Muscle-based perception: theory, research and implications for rehabilitation

INTRODUCAO: A percepcao muscular das propriedades espaciais dos membros restringe o padrao, periodo e magnitude das forcas exercidas durante a execucao de atividades motoras. A importância central da percepcao muscular, tanto para acoes rotineiras quanto para acoes especializadas, merece atencao da comunidade envolvida na area de reabilitacao, uma vez que alteracoes em suas funcoes podem estar relacionadas a importantes limitacoes funcionais. Nesta revisao, os autores apresentam um resumo da pesquisa que pode ser utilizada para guiar o desenvolvimento de ferramentas de avaliacao eficazes bem como programas de reabilitacao que sejam especificamente direcionados para estas disfuncoes. OBJETIVOS: Quatro pontos especificos foram incluidos: primeiro, a apresentacao da abordagem com base em informacoes relativas a percepcao muscular de acordo com as leis da fisica; segundo, a identificacao dos principios centrais determinantes da percepcao muscular que vem sendo revelada e apoiada por trabalhos empiricos; terceiro, um resumo dos relatos que investigaram e se os principios identificados poderiam ser generalizados para a percepcao muscular dos individuos com alteracoes motoras e sensitivas; e quarto, uma discussao preliminar sobre as implicacoes potenciais da pesquisa aqui apresentada, no tocante aos assuntos relacionados a reabilitacao.

[1]  M T Turvey,et al.  Role of the inertia tensor in haptically perceiving where an object is grasped. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  M. Turvey Action and perception at the level of synergies. , 2007, Human movement science.

[3]  M T Turvey,et al.  Dynamics of effortful touch and interlimb coordination. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Perceiving extents of rods by wielding: haptic diagonalization and decomposition of the inertia tensor. , 1989 .

[5]  T. Fukunaga,et al.  Effects of resistance and stretching training programmes on the viscoelastic properties of human tendon structures in vivo , 2002, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  J. Thomson,et al.  Studies in perception and action V , 1999 .

[7]  M. Turvey Dynamic touch. , 1996, The American psychologist.

[8]  A. Eliasson,et al.  Obstetric brachial plexus injuries: assessment protocol and functional outcome at age 5 years , 1998, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[9]  C. Carello,et al.  Mutuality in the perception of affordances and the control of movement. , 2009, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[10]  R. Mackel,et al.  Sensorimotor performance of the hand during peripheral nerve regeneration , 1987, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[11]  C. Maganaris,et al.  Strength training alters the viscoelastic properties of tendons in elderly humans , 2003, Muscle & nerve.

[12]  J. Thornbury,et al.  Tactile sensitivity as a function of age. , 1981, Journal of gerontology.

[13]  Peter J Beek,et al.  Mechanical invariants are implicated in dynamic touch as a function of their salience in the stimulus flow. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  M T Turvey,et al.  Role of the inertia tensor in perceiving object orientation by dynamic touch. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  Steven J. Harrison,et al.  Comparison of Dynamic (Effortful) Touch by Hand and Foot , 2007, Journal of motor behavior.

[16]  P. Rack,et al.  Reflex responses at the human ankle: the importance of tendon compliance. , 1983, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  J. C. van der Wal,et al.  The organization of the substrate of proprioception in the elbow region of the rat , 1988 .

[18]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Effortful touch with minimal movement , 1992 .

[19]  Michael F. Shlesinger,et al.  Dynamic patterns in complex systems , 1988 .

[20]  Aileen B. Sedman,et al.  A longitudinal study , 1987 .

[21]  C C Pagano,et al.  The role of the inertia tensor in kinesthesis. , 2000, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[22]  M T Turvey,et al.  Haptically perceiving the distances reachable with hand-held objects. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  S. Wolf,et al.  Assessing Wolf Motor Function Test as Outcome Measure for Research in Patients After Stroke , 2001, Stroke.

[24]  An index of spindle efficacy obtained by measuring electroneurographic activity and passive tension in the rat soleus muscle , 2006, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[25]  Peter J Beek,et al.  Which mechanical invariants are associated with the perception of length and heaviness of a nonvisible handheld rod? Testing the inertia tensor hypothesis. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  Dagmar Sternad,et al.  Progress in Motor Control :A Multidisciplinary Perspective , 2009 .

[27]  D. Ingber Tensegrity I. Cell structure and hierarchical systems biology , 2003, Journal of Cell Science.

[28]  E L Amazeen,et al.  Perceptual independence of size and weight by dynamic touch. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  P. Huijing Muscular Force Transmission Necessitates a Multilevel Integrative Approach to the Analysis of Function of Skeletal Muscle , 2003, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[30]  D. Ingber Tensegrity II. How structural networks influence cellular information processing networks , 2003, Journal of Cell Science.

[31]  C. B. Wynn Parry,et al.  Evaluation of sensibility and re-education of sensation in the hand , 1982 .

[32]  S. Fonseca,et al.  Proprioception in Individuals with ACL-Deficient Knee and Good Muscular and Functional Performance , 2005, Research in sports medicine.

[33]  R. Katzman.,et al.  The neurology of aging , 1983 .

[34]  Eric L. Amazeen,et al.  Peripheral neuropathy and object length perception by effortful (dynamic) touch: A case study , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.

[35]  L. Sperling,et al.  Muscle function in 75-year-old men and women. A longitudinal study. , 1983, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine. Supplement.

[36]  M. Turvey,et al.  Eigenvalues of the inertia tensor and exteroception by the “muscular sense” , 1994, Neuroscience.

[37]  Michael T Turvey,et al.  Nature of motor control: perspectives and issues. , 2009, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[38]  N. Yozbatiran,et al.  A Standardized Approach to Performing the Action Research Arm Test , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[39]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Haptically Perceiving the Length of One Rod by Means of Another , 1996 .

[40]  Jeffrey B Wagman,et al.  Haptically creating affordances: the user-tool interface. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[41]  M T Turvey,et al.  Spatial and physical frames of reference in positioning a limb , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[42]  D. Ingber,et al.  Cellular mechanotransduction: putting all the pieces together again , 2006, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[43]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Aging and the perception of a racket's sweet spot , 2000 .

[44]  Further Evidence of Perceptual Independence (Specificity) in Dynamic Touch , 1999 .

[45]  C. Kallman,et al.  Evaluation of functional sensation in the hand. , 1983, The Journal of hand surgery.

[46]  P J Dyck,et al.  A quantitative study of Meissner's corpuscles in man , 1966, Neurology.

[47]  E. Moberg,et al.  Objective methods for determining the functional value of sensibility in the hand. , 1958, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[48]  Christopher C. Pagano,et al.  Is Limb Proprioception a Function of the Limbs' Intertial Eigenvectors? , 1996 .

[49]  M T Turvey,et al.  Perceiving the Sweet Spot , 1999, Perception.

[50]  Claudia Carello,et al.  Haptic selective attention by foot and by hand , 2007, Neuroscience Letters.

[51]  M T Turvey,et al.  Perceiving extents of rods by wielding: haptic diagonalization and decomposition of the inertia tensor. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[52]  Peter J Beek,et al.  The perception of limb orientation depends on the center of mass. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[53]  P. Huijing INTRA-, EXTRA- AND INTERMUSCULAR MYOFASCIAL FORCE TRANSMISION OF SYNERGISTS AND ANTAGONISTS: EFFECTS OF MUSCLE LENGTH AS WELL AS RELATIVE POSITION , 2002 .

[54]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Physics and Psychology of the Muscle Sense , 2004 .

[55]  M T Turvey,et al.  Tensorial basis to the constancy of perceived object extent over variations of dynamic touch , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[56]  C Carello,et al.  Selective perception by dynamic touch , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[57]  Christopher C. Pagano,et al.  Eigenvectors of the Inertia Tensor and Perceiving the Orientations of Limbs and Objects , 1998 .

[58]  Christopher C. Pagano,et al.  SPINORS AND SELECTIVE DYNAMIC TOUCH , 1996 .

[59]  D. Kenshalo Somesthetic sensitivity in young and elderly humans. , 1986, Journal of gerontology.

[60]  M. Turvey,et al.  The inertia tensor as a basis for the perception of limb orientation. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[61]  S. Levin THE TENSEGRITY-TRUSS AS A MODEL FOR SPINE MECHANICS: BIOTENSEGRITY , 2002 .

[62]  M T Turvey,et al.  Perceptual independence of whole length, partial length, and hand position in wielding a rod. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.