We consider two broad views of return comovement: the traditional view, derived from frictionless economies with rational investors, which attributes it to comovement in news about fundamental value, and an alternative view, in which market frictions or noise-trader sentiment delink it from comovement in fundamentals. Building on Vijh (1994), we use data on inclusions into the S&P 500 to distinguish these views. After inclusion, a stock's beta with the S&P goes up. In bivariate regressions which control for the return of non-S&P stocks, the increase in S&P beta is even larger. These results are generally stronger in more recent data. Our findings cannot easily be explained by the fundamentals-based view and provide new evidence in support of the alternative friction- or sentiment-based view.
[1]
E. Fama,et al.
Size and Book-to-Market Factors in Earnings and Returns
,
1995
.
[2]
Lawrence Harris,et al.
Price and Volume Effects Associated with Changes in the S&P 500 List: New Evidence for the Existence of Price Pressures
,
1986
.
[3]
R. Morck,et al.
Demand Curves for Stocks Do Slope Down: New Evidence from an Index Weights Adjustment
,
1999
.
[4]
Anand M. Vijh.
S&P 500 Trading Strategies and Stock Betas
,
1994
.
[5]
Richard R. Mendenhall,et al.
New Evidence on Stock Price Effects Associated with Charges in the S&P 500 Index
,
1996
.
[6]
Keith H. Black.
Index Funds and Stock Market Growth
,
2003
.
[7]
L. Summers,et al.
Noise Trader Risk in Financial Markets
,
1990,
Journal of Political Economy.