From Framework to Organization-Specific Process Model for IT Investment Justification and Evaluation: An Experience of Action Research

This paper presents the preliminary results of an action research project in a large Norwegian oil and petrochemical company. It focuses on the pilot phase of the project for testing the feasibility and practicality of the unified justification and evaluation framework (UJEF) developed by the authors based on extant IT investment justification and evaluation theories and frameworks. The UJEF framework emphasizes the alignment between corporate competitive strategies and the objectives of IT investments and the integration between project justification and its subsequent evaluation. It builds on the strength of the recent theoretical development on competitive strategies, resource based view of IT value, real options analysis, and the balanced scorecard management system. The experience of the research shows that when dealing with theoretically complex, yet practically significant, issues such as IT investment justification and evaluation, action research methods can be valuable alternatives to traditional positivist approaches. The researchers and practitioners have benefited greatly from each other in this collaborative effort and consequently both theoretical and practical knowledge of IT investment justification and evaluation have been advanced. Areas of potential improvement are identified and future activities on this project are outlined.

[1]  P. Weill,et al.  Building IT Infrastructure for Strategic Agility , 2002 .

[2]  N. Carr IT doesn't matter , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[3]  H. Joseph Wen,et al.  A road map for the evaluation of information technology investment , 1998 .

[4]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Information systems evaluation: navigating through the problem domain , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[5]  Eric K. Clemons,et al.  Sustaining IT Advantage: The Role of Structural Differences , 1991, MIS Q..

[6]  SabherwalRajiv,et al.  Alignment Between Business and IS Strategies , 2001 .

[7]  J. Ward,et al.  Strategic Planning for Information Systems , 1990 .

[8]  Anandhi S. Bharadwaj,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation , 2000, MIS Q..

[9]  J. Hares,et al.  Measuring the value of information technology , 1994 .

[10]  Daniel M. Hartung,et al.  Contemporary Issues , 2002 .

[11]  R. Rapoport Three Dilemmas in Action Research , 1970 .

[12]  David C. Yen,et al.  Methods for measuring information technology investment payoff , 1998 .

[13]  M. Porter,et al.  How Information Gives You Competitive Advantage , 1985 .

[14]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  A model for investment justification in information technology projects , 2001, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[15]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Alignment Between Business and IS Strategies: A Study of Prospectors, Analyzers, and Defenders , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[16]  Nalin Kulatilaka,et al.  Options Thinking and Platform Investments: Investing in Opportunity , 1994 .

[17]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[18]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Review: Information Technology and Organizational Performance: An Integrative Model of IT Business Value , 2004, MIS Q..

[19]  F. Warren McFarlan,et al.  Corporate information systems management : text and cases , 1988 .

[20]  Trevor Wood-Harper,et al.  A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research , 1996, J. Inf. Technol..

[21]  Varun Grover,et al.  Shaping Agility through Digital Options: Reconceptualizing the Role of Information Technology in Contemporary Firms , 2003, MIS Q..

[22]  Elin Stangeland,et al.  Contemporary issues of enterprise content management: the case of statoil , 2003, ECIS.

[23]  Alfred Taudes,et al.  Options Analysis of Software Platform Decisions: A Case Study , 2000, MIS Q..

[24]  R. Kaplan,et al.  PUTTING THE BALANCED SCORECARD TO WORK , 1993 .

[25]  Beat Hochstrasser,et al.  Evaluating IT investments – matching techniques to projects , 1990, J. Inf. Technol..

[26]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  Evaluating Information Technology investments: research findings and reappraisal , 1992, Inf. Syst. J..

[27]  Qing Hu,et al.  Information intensity and the impact of IT investments on productivity: an industry level perspective , 2003, ECIS.

[28]  Frank F. Land,et al.  Evaluating investments in IT , 1992, J. Inf. Technol..

[29]  John C. Henderson,et al.  Strategic Alignment: Leveraging Information Technology for Transforming Organizations , 1993, IBM Syst. J..

[30]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system , 1996 .

[31]  Egon Berghout,et al.  Methodologies for information systems investment evaluation at the proposal stage: a comparative review , 1997, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[32]  Steven L. Alter,et al.  The Work System Method for Understanding Information Systems and Information Systems Research , 2002, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[33]  John C. Henderson,et al.  Strategic Alignment: Leveraging Information Technology for Transforming Organizations , 1999, IBM Syst. J..

[34]  David E. Avison,et al.  Action research , 1999, CACM.

[35]  Joan A. Ballantine,et al.  Information systems/technology evaluation practices: evidence from UK organizations , 1996, J. Inf. Technol..

[36]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. , 2015, Harvard business review.

[37]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  Justifying Electronic Banking Network Expansion Using Real Options Analysis , 2000, MIS Q..

[38]  Reed M. Gardner,et al.  Measuring the Value of Information Systems , 1984 .