The Effect of Risk and Autonomy on Independent Hog Producers' Contracting Decisions

Abstract The introduction of vertical coordination in the hog industry has provided producers with new business arrangements for raising hogs. While some researchers have elicited utility functions for hog producers on the basis of income risk, none have addressed autonomy, a factor which appears to be important in business arrangement selection for independent family hog operations. In this study, a method is developed for eliciting a multi-attribute function with attributes of income and autonomy. Utility functions are elicited for a group of Minnesota farrow-to-finish hog producers. For these producers, autonomy dominated risk as the most important attribute in business arrangement selection.

[1]  K. Gunjal,et al.  Risk Preferences of Dairy and Hog Producer in Quebec , 1995 .

[2]  A. Hallam.  The competitive firm's response to risk , 1987 .

[3]  J. Dillon,et al.  Agricultural Decision Analysis , 1977 .

[4]  Paul V. Preckel,et al.  Multiattribute Assessment of Alternative Cropping Systems , 1995 .

[5]  Carl-Axel S. Staël von Holstein,et al.  Exceptional Paper---Probability Encoding in Decision Analysis , 1975 .

[6]  F. B. Vernadat,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs , 1994 .

[7]  J. Fulton,et al.  Emerging Business Organizations in a Rapidly Changing Pork Industry , 1995 .

[8]  Brian F. Blake,et al.  Farmers' Goals: Uni- or Multi-Dimensional? , 1983 .

[9]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[10]  Paul N. Wilson,et al.  An Empirical Test of the Interval Approach for Estimating Risk Preferences , 1983 .

[11]  J. Kliebenstein,et al.  Contracting and Vertical Coordination in the United States Pork Industry , 1995 .

[12]  C. Hurt.  Industrialization in the Pork Industry , 1994 .

[13]  K. Arrow.  Essays in the theory of risk-bearing , 1958 .

[14]  Atanu Saha,et al.  Expo-Power Utility: A ‘Flexible’ Form for Absolute and Relative Risk Aversion , 1993 .

[15]  J. Pratt.  RISK AVERSION IN THE SMALL AND IN THE LARGE11This research was supported by the National Science Foundation (grant NSF-G24035). Reproduction in whole or in part is permitted for any purpose of the United States Government. , 1964 .

[16]  M. S. Kaylen,et al.  Risk Management For Livestock Producers: Hedging And Contract Production , 1990 .

[17]  M. Machina.  "Expected Utility" Analysis without the Independence Axiom , 1982 .

[18]  K. Foster,et al.  Risk Preferences and Contracting In the U.S. Hog Industry , 1994, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.

[19]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs , 1976 .

[20]  R. Officer,et al.  Utility Analysis in a Practical Setting , 1968 .