Return to basics: Clustering of scientific literature using structural information
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] E A Leicht,et al. Community structure in directed networks. , 2007, Physical review letters.
[2] Wolfgang Glänzel,et al. Using ‘core documents’ for the representation of clusters and topics , 2011, Scientometrics.
[3] Katherine W. McCain,et al. Visualizing a discipline: an author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995 , 1998 .
[4] Ronald Rousseau,et al. Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[5] Howard D. White,et al. Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure , 1981, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[6] Vincent A. Traag,et al. From Louvain to Leiden: guaranteeing well-connected communities , 2018, Scientific Reports.
[7] Kevin W. Boyack,et al. A principled methodology for comparing relatedness measures for clustering publications , 2019, ISSI.
[8] Kevin W. Boyack,et al. Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[9] Henry G. Small,et al. Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents , 1973, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[10] Kevin W. Boyack,et al. The Closer the Better: Similarity of Publication Pairs at Different Cocitation Levels , 2017, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[11] Katherine W. McCain,et al. Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview , 1990, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[12] Henry G. Small,et al. Update on science mapping: Creating large document spaces , 1997, Scientometrics.
[13] Carl T. Bergstrom,et al. The map equation , 2009, 0906.1405.
[14] D. Cases,et al. How can we investigate citation behavior?: a study of reasons for citing literature in communication , 2000 .
[15] Edgar Schiebel,et al. Do second-order similarities provide added-value in a hybrid approach? , 2013, Scientometrics.
[16] Yuxiao Dong,et al. A Review of Microsoft Academic Services for Science of Science Studies , 2019, Front. Big Data.
[17] Michael E. D. Koenig,et al. Journal clustering using a bibliographic coupling method , 1977, Inf. Process. Manag..
[18] Yves Gingras,et al. A new approach for detecting scientific specialties from raw cocitation networks , 2009 .
[19] Ludo Waltman,et al. A new methodology for constructing a publication-level classification system of science , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[20] Yong-Yeol Ahn,et al. CluSim: a python package for calculating clustering similarity , 2019, J. Open Source Softw..
[21] S. Morris,et al. Mapping research specialties , 2008 .
[22] Yi Bu,et al. Combining multiple scholarly relationships with author cocitation analysis: A preliminary exploration on improving knowledge domain mappings , 2017, J. Informetrics.
[23] Yu-Wei Chang,et al. Evolution of research subjects in library and information science based on keyword, bibliographical coupling, and co-citation analyses , 2015, Scientometrics.
[24] Henry G. Small,et al. Visualizing Science by Citation Mapping , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[25] M. M. Kessler,et al. An experimental study of bibliographic coupling between technical papers (Corresp.) , 1963, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.
[26] Patrick Wilson,et al. Unused Relevant Information in Research and Development , 1995, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[27] Howard D. White,et al. Author cocitation analysis and Pearson's r , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[28] Rey-Long Liu,et al. A new bibliographic coupling measure with descriptive capability , 2017, Scientometrics.
[29] Claudio Castellano,et al. Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[30] Dangzhi Zhao,et al. Evolution of research activities and intellectual influences in information science 1996–2005: Introducing author bibliographic-coupling analysis , 2008 .
[31] Mark E. J. Newman,et al. The Structure and Function of Complex Networks , 2003, SIAM Rev..
[32] M. M. Kessler. Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers , 1963 .
[33] Wolfgang Glänzel,et al. Same data—different results? Towards a comparative approach to the identification of thematic structures in science , 2017, Scientometrics.
[34] Sitaram Devarakonda,et al. Co-citation Analysis , 2019 .
[35] Charles F. F. Karney. Algorithms for geodesics , 2011, Journal of Geodesy.
[36] Ronald Rousseau,et al. Author cocitation analysis and Pearson's r , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[37] Allan P. White,et al. Technical Note: Bias in Information-Based Measures in Decision Tree Induction , 1994, Machine Learning.
[38] Kevin W. Boyack,et al. Which Type of Citation Analysis Generates the Most Accurate Taxonomy of Scientific and Technical Knowledge? , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[39] Yi-Cheng Zhang,et al. Bipartite network projection and personal recommendation. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.
[40] Grégoire Côté,et al. Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies , 2020, Quantitative Science Studies.
[41] Yong-Yeol Ahn,et al. Element-centric clustering comparison unifies overlaps and hierarchy , 2017, Scientific Reports.
[42] Yang Song,et al. An Overview of Microsoft Academic Service (MAS) and Applications , 2015, WWW.
[43] Wolfgang Glänzel,et al. Same data—different results? Towards a comparative approach to the identification of thematic structures in science , 2017, Scientometrics.
[44] Leon Danon,et al. Comparing community structure identification , 2005, cond-mat/0505245.
[45] Leo Egghe,et al. Co-citation, bibliographic coupling and a characterization of lattice citation networks , 2002, Scientometrics.
[46] Loet Leydesdorff,et al. Similarity Measures, Author Cocitation Analysis, and Information Theory , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[47] Wei Zhong Liu,et al. Bias in information-based measures in decision tree induction , 1994, Machine Learning.
[48] Stephen J. Bensman. Pearson's r and author cocitation analysis: A commentary on the controversy , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[49] Henry G. Small,et al. Clustering the science citation index using co-citations. II. Mapping science , 1985, Scientometrics.
[50] Wolfgang Glänzel,et al. Using ‘core documents’ for detecting and labelling new emerging topics , 2011, Scientometrics.
[51] Donald Owen Case,et al. How can we investigate citation behavior? A study of reasons for citing literature in communication , 2000, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[52] Per Ahlgren,et al. Experimental comparison of first and second-order similarities in a scientometric context , 2011, Scientometrics.
[53] Jean-Loup Guillaume,et al. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks , 2008, 0803.0476.
[54] Wolfgang Glänzel,et al. Using hybrid methods and ‘core documents’ for the representation of clusters and topics: the astronomy dataset , 2017, Scientometrics.