Economic effects of clean indoor air policies on bar and restaurant employment in Minneapolis and St Paul, Minnesota.

OBJECTIVES Clean indoor air (CIA) policies have been adopted by communities across the United States and internationally to protect employees in all workplaces from exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. Concerns have been raised that banning smoking in workplaces, particularly in bars and restaurants, will result in severe, negative economic effects. Although objective studies have consistently found no significant economic effects from CIA policies, the concerns persist that CIA policies will negatively affect hospitality businesses. METHODS Employment in bars and restaurants in Minneapolis and St Paul, Minnesota, was independently evaluated over a five-year period during which CIA policies were established in each city. An interrupted time series analysis was used to evaluate the short-, intermediate, and longer-term economic effects of the local CIA policies, accounting for the rest of the hospitality industry. RESULTS The CIA policies were associated with an increase of three percent to four percent in employment for restaurants in Minneapolis and St Paul, after accounting for the rest of the hospitality industry. The CIA policies were inconsistent in their association with bar employment. A comprehensive CIA policy in Minneapolis was associated with an increase of five percent to six percent in bar employment, and St Paul had a one percent nonsignificant decrease in bar employment. The CIA policies continue to yield the best protection against workplace exposure to environmental tobacco smoke for bars and restaurant employees and were not associated with large employment changes for the short or longer term in two urban Midwestern cities in the United States.

[1]  S. Glantz,et al.  The effect of ordinances requiring smoke-free restaurants on restaurant sales. , 1994, American journal of public health.

[2]  D. Cheng,et al.  Smoking in Boston bars before and after a 100% smoke-free regulation: an assessment of early compliance. , 2004, Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP.

[3]  S. Chapman,et al.  Political dynamics promoting the incremental regulation of secondhand smoke: a case study of New South Wales, Australia , 2006, BMC Public Health.

[4]  T. Rogers,et al.  Changes of attitudes and patronage behaviors in response to a smoke-free bar law. , 2003, American journal of public health.

[5]  A Hyland,et al.  Support for and reported compliance with smoke-free restaurants and bars by smokers in four countries: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey , 2006, Tobacco Control.

[6]  A. Woodward,et al.  After the smoke has cleared: evaluation of the impact of a new national smoke-free law in New Zealand , 2008, Tobacco Control.

[7]  S. Glantz,et al.  Long term compliance with California’s Smoke-Free Workplace Law among bars and restaurants in Los Angeles County , 2003, Tobacco control.

[8]  W. Fuller,et al.  Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root , 1979 .

[9]  J. Sciacca,et al.  Prohibiting Smoking in Restaurants: Effects on Restaurant Sales , 1998, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[10]  S. Glantz,et al.  The effect of ordinances requiring smoke-free restaurants and bars on revenues: a follow-up. , 1997, American journal of public health.

[11]  R. Room Smoking and drinking as complementary behaviours. , 2004, Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie.

[12]  A Hyland,et al.  Review of the quality of studies on the economic effects of smoke-free policies on the hospitality industry , 2003, Tobacco control.

[13]  G. Box,et al.  On a measure of lack of fit in time series models , 1978 .

[14]  A. Hyland,et al.  The effect of a smoke‐free law on restaurant business in South Australia , 2002, Australian and New Zealand journal of public health.

[15]  K. Cummings,et al.  Consumer response to the New York City Smoke-Free Air Act. , 1999, Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP.

[16]  M. Begay,et al.  Strange bedfellows: the history of collaboration between the Massachusetts Restaurant Association and the tobacco industry. , 2001, American journal of public health.

[17]  K. Cummings,et al.  Compliance with the New York City Smoke-Free Air Act. , 1999, Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP.

[18]  L. Lotrean Effects of comprehensive smoke-free legislation in Europe. , 2008, Salud publica de Mexico.

[19]  S. Glantz,et al.  Tobacco industry manipulation of the hospitality industry to maintain smoking in public places , 2002, Tobacco control.

[20]  Stewart J. D'alessio,et al.  Is Nonsmoking Dangerous to the Health of Restaurants? The Effect of California’s Indoor Smoking Ban on Restaurant Revenues , 2007, Evaluation review.

[21]  G. Gmel,et al.  The economic impact of a smoke-free bylaw on restaurant and bar sales in Ottawa, Canada. , 2006, Addiction.

[22]  S. Glantz,et al.  The Duluth clean indoor air ordinance: problems and success in fighting the tobacco industry at the local level in the 21st century. , 2003, American journal of public health.