Short-Term Effects of an Intervention to Prevent Bullying on First-Grade Secondary School Children of Palermo, Italy: The "BIAS" Study

The Bullying in Sicilian School study aimed to investigate the prevalence of bullying and the short-term effects on the students’ perception of bullying after a preventive intervention conducted among teachers of first-grade secondary schools of Palermo, Sicily (Italy). Between the 2017/2018 and 2018/2019 school years, a pre-post intervention study was conducted among ten schools sampled and categorized by neighbourhood socio-economic index. A questionnaire investigating physical, verbal and indirect bullying, observers role, prosociality and resiliency in bullying phenomena was administered before and after a formative cascade-training intervention on teachers of the selected classes. 428 students participated the study (70.8% response rate). A decrease in the bullying episodes after the intervention carried out was reported by students in all areas explored. The verbal bullying was the one that demonstrated the most significant decrease, together with physical bullying and observer area. In particular, a statistically significant decrease was reported for students of schools with an intermediate socioeconomic level. The encouraging results obtained in reducing bullying episodes, together with its low cost of human and economic resources, could suggest the research extension on a regional/national scale.

[1]  Stuart Woodcock,et al.  Developing Wellbeing Through a Randomised Controlled Trial of a Martial Arts Based Intervention: An Alternative to the Anti-Bullying Approach , 2018, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[2]  D. Farrington,et al.  The Efficacy of the Tabby Improved Prevention and Intervention Program in Reducing Cyberbullying and Cybervictimization among Students , 2018, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[3]  A. Casuccio,et al.  Prevalence of the bullying phenomenon in a schools sample of Palermo, Sicily: a pre-post intervention observational study among teachers. , 2018, Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis.

[4]  A. Casuccio,et al.  THE BIAS (BULLYING IN SICILIAN SCHOOL) PILOT STUDY: INVESTIGATING THE PREVALENCE OF BULLYING IN SCHOOL OF PALERMO CITY. A RESEARCH STUDY PROTOCOL , 2017 .

[5]  S. Tye,et al.  How Well Do We Understand the Long-Term Health Implications of Childhood Bullying? , 2017, Harvard review of psychiatry.

[6]  Ersilia Menesini,et al.  Bullying in schools: the state of knowledge and effective interventions , 2017, Psychology, health & medicine.

[7]  E. Menesini,et al.  KiVa Anti-Bullying Program in Italy: Evidence of Effectiveness in a Randomized Control Trial , 2016, Prevention Science.

[8]  Anuradha J. Bakshi,et al.  Understanding school bullying: its nature and prevention strategies , 2016 .

[9]  Ersilia Menesini,et al.  Evidence-based intervention against bullying and cyberbullying: Evaluation of the NoTrap! program in two independent trials. , 2016, Aggressive behavior.

[10]  Catherine P. Bradshaw,et al.  The overlap between cyberbullying and traditional bullying. , 2015, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[11]  Jiun-Hau Huang,et al.  Precollege and In-College Bullying Experiences and Health-Related Quality of Life Among College Students , 2015, Pediatrics.

[12]  Sandra Graham,et al.  Bullying in schools: the power of bullies and the plight of victims. , 2014, Annual review of psychology.

[13]  T. Little,et al.  Effects of the KiVa Antibullying Program on Cyberbullying and Cybervictimization Frequency Among Finnish Youth , 2013, Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53.

[14]  David P. Farrington,et al.  School-Based Programs to Reduce Bullying and Victimization , 2012 .

[15]  D. Farrington,et al.  Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: a systematic and meta-analytic review , 2011 .

[16]  A. Roberto,et al.  Cyberbullying: Aggressive Communication in the Digital Age , 2010 .

[17]  G. Gini,et al.  Association Between Bullying and Psychosomatic Problems: A Meta-analysis , 2009, Pediatrics.

[18]  A. Tannahill Health promotion: the Tannahill model revisited. , 2008, Public health.

[19]  Peter K. Smith,et al.  Definitions of bullying: Age differences in understanding of the term, and the role of experience , 2006 .

[20]  Ton Vogels,et al.  Do Bullied Children Get Ill, or Do Ill Children Get Bullied? A Prospective Cohort Study on the Relationship Between Bullying and Health-Related Symptoms , 2006, Pediatrics.

[21]  J B Carlin,et al.  Does bullying cause emotional problems? A prospective study of young teenagers , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[22]  David Hayes,et al.  Cascade training and teachers' professional development , 2000 .

[23]  D. Olweus,et al.  Bullying in School , 2017 .

[24]  W. Mazzucco,et al.  VALUE-BASED EVIDENCES TO FACE THE NEW CHALLENGES OF HEALTH PROMOTION IN A SUSTAINABLE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM , 2017 .

[25]  M. Fraser,et al.  Family-Based Interventions in New Contexts Going Global: A Model for Evaluating Empirically Supported , 2013 .

[26]  H. A. Meyer,et al.  School Safety Interventions: Best Practices and Programs , 2005 .