Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin Moral Action? "... as You Would Have Them Do Unto You": Does Imagining Yourself in the Other's Place Stimulate

Philosophers, psychologists, and religious teachers have suggested that imagining yourself in another's place will stimulate moral action. The authors tested this idea in two different situations. In Experiment 1, participants had the opportunity to assign themselves and another research participant to tasks, with one task clearly more desirable than the other. Imagining oneself in the other's place did little to increase the morality (fair-ness) of the decision. A different form of perspective taking, imagining the other's feelings, increased direct assignment of the other to the desirable task, apparently due to increased empathy. In Experiment 2, participants confronted a different decision: either accept an initial task assignment that would give them highly positive consequences and the other participant nothing or change the assignment so they and the other would each receive moderately positive consequences. In this situation, imagining oneself in the other's place did significantly increase moral action.

[1]  Shalom H. Schwartz,et al.  Undermining intrinsic moral motivation: External reward and self-presentation. , 1983 .

[2]  C. Batson,et al.  Why Act for the Public Good? Four Answers , 1994 .

[3]  C. Batson,et al.  Perspective Taking: Imagining How Another Feels Versus Imaging How You Would Feel , 1997 .

[4]  C. Batson,et al.  Moral hypocrisy: appearing moral to oneself without being so. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  C. Gilligan.  In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development , 2009 .

[6]  A. Macintyre,et al.  FREEDOM AND REASON , 1963 .

[7]  T. Wickens.  Multiway Contingency Tables Analysis for the Social Sciences , 1989 .

[8]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Morality and the Development of Conceptions of Justice , 1981 .

[9]  M. Hoffman.  Moral Internalization: Current Theory And Research , 1977 .

[10]  Gilbert Harman,et al.  The nature of morality , 1977 .

[11]  Gordon Graham,et al.  On Human Conduct. , 1975 .

[12]  C. Batson,et al.  In a very different voice: unmasking moral hypocrisy. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  L. L. Shaw,et al.  Immorality from empathy-induced altruism: when compassion and justice conflict , 1995 .

[14]  J. Dewey.  Human Nature and Conduct , 1921 .

[15]  M. Orne.  On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. , 1962 .

[16]  M. Lerner,et al.  The Justice motive in social behavior : adapting to times of scarcity and change , 1981 .

[17]  A. Bandura.  Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. , 1991 .

[18]  Stephen E. Fienberg,et al.  The analysis of cross-classified categorical data , 1980 .

[19]  J. Freedman.  Long-term behavioral effects of cognitive dissonance. , 1965 .

[20]  C. Batson,et al.  Empathic mediation of helping: A two-stage model. , 1978 .

[21]  Gramercy Books,et al.  Webster's desk dictionary of the English language , 1990 .

[22]  Mark L. Johnson.  Moral Imagination: Implications of Cognitive Science for Ethics , 1993 .

[23]  D. Raphael,et al.  I: The Theory of Moral Sentiments , 1976 .

[24]  Elliot Aronson,et al.  Effect of the severity of threat on the devaluation of forbidden behavior. , 1963 .

[25]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  The Justice Motive in Everyday Life: Essays in Honor of Melvin J. Lerner , 2002 .

[26]  C. Batson.  The Altruism Question: Toward A Social-psychological Answer , 1991 .

[27]  L. L. Shaw,et al.  Empathy avoidance: Forestalling feeling for another in order to escape the motivational consequences. , 1994 .

[28]  Ezra Stotland,et al.  Exploratory Investigations of Empathy1 , 1969 .

[29]  L. Kohlberg.  Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization , 1969 .

[30]  R. Selman.  growth of interpersonal understanding , 1980 .