Synthetic Indicators of Quality of Life in Europe

For more than three decades now, sociologists, politicians and economists have used a wide range of statistical and econometric techniques to analyse and measure the quality of life of individuals with the aim of obtaining useful instruments for social, political and economic decision making. The aim of this paper is to analyse the advantages and disadvantages of three possible methodologies for obtaining synthetic indicators for the area of welfare and quality of life. These methodologies are Principal Components Analysis, Data Envelopment Analysis and Measure of Distance P2. Furthermore this paper analyses quality of life in the European Union (EU), as a methodological exercise to demonstrate the principles of calculation, implications and differences between the three indicator-construction approaches. This analysis is particularly useful in a scene like the EU, immersed in a deep transformation process and with profound cultural, economic and social inequalities. Therefore, an analysis of the quality of life and well-being of its inhabitants can play a major role in ironing out such differences.

[1]  M. Farrell The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[2]  Erik Allardt A welfare model for selecting indicators of national development , 1973 .

[3]  Erik Allardt Dimensions of welfare in a Comparative Scandinavian Study , 1976 .

[4]  J. B. P. Trapero,et al.  Problemas de la medición del bienestar y conceptos afines: (una aplicación al caso español) , 1977 .

[5]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[6]  Rati Ram,et al.  Composite indices of physical quality of life, basic needs fulfilment, and income: A ‘principal component’ representation , 1982 .

[7]  Daniel Jonathan Slottje,et al.  Measuring The Quality Of Life Across Countries , 1991 .

[8]  Rati Ram Intercountry inequalities in income and basic- needs indicators: A recent perspective , 1992 .

[9]  A. Hashimoto,et al.  Using DEA to evaluate the state of society as measured by multiple social indicators , 1993 .

[10]  Pilar Zarzosa Espina Aproximación a la medición del bienestar social , 1996 .

[11]  Akihiro Hashimoto,et al.  Has Livability of Japan Gotten Better for 1956–1990?: a Dea Approach , 1997 .

[12]  Stephen Haag,et al.  Efficient provision of child quality of life in less developed countries: conventional development indexes versus a programming approach to development indexes , 2000 .

[13]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Multidimensional quality-of-life measure with an application to Fortune's best cities , 2001 .

[14]  Michael Obersteiner,et al.  Remeasuring the HDI by Data Envelopement Analysis , 2001 .

[15]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  Benchmarking Sustainable Development : A Synthetic Meta-index Approach , 2002 .

[16]  Dimitris K. Despotis,et al.  A reassessment of the human development index via data envelopment analysis , 2005, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[17]  Dimitris K. Despotis,et al.  Measuring human development via data envelopment analysis: the case of Asia and the Pacific , 2005 .

[18]  P. Murias,et al.  An Economic Wellbeing Index for the Spanish Provinces: A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach , 2006 .

[19]  Sudhanshu K. Mishra Construction of maximin and non-elitist composite indices - alternatives to elitist indices obtained by the principal components analysis , 2007 .

[20]  J. J. Núñez-Velázquez,et al.  A Proposal of a Synthetic Indicator to Measure Poverty Intensity, With an Application to EU-15 Countries , 2007 .