Comparison of fouling characteristics in different pore-sized submerged ceramic membrane bioreactors.

Membrane fouling, the key disadvantage that inevitably occurs continuously in the membrane bioreactor (MBR), baffles the wide-scale application of MBR. Ceramic membrane, which possesses high chemical and thermal resistance, has seldom been used in MBR to treat municipal wastewater. Four ceramic membranes with the same materials but different pore sizes, ranging from 80 to 300 nm, were studied in parallel using four lab-scale submerged MBRs (i.e., one type of ceramic membrane in one MBR). Total COD and ammonia nitrogen removal efficiencies were observed to be consistently above 94.5 and 98%, respectively, in all submerged ceramic membrane bioreactors. The experimental results showed that fouling was mainly affected by membrane's microstructure, surface roughness and pore sizes. Ceramic membrane with the roughest surface and biggest pore size (300 nm) had the highest fouling potential with respect to the TMP profile. The 80 nm membrane with a smoother surface and relatively uniform smaller pore openings experienced least membrane fouling with respect to TMP increase. The effects of the molecular weight distribution, particle size distribution and other biomass characteristics such as extracellular polymeric substances, zeta potential and capillary suction time, were also investigated in this study. Results showed that no significant differences of these attributes were observed. These observations indicate that the membrane surface properties are the dominant factors leading to different fouling potential in this study.

[1]  Zhen Zhou,et al.  Research and applications of membrane bioreactors in China: Progress and prospect , 2008 .

[2]  H. D. Janke,et al.  Continuous regeneration of degreasing solutions from electroplating operations using a membrane bioreactor , 2004 .

[3]  Chettiyappan Visvanathan,et al.  Landfill leachate treatment using thermophilic membrane bioreactor , 2007 .

[4]  E. O’Loughlin,et al.  Molecular weight, polydispersity, and spectroscopic properties of aquatic humic substances. , 1994, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  M. R. Bird,et al.  The influence of hydrophobicity, roughness and charge upon ultrafiltration membranes for black tea liquor clarification , 2008 .

[6]  H. H. Fang,et al.  Pore fouling of microfiltration membranes by activated sludge , 2005 .

[7]  Say Leong Ong,et al.  Membrane fouling of submerged membrane bioreactors: impact of mean cell residence time and the contributing factors. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  T. Melin,et al.  Correlation of EPS content in activated sludge at different sludge retention times with membrane fouling phenomena. , 2008, Water research.

[9]  Hang-Sik Shin,et al.  Sludge characteristics and their contribution to microfiltration in submerged membrane bioreactors , 2003 .

[10]  O. H. Lowry,et al.  Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. , 1951, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[11]  S. L. Khor,et al.  Effects of hydraulic retention time on behavior of start-up submerged membrane bioreactor with prolonged sludge retention time , 2006 .

[12]  Pierre Le-Clech,et al.  Fouling in membrane bioreactors used in wastewater treatment , 2006 .

[13]  Simon Judd,et al.  Membrane bioreactors for use in small wastewater treatment plants: membrane materials and effluent quality , 2000 .

[14]  Dianne E. Wiley,et al.  Factors influencing critical flux in membrane filtration of activated sludge , 1999 .

[15]  In-Soung Chang,et al.  Membrane filtration characteristics in membrane-coupled activated sludge system -- the effect of physiological states of activated sludge on membrane fouling , 1998 .

[16]  W. Jin,et al.  Effect of pH on microfiltration of Chinese herb aqueous extract by zirconia membrane , 2006 .

[17]  Muhammad Muhitur Rahman,et al.  Performance of a crossflow membrane bioreactor (CF-MBR) when treating refinery wastewater , 2006 .

[18]  Nazim Cicek,et al.  Characterization and Comparison of a Membrane Bioreactor and a Conventional Activated‐Sludge System in the Treatment of Wastewater Containing High‐Molecular‐Weight Compounds , 1999 .

[19]  F. Smith,et al.  COLORIMETRIC METHOD FOR DETER-MINATION OF SUGAR AND RELATED SUBSTANCE , 1956 .

[20]  Kazuo Yamamoto,et al.  Direct Solid-Liquid Separation Using Hollow Fiber Membrane in an Activated Sludge Aeration Tank , 1989 .

[21]  Simon Judd,et al.  Impact of aeration, solids concentration and membrane characteristics on the hydraulic performance of a membrane bioreactor , 2003 .

[22]  Kazuo Yamamoto,et al.  Household Membrane Bioreactor in Domestic Wastewater Treatment , 1993 .

[23]  Robert Dufresne,et al.  Étude comparative de flux et de performances lors du traitement d'effluent papetiers par bioréacteur à membranes , 1997 .

[24]  A. Grasmick,et al.  Influence of hydrodynamics on fouling velocity in a recirculated MBR for wastewater treatment , 1999 .

[25]  S. Liang,et al.  Soluble microbial products in membrane bioreactor operation: Behaviors, characteristics, and fouling potential. , 2007, Water research.

[26]  Simon Judd,et al.  Low-Cost Membranes for Use in a Submerged MBR , 2001 .

[27]  Xianghua Wen,et al.  Ultrafiltration membrane bioreactor for urban wastewater reclamation , 2000 .

[28]  How Yong Ng,et al.  Influence of mixed liquor recycle ratio and dissolved oxygen on performance of pre-denitrification submerged membrane bioreactors. , 2008, Water research.

[29]  Bo Zhang,et al.  High-concentration food wastewater treatment by an anaerobic membrane bioreactor. , 2005, Water research.

[30]  R. Dufresne,et al.  Comparative-Study on Fluxes and Performances During Paper-Mill Waste-Water Treatment with Membrane Bioreactor , 1997 .

[31]  Le Jin,et al.  Performance and fouling characteristics of different pore-sized submerged ceramic membrane bioreactors (SCMBR). , 2009, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[32]  I. Chang,et al.  Wastewater treatment using membrane filtration—effect of biosolids concentration on cake resistance , 2005 .

[33]  Yoshimasa Watanabe,et al.  Difference in membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors (MBRs) caused by membrane polymer materials , 2006 .

[34]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[35]  S. Hermanowicz,et al.  Membrane bioreactor operation at short solids retention times: performance and biomass characteristics. , 2005, Water research.