Rapid Design Space Exploration for Conceptual Design of Hypersonic Missions

During conceptual design, multidisciplinary optimization is often performed using computationally intensive direct methods. Prior work has shown that rapid design studies can be performed using fast indirect methods, but several optimization techniques including discrete dynamic programming, nonlinear inversion, and pseudospectral methods are required to construct a suitable initial guess within the design space. In this investigation, a simplied methodology is developed to eliminate these optimization techniques, enabling rapid design space exploration using continuation of indirect methods alone. This is made possible by initially converging to a simple solution that is outside of the design space of interest, and solutions within the design space of interest are quickly accessed through continuation from this initial solution. As an initial step to automate this continuation process, state transition tensors are used to predict optimal solutions throughout the design space. A methodology is developed to provide accurate predictions of trajectories with varying ight times, and the error of these predictions is controlled to regulate the continuation process. This approach provides exibility to adapt to future computational capabilities and serves as an initial step to bridge the gap between conceptual trajectory design and onboard trajectory planning.

[1]  Robert T. Bibeau,et al.  Trajectory optimization for a fixed trim re-entry vehicle using direct collocation with nonlinear programming , 2000 .

[2]  Michael J. Grant,et al.  Mars Science Laboratory Entry Optimization Using Particle Swarm Methodology , 2007 .

[3]  I︠u︡. P. Petrov Variational Methods in Optimum Control Theory , 2012 .

[4]  Ryan P. Russell,et al.  Optimal Control of Relative Motion in Arbitrary Fields: Application at Deimos , 2011 .

[5]  Arthur E. Bryson,et al.  Applied Optimal Control , 1969 .

[6]  Robert D. Braun,et al.  Rapid Entry Corridor Trajectory Optimization for Conceptual Design , 2010 .

[7]  I. Michael Ross,et al.  Rapid Verification Method for the Trajectory Optimization of Reentry Vehicles , 2003 .

[8]  W. Hager,et al.  An hp‐adaptive pseudospectral method for solving optimal control problems , 2011 .

[9]  Aaron Strauss Introduction to Optimal Control Theory , 1968 .

[10]  Robert D. Braun,et al.  High Mass Mars Entry, Descent, and Landing Architecture Assessment , 2009 .

[11]  Richard Vuduc,et al.  Fast sensitivity computations for trajectory optimization , 2010 .

[12]  Douglas O. Stanley,et al.  Comparison of two multidisciplinary optimization strategies for launch-vehicle design , 1995 .

[13]  John R. Olds,et al.  Evaluation of Multidisciplinary Optimization Techniques Applied to a Reusable Launch Vehicle , 2006 .

[14]  R. Park,et al.  Nonlinear Mapping of Gaussian Statistics: Theory and Applications to Spacecraft Trajectory Design , 2006 .

[15]  William C. Cohen,et al.  Optimal control theory—an introduction, Donald E. Kirk, Prentice Hall, Inc., New York (1971), 452 poges. $13.50 , 1971 .

[16]  Prasenjit Sengupta,et al.  Second-order state transition for relative motion near perturbed, elliptic orbits , 2007 .

[17]  J. Meditch,et al.  Applied optimal control , 1972, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[18]  David J. Kinney,et al.  Co-Optimization of Mid Lift to Drag Vehicle Concepts for Mars Atmospheric Entry , 2010 .

[19]  John R. Olds,et al.  Computational Frameworks for Collaborative Multidisciplinary Design of Complex Systems , 1998 .

[20]  R. Braun,et al.  Rapid Simultaneous Hypersonic Aerodynamic and Trajectory Optimization Using Variational Methods , 2011 .

[21]  G. Lantoine,et al.  A Hybrid Differential Dynamic Programming Algorithm for Robust Low-Thrust Optimization , 2008 .

[22]  Jarret M. Lafleur,et al.  Mars Entry Bank Profile Design for Terminal State Optimization , 2011 .

[23]  Michael J. Grant,et al.  Orion Entry Display Feeder and Interactions with the Entry Monitor System , 2010 .

[24]  A. L. Herman,et al.  Direct optimization using collocation based on high-order Gauss-Lobatto quadrature rules , 1996 .

[25]  Gavin Mendeck,et al.  Guidance Design for Mars Smart Landers Using the Entry Terminal Point Controller , 2002 .

[26]  John R. Olds,et al.  The suitability of selected multidisciplinary design and optimization techniques to conceptual aerospace vehicle design , 1992 .

[27]  Donald E. Kirk,et al.  Optimal control theory : an introduction , 1970 .

[28]  I.M. Ross,et al.  On the Pseudospectral Covector Mapping Theorem for Nonlinear Optimal Control , 2006, Proceedings of the 45th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[29]  M. Dayde,et al.  Parallel algorithms for nonlinear programming problems , 1989 .

[30]  Kamran Behdinan,et al.  Evaluation of Multidisciplinary Optimization Approaches for Aircraft Conceptual D esign , 2004 .

[31]  Qi Gong,et al.  Connections between the covector mapping theorem and convergence of pseudospectral methods for optimal control , 2008, Comput. Optim. Appl..

[32]  Robert D. Braun,et al.  The Planetary Entry Systems Synthesis Tool: A conceptual design and analysis tool for EDL systems , 2010, 2010 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[33]  Panagiotis Tsiotras,et al.  Density Functions for Mesh Refinement in Numerical Optimal Control , 2011 .

[34]  James D. Turner,et al.  High-Order State and Parameter Transition Tensor Calculations , 2008 .