A canonical coalitional game theoretic approach for energy management for nanogrids

This paper explores the benefits of forming a coalition of a number of nanogrids in a smart community when they assist by supplying their energy surplus to a shared facility controller (SFC). In this context, a canonical coalition game (CCG) is studied, in which a number of nanogrids, such as households, form a grand coalition in order to supply a contracted amount of energy to the SFC with a view to gain some revenue. A suitable utility function is proposed that captures the benefit to the coalition of trading the energy with the SFC, as well as the penalty that may occur if the coalition fails to provide the SFC with the contracted energy amount. The properties of the coalition are studied and a fair utility allocation technique, i.e., a proportional payoff division scheme, is exploited for distributing the benefits between the participating nanogrids based on the supply they contribute.

[1]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  Three-Party Energy Management With Distributed Energy Resources in Smart Grid , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[2]  Chau Yuen,et al.  Demand shaping to achieve steady electricity consumption with load balancing in a smart grid , 2012, 2013 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference (ISGT).

[3]  Dushan Boroyevich,et al.  Future electronic power distribution systems a contemplative view , 2010, 2010 12th International Conference on Optimization of Electrical and Electronic Equipment.

[4]  Chau Yuen,et al.  Peak-to-Average Ratio Constrained Demand-Side Management With Consumer's Preference in Residential Smart Grid , 2014, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[5]  Chau Yuen,et al.  Queuing-Based Energy Consumption Management for Heterogeneous Residential Demands in Smart Grid , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[6]  Zhu Han,et al.  Coalitional game theory for communication networks , 2009, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[7]  Hongbin Sun,et al.  Active Demand Response Using Shared Energy Storage for Household Energy Management , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[8]  Kenneth J. Christensen,et al.  Local power distribution with nanogrids , 2013, 2013 International Green Computing Conference Proceedings.

[9]  Chris Marnay,et al.  Future Roles of Milli-, Micro-, and Nano- Grids , 2012 .

[10]  Xi Fang,et al.  3. Full Four-channel 6.3-gb/s 60-ghz Cmos Transceiver with Low-power Analog and Digital Baseband Circuitry 7. Smart Grid — the New and Improved Power Grid: a Survey , 2022 .

[11]  Richard Duke,et al.  DC-Bus Signaling: A Distributed Control Strategy for a Hybrid Renewable Nanogrid , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[12]  D. Boroyevich,et al.  A testbed for experimental validation of a low-voltage DC nanogrid for buildings , 2012, 2012 15th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference (EPE/PEMC).

[13]  Kameshwar Poolla,et al.  Wind energy aggregation: A coalitional game approach , 2011, IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference.

[14]  Chau Yuen,et al.  Electricity Cost Minimization for a Microgrid With Distributed Energy Resource Under Different Information Availability , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[15]  Sercan Teleke,et al.  Nanogrids with energy storage for future electricity grids , 2014, 2014 IEEE PES T&D Conference and Exposition.

[16]  Wayes Tushar,et al.  Customer Engagement Plans for Peak Load Reduction in Residential Smart Grids , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[17]  Walid Saad,et al.  Coalitional Game Theory for Cooperative Micro-Grid Distribution Networks , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC).

[18]  Kenneth J. Christensen,et al.  Think Globally, Distribute Power Locally: The Promise of Nanogrids , 2012, Computer.