Direct versus indirect suggestions: a conceptual and methodological review.

The article reviews the literature on the effects of direct versus indirect hypnotic suggestions. A conceptual and methodological analysis of direct versus indirect suggestions is also provided. Three conclusions follow from the review: (a) Contrary to views of Ericksonian hypnotists, suggestion style has little effect on objective responding to hypnotic test items; (b) studies of clinical- and laboratory-induced pain and other measures of subjective experience have yielded contradictory results--however, the best controlled studies have not indicated that indirect suggestions are superior to direct suggestions; and (c) there is insufficient evidence to conclude that hypnotizability level and suggestion wording interact, such that low hypnotizable subjects are particularly responsive to indirect suggestions. Methodological and conceptual problems in defining and studying hypnotic communications, the lack of rigorous experimental controls, and research issues and directions are highlighted.

[1]  P. Sheehan,et al.  Hypnosis Research. (Book Reviews: Methodologies of Hypnosis. A Critical Appraisal of Contemporary Paradigms of Hypnosis) , 2015 .

[2]  J. Reyher,et al.  The induction of hypnosis: indirect vs. direct methods and the role of anxiety. , 2011, The American journal of clinical hypnosis.

[3]  W. Matthews,et al.  Working hypnotically with deaf people. , 1991, The American journal of clinical hypnosis.

[4]  S. Lynn,et al.  Hypnosis, suggestion type, and subjective experience--the order-effects hypothesis revisited: a brief communication. , 1990, The International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis.

[5]  M. Nash,et al.  Hypnosis and transference: a measure of archaic involvement. , 1989, The International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis.

[6]  S. Lynn,et al.  Direct versus indirect suggestions, archaic involvement, and hypnotic experience. , 1988, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[7]  P. Spinhoven,et al.  The effectiveness of an authoritative versus permissive style of hypnotic communication. , 1988, The International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis.

[8]  S. Lynn,et al.  Inductions versus suggestions: effects of direct and indirect wording on hypnotic responding and experience. , 1987, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[9]  N. Spaños.  More on the social psychology of hypnotic responding , 1986, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[10]  N. Spanos,et al.  Hypnotic behavior: A social-psychological interpretation of amnesia, analgesia, and “trance logic” , 1986, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[11]  D. Woolson.  An experimental comparison of direct and Ericksonian hypnotic induction procedures and the relationship to secondary suggestibility. , 1986, The American journal of clinical hypnosis.

[12]  W. V. van Gorp,et al.  The efficacy of direct versus indirect hypnotic induction techniques on reduction of experimental pain. , 1985, The International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis.

[13]  R. Lundy,et al.  Behavioral compliance with direct and indirect body movement suggestions. , 1985, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[14]  W. Matthews,et al.  Indirect versus direct hypnotic suggestions--an initial investigation: a brief communication. , 1985, The International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis.

[15]  J. Fricton,et al.  The Effects of Direct and Indirect Hypnotic Suggestions for Analgesia in High and Low Susceptible Subjects , 1985 .

[16]  W. Matthews,et al.  Double hypnotic induction: an initial empirical test. , 1985, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[17]  Penny L. Gillett,et al.  The effects of rapid induction analgesia (RIA), hypnotic susceptibility and the severity of discomfort on reducing dental pain. , 1984, The American journal of clinical hypnosis.

[18]  K. McConkey.  The impact of an indirect suggestion. , 1984, The International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis.

[19]  M. Yapko.  A comparative analysis of direct and indirect hypnotic communication styles. , 1983, The American journal of clinical hypnosis.

[20]  Stephen R. Lankton.  The Answer Within: A Clinical Framework Of Ericksonian Hypnotherapy , 1983 .

[21]  J. Brehm,et al.  Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control , 1981 .

[22]  R. E. Carney,et al.  Consequences of direct and indirect suggestions on success of posthypnotic behavior. , 1980, The American journal of clinical hypnosis.

[23]  J. Barber.  Hypnosis and the unhypnotizable. , 1980, The American journal of clinical hypnosis.

[24]  N. Spanos,et al.  Cognitive activity during "hypnotic" suggestibility: goal-directed fantasy and the experience of nonvolition. , 1972, Journal of personality.

[25]  F. J. Evans.  An experimental indirect technique for the induction of hypnosis without awareness. , 1967, The International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis.

[26]  M. Orne.  The nature of hypnosis: artifact and essence. , 1959, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[27]  N. Spaños.  A sociocognitive approach to hypnosis. , 1991 .

[28]  V. Gheorghiu.  The Development of Research on Suggestibility: Critical Considerations , 1989 .

[29]  P. Spinhoven,et al.  The effectiveness of standardized versus individualized hypnotic suggestions: a brief communication. , 1989, The International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis.

[30]  W. O'Hanlon.  Taproots: Underlying Principles of Milton Erickson's Therapy and Hypnosis , 1987 .

[31]  George J. Pratt,et al.  A Clinical Hypnosis Primer , 1984 .

[32]  J. Reyher,et al.  The effect of different types of influence on an "indirect-direct" form of a scale of sensory suggestibility. , 1982, The American journal of clinical hypnosis.

[33]  E. Rossi,et al.  Hypnotherapy: An Exploratory Casebook , 1979 .

[34]  E. Rossi,et al.  The collected papers of Milton H. Erickson on hypnosis , 1979 .

[35]  J. Hilgard,et al.  The Stanford Hypnotic Clinical Scale for adults. , 1978, The American journal of clinical hypnosis.

[36]  J. Barber.  Rapid induction analgesia: a clinical report. , 1977, The American journal of clinical hypnosis.

[37]  Richard Bandler,et al.  The Structure Of Magic , 1975 .