developmental disabilities , 2011, Genetics in Medicine.

[7]  John A. Sweeney,et al.  Genome-Wide Analyses of Exonic Copy Number Variants in a Family-Based Study Point to Novel Autism Susceptibility Genes , 2009, PLoS genetics.

[8]  D. Conrad,et al.  Recurrent 16p11.2 microdeletions in autism. , 2007, Human molecular genetics.

[9]  Joshua M. Korn,et al.  Association between microdeletion and microduplication at 16p11.2 and autism. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  Evan E. Eichler,et al.  A Genotype-First Approach to Defining the Subtypes of a Complex Disease , 2014, Cell.

[11]  S. Scherer,et al.  Molecular characterization of NRXN1 deletions from 19,263 clinical microarray cases identifies exons important for neurodevelopmental disease expression , 2016, Genetics in Medicine.

[12]  Laurent Mottron,et al.  Truncating mutations in NRXN2 and NRXN1 in autism spectrum disorders and schizophrenia , 2011, Human Genetics.

[13]  Bale,et al.  Standards and Guidelines for the Interpretation of Sequence Variants: A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology , 2015, Genetics in Medicine.

[14]  J. Rosenfeld,et al.  Defining the Effect of the 16p11.2 Duplication on Cognition, Behavior, and Medical Comorbidities. , 2016, JAMA psychiatry.

[15]  Soma Das,et al.  Clinical Laboratories Collaborate to Resolve Differences in Variant Interpretations Submitted to ClinVar , 2017, Genetics in Medicine.

[16]  E. Thorland,et al.  Towards an evidence‐based process for the clinical interpretation of copy number variation , 2012, Clinical genetics.

[17]  Thomas Bourgeron,et al.  Mapping autism risk loci using genetic linkage and chromosomal rearrangements , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[18]  Madhuri Hegde,et al.  Reassessment of Genomic Sequence Variation to Harmonize Interpretation for Personalized Medicine. , 2016, American journal of human genetics.

[19]  Matthew J. Huentelman,et al.  The Autism Genome Project , 2005, American journal of pharmacogenomics : genomics-related research in drug development and clinical practice.

[20]  James Y. Zou Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans , 2015, Nature.

[21]  A. Singleton,et al.  Rare Structural Variants Disrupt Multiple Genes in Neurodevelopmental Pathways in Schizophrenia , 2008, Science.

[22]  Tom R. Gaunt,et al.  Copy number variations and cognitive phenotypes in unselected populations. , 2015, JAMA.

[23]  Chubing Zeng,et al.  Developmental trajectories for young children with 16p11.2 copy number variation , 2017, American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics.

[24]  J. R. MacDonald,et al.  A copy number variation map of the human genome , 2015, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[25]  S. Scherer,et al.  Indexing Effects of Copy Number Variation on Genes Involved in Developmental Delay , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[26]  Yiping Shen,et al.  Deletions of NRXN1 (Neurexin-1) Predispose to a Wide Spectrum of Developmental Disorders , 2010, American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics.

[27]  Kali T. Witherspoon,et al.  Refining analyses of copy number variation identifies specific genes associated with developmental delay , 2014, Nature Genetics.

[28]  D. Goldstein,et al.  Genic Intolerance to Functional Variation and the Interpretation of Personal Genomes , 2013, PLoS genetics.

[29]  Gregory M. Cooper,et al.  A Copy Number Variation Morbidity Map of Developmental Delay , 2011, Nature Genetics.

[30]  Christian R Marshall,et al.  Phenotypic spectrum associated with de novo and inherited deletions and duplications at 16p11.2 in individuals ascertained for diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder , 2009, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[31]  Adam J. Schwarz,et al.  CNVs conferring risk of autism or schizophrenia affect cognition in controls , 2013, Nature.

[32]  Leslie G Biesecker,et al.  Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies. , 2010, American journal of human genetics.

[33]  J. Rosenfeld,et al.  Defining the Effect of the 16 p 11 . 2 Duplication on Cognition , Behavior , andMedical Comorbidities , 2015 .

[34]  Michael J. Owen,et al.  Cognitive Performance Among Carriers of Pathogenic Copy Number Variants: Analysis of 152,000 UK Biobank Subjects , 2017, Biological Psychiatry.

[35]  Joshua M. Korn,et al.  Association between microdeletion and microduplication at 16p11.2 and autism , 2008 .

[36]  S. South,et al.  American College of Medical Genetics standards and guidelines for interpretation and reporting of postnatal constitutional copy number variants , 2011, Genetics in Medicine.

[37]  Qixuan Chen,et al.  16p11.2 deletion and duplication: Characterizing neurologic phenotypes in a large clinically ascertained cohort , 2016, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[38]  Lars Feuk,et al.  The Database of Genomic Variants: a curated collection of structural variation in the human genome , 2013, Nucleic Acids Res..

[39]  Daniele Merico,et al.  Brain-expressed exons under purifying selection are enriched for de novo mutations in autism spectrum disorder , 2014, Nature Genetics.

[40]  Keith Nykamp,et al.  Sources of discordance among germ-line variant classifications in ClinVar , 2017, Genetics in Medicine.

[41]  H. Mefford Genotype to phenotype—discovery and characterization of novel genomic disorders in a “genotype-first” era , 2009, Genetics in Medicine.

[42]  Deanna M. Church,et al.  ClinVar: public archive of relationships among sequence variation and human phenotype , 2013, Nucleic Acids Res..