Electrofuels – a possibility for shipping in a low carbon future?

Continued growth of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from the shipping industry until 2050 and beyond is expected although of the recent decline. The global share of anthropogenic CO2 emissions from ships is only about 2 percent, but there is a risk that this share will increase substantially if no action is taken. What are the possibilities for decarbonisation of the shipping industry, then? Some of the measures discussed are energy efficiency, use of biofuels and use of hydrogen. In this paper a fourth option is scrutinised – use of electrofuels. Electrofuels is an umbrella term for carbon-based fuels, e.g. methane or methanol, which are produced using electricity as the primary source of energy. The carbon in the fuel comes from CO2 which can be captured from various industrial processes such as exhaust gases, the sea or the air. The production of electrofuels is still in its infancy, and many challenges need to be overcome before electrofuels are brought to market on a large scale. First, this paper gives an overview of the current status of electrofuels regarding technologies, efficiencies and costs. Second, as electrofuels production requires significant amounts of CO2 and electricity, the feasibility to produce enough electrofuels to supply all ships bunkering in Sweden, with regionally produced electricity and regionally emitted CO2, and the amount of CO2 that is required to supply all ships globally is evaluated in two case studies assessing supply potential.

[1]  Göran Berndes,et al.  Bioenergy expansion in the EU: Cost-effective climate change mitigation, employment creation and reduced dependency on imported fuels , 2007 .

[2]  N. H. Ravindranath,et al.  Bioenergy and climate change mitigation: an assessment , 2015 .

[3]  R. Asariotis,et al.  Review of Maritime Transport, 2014 , 2010 .

[4]  Markus Lehner,et al.  Power-to-Gas: Technology and Business Models , 2014 .

[5]  Dolf Gielen,et al.  Biomass for heat or as transportation fuel? A comparison between two model-based studies , 2007 .

[6]  Raymond Francis Drnevich,et al.  Advanced Hydrogen Liquefaction Process , 2011 .

[7]  Alice Bows,et al.  Executing a Scharnow turn: reconciling shipping emissions with international commitments on climate change , 2012 .

[8]  Michael Sterner,et al.  Erneuerbares Methan: Analyse der CO2-Potenziale für Power-to-Gas Anlagen in Deutschland , 2012 .

[9]  Johannes Lindorfer,et al.  Evaluating CO2 sources for power-to-gas applications – A case study for Austria , 2015 .

[10]  William D'haeseleer,et al.  The interaction of a high renewable energy/low carbon power system with the gas system through power to gas. , 2014 .

[11]  A. Fabbri,et al.  CO2 capture and storage from a bioethanol plant: Carbon and energy footprint and economic assessment , 2011 .

[12]  G. Olah,et al.  Air as the renewable carbon source of the future: an overview of CO2 capture from the atmosphere , 2012 .

[13]  Maria Grahn,et al.  Cost-effective choices of marine fuels in a carbon-constrained world: results from a global energy model. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  Franklin Farell Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area: Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system , 2014 .

[15]  Magdalena Walczak,et al.  Sustainable energy for the marine sector , 2012 .

[16]  V. Eyring,et al.  Emissions from international shipping: 2. Impact of future technologies on scenarios until 2050 , 2005 .

[17]  V. Eyring,et al.  Second IMO GHG study 2009 , 2009 .

[18]  Michele Ferrari,et al.  Power to liquid and power to gas: An option for the German Energiewende , 2015 .

[19]  J. Mergel,et al.  Status on Technologies for Hydrogen Production by Water Electrolysis , 2013 .

[20]  Farzad Mohseni,et al.  Power to gas : Bridging renewable electricity to the transport sector , 2012 .

[21]  Johan Benjaminsson,et al.  El till Gas - System, ekonomi och teknik , 2013 .

[22]  Wim Turkenburg,et al.  A comparison of electricity and hydrogen production systems with CO2 capture and storage—Part B: Chain analysis of promising CCS options , 2007 .

[23]  Danièle Revel,et al.  IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation , 2011 .

[24]  E. Fridell,et al.  Environmental assessment of marine fuels: liquefied natural gas, liquefied biogas, methanol and bio-methanol , 2014 .

[25]  Jan Baeyens,et al.  Progress in Energy and Combustion Science , 2015 .

[26]  Gerda Gahleitner Hydrogen from renewable electricity: An international review of power-to-gas pilot plants for stationary applications , 2013 .

[27]  Andrea Ramírez,et al.  Comparative assessment of CO2 capture technologies for carbon-intensive industrial processes , 2012 .

[28]  Selma Bengtsson,et al.  Fuels for short sea shipping: A comparative assessment with focus on environmental impact , 2014 .

[29]  Ilkka Hannula,et al.  Co-production of synthetic fuels and district heat from biomass residues, carbon dioxide and electricity: Performance and cost analysis , 2015 .

[30]  Peter Hoffmann,et al.  Pathways to Low Carbon Shipping - Abatement Potential Towards 2030 , 2009 .

[31]  Alexandra Nikoleris,et al.  Elektrobränslen - en kunskapsöversikt , 2013 .