Quantum speed limit time for correlated quantum channel

Memory effects play a fundamental role in the dynamics of open quantum systems. There exist two different views on memory for quantum noises. In the first view, the quantum channel has memory when there exist correlations between successive uses of the channels on a sequence of quantum systems. These types of channels are also known as correlated quantum channels. In the second view, memory effects result from correlations which are created during the quantum evolution. In this work we will consider the first view and study the quantum speed limit time for a correlated quantum channel. Quantum speed limit time is the bound on the minimal time which is needed for a quantum system to evolve from an initial state to desired states. The quantum evolution is fast if the quantum speed limit time is short. In this work, we will study the quantum speed limit time for some correlated unital and correlated non-unital channels. As an example for unital channels we choose correlated dephasing colored noise. We also consider the correlated amplitude damping and correlated squeezed generalized amplitude damping channels as the examples for non-unital channels. It will be shown that the quantum speed limit time for correlated pure dephasing colored noise is increased by increasing correlation strength, while for correlated amplitude damping and correlated squeezed generalized amplitude damping channels quantum speed limit time is decreased by increasing correlation strength.

[1]  Guo-you Wang,et al.  Dynamics of entropic uncertainty relation under quantum channels with memory , 2017, Journal of Modern Optics.

[2]  Effect of correlated noise channels on quantum speed limit , 2018, 1807.07782.

[3]  K. Modi,et al.  Tight, robust, and feasible quantum speed limits for open dynamics , 2018, Quantum.

[4]  M. Ramzan,et al.  Entanglement dynamics of non-inertial observers in a correlated environment , 2013, Quantum Inf. Process..

[5]  F. Toscano,et al.  Quantum-speed-limit bounds in an open quantum evolution , 2016, 1609.04396.

[6]  T. Toffoli,et al.  Fundamental limit on the rate of quantum dynamics: the unified bound is tight. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[7]  S. Huelga,et al.  Quantum non-Markovianity: characterization, quantification and detection , 2014, Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society.

[8]  S. Lloyd,et al.  Quantum limits to dynamical evolution , 2002, quant-ph/0210197.

[9]  G. Karpat,et al.  Non-Markovianity through Accessible Information , 2014, 1402.5395.

[10]  A. S. Khorashad,et al.  The Role of the Total Entropy Production in the Dynamics of Open Quantum Systems in Detection of Non-Markovianity , 2015, 1504.04793.

[11]  F. Nori,et al.  Quantum biology , 2012, Nature Physics.

[12]  R. Srikanth,et al.  Squeezed generalized amplitude damping channel , 2007, 0707.0059.

[13]  V. Giovannetti,et al.  Quantum channels and memory effects , 2012, 1207.5435.

[14]  Koenraad M. R. Audenaert,et al.  Comparisons between quantum state distinguishability measures , 2012, Quantum Inf. Comput..

[15]  M B Plenio,et al.  Quantum speed limits in open system dynamics. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[16]  Susana F Huelga,et al.  Entanglement and non-markovianity of quantum evolutions. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[17]  Arun Kumar Pati,et al.  Quantum speed limit for mixed states using an experimentally realizable metric , 2014, 1403.5182.

[18]  Alex W Chin,et al.  Quantum metrology in non-Markovian environments. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[19]  R. Ghosh,et al.  Dynamics of decoherence without dissipation in a squeezed thermal bath , 2007, quant-ph/0703054.

[20]  N. Margolus,et al.  The maximum speed of dynamical evolution , 1997, quant-ph/9710043.

[21]  M. M. Taddei,et al.  Quantum Speed Limit for Physical Processes , 2013 .

[22]  Krzysztof Wódkiewicz,et al.  Depolarizing channel as a completely positive map with memory , 2004 .

[23]  S. Huelga,et al.  Vibrations, quanta and biology , 2013, 1307.3530.

[24]  S. Haseli,et al.  A measure of non-Markovianity for unital quantum dynamical maps , 2014, Quantum Inf. Process..

[25]  E. Lutz,et al.  Quantum speed limit for non-Markovian dynamics. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[26]  Ke Zeng,et al.  Generation and protection of steady-state quantum correlations due to quantum channels with memory , 2016, Quantum Inf. Process..

[27]  K. Wódkiewicz,et al.  Quantum Markov channels for qubits , 2002, quant-ph/0211001.

[28]  Subhashis Banerjee,et al.  Dynamics of entanglement in two-qubit open system interacting with a squeezed thermal bath via dissipative interaction , 2009, 0901.0404.

[29]  J Eisert,et al.  Assessing non-Markovian quantum dynamics. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[30]  R. Werner,et al.  Quantum channels with memory , 2005, quant-ph/0502106.

[31]  C. Macchiavello,et al.  Entanglement-enhanced information transmission over a quantum channel with correlated noise , 2001, quant-ph/0107052.

[32]  Andrew Skeen,et al.  Time-correlated quantum amplitude-damping channel , 2003 .

[33]  Zhen-Yu Xu,et al.  Quantum-speed-limit time for multiqubit open systems , 2014, 1410.8239.

[34]  Wei Han,et al.  Quantum speed limit for arbitrary initial states , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[35]  Hong Guo,et al.  Minimal evolution time and quantum speed limit of non-Markovian open systems , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[36]  Andrzej Kossakowski,et al.  Properties of Quantum Markovian Master Equations , 1978 .

[37]  Francesco Petruccione,et al.  The Theory of Open Quantum Systems , 2002 .

[38]  I. Tamm,et al.  The Uncertainty Relation Between Energy and Time in Non-relativistic Quantum Mechanics , 1991 .

[39]  M. M. Taddei,et al.  Quantum speed limit for physical processes. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[40]  Sandor Imre,et al.  Advanced Quantum Communications: An Engineering Approach , 2012 .

[41]  Aharonov,et al.  Geometry of quantum evolution. , 1990, Physical review letters.

[42]  J. Steele.  The Cauchy–Schwarz Master Class: References , 2004 .

[43]  G. Karpat.  Entropic uncertainty relation under correlated dephasing channels , 2018, Canadian Journal of Physics.

[44]  H. Carmichael.  An open systems approach to quantum optics , 1993 .

[45]  U. Weiss.  Quantum Dissipative Systems , 1993 .

[46]  L. Davidovich,et al.  General framework for estimating the ultimate precision limit in noisy quantum-enhanced metrology , 2011, 1201.1693.

[47]  Z. Xu,et al.  Quantum Speed Limit of a Photon under Non-Markovian Dynamics , 2013, 1309.1391.

[48]  G. Lindblad.  On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups , 1976 .

[49]  Shunlong Luo,et al.  Quantum speedup in a memory environment , 2013, 1311.1593.

[50]  G. Karpat,et al.  Non-Markovianity through flow of information between a system and an environment , 2014, 1410.2504.

[51]  R. Kosloff,et al.  Speed limits in Liouville space for open quantum systems , 2016, 1607.00941.

[52]  Jinhyoung Lee,et al.  Entanglement of a two-mode squeezed state in a phase-sensitive gaussian environment , 2002, quant-ph/0206197.

[53]  Christopher King,et al.  Minimal entropy of states emerging from noisy quantum channels , 2001, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[54]  B. Simon.  Trace ideals and their applications , 1979 .

[55]  John H. Reina,et al.  Galactic Dynamics , 1995 .

[56]  R. Bhatia.  Matrix Analysis , 1996 .

[57]  Hyundong Shin,et al.  Quantum Correlation in Squeezed Generalized Amplitude Damping Channels with Memory , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[58]  S. Olivares,et al.  Continuous-variable quantum key distribution in non-Markovian channels , 2010, 1011.0304.

[59]  Hsi-Sheng Goan,et al.  Optimal control for non-Markovian open quantum systems , 2012, 1203.6128.

[60]  Akio Fujiwara,et al.  Estimation of a generalized amplitude-damping channel , 2004 .