Analytical Fragility Functions for Horizontally Curved Steel I-Girder Highway Bridges

Horizontally curved bridges were investigated following a statistical evaluation of typical details commonly used in the United States. Both seismically and non-seismically designed bridges are considered where the primary differences are in column confinement, type of bearings and abutment support length. Columns and bearings were found to be the most seismically vulnerable components for both categories. Central angle was identified as an important factor that increases the demand on various components, particularly columns. Furthermore, larger angles lead to increased deformations at the supports which adversely affect the seismic vulnerability. Consistent with the fragility curves that account for the central angle explicitly, a second set of system fragility curves were introduced for cases when central angle is not specified such as the case in the National Bridge Inventory. Comparison of fragility parameters to those suggested by HAZUS-MH highlighted the need for revisions to account for current design practices and central angle.

[1]  China Earthquake Reconnaissance Report: Performance of Transportation Structures During the May 12, 2008, M7.9 , 2011 .

[2]  A. Kiremidjian,et al.  Seismic Risk Assessment of Transportation Network Systems , 2007 .

[3]  Jazalyn Denise Dukes,et al.  Application of bridge specific fragility analysis in the seismic design process of bridges in california , 2013 .

[4]  Nicolas Luco,et al.  Structure-Specific Scalar Intensity Measures for Near-Source and Ordinary Earthquake Ground Motions , 2007 .

[5]  China Earthquake Reconnaissance Report: Performance of Transportation Structures during the May 12, 2008, M7.9 Wenchuan Earthquake , 2011 .

[6]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  Probabilistic fragility analysis parameterized by fundamental response quantities , 2007 .

[7]  Howard H. M. Hwang,et al.  Seismic Fragility Analysis of Highway Bridges , 2001 .

[8]  Junwon Seo,et al.  Horizontally curved steel bridge seismic vulnerability assessment , 2012 .

[9]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  Retrofitted Bridge Fragility Analysis for Typical Classes of Multispan Bridges , 2009 .

[10]  Y. K. Wen,et al.  Uniform Hazard Ground Motions for Mid-America Cities , 2001 .

[11]  Daniel G. Linzell,et al.  Parameters influencing seismic response of horizontally curved, steel, I-girder bridges , 2011 .

[12]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  Bridge Seismic Retrofitting Practices in the Central and Southeastern United States , 2011 .

[13]  H Y Kim,et al.  STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF FRAGILITY CURVES , 2000 .

[14]  Gokhan Pekcan,et al.  Analytical Modeling of Horizontally Curved Steel Girder Highway Bridges for Seismic Analysis , 2015 .

[15]  Masanobu Shinozuka,et al.  Nonlinear Static Procedure for Fragility Curve Development , 2000 .

[16]  Marios K. Chryssanthopoulos,et al.  Probabilistic evaluation of behaviour factors in EC8-designed R/C frames , 2000 .

[17]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  Methodology for the development of analytical fragility curves for retrofitted bridges , 2008 .

[18]  Ian G. Buckle.  The Northridge, California earthquake of January 17, 1994 : Perfomance of highway bridges , 1994 .

[19]  Eunsoo Choi,et al.  Seismic analysis and retrofit of mid-America bridges , 2002 .

[21]  Terri R. Norton,et al.  Seismic damage assessment of curved bridges using fragility analysis , 2011 .

[22]  C. V. Anderson,et al.  The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) , 2002 .

[23]  J. Mander,et al.  Seismic Fragility Curve Theory for Highway Bridges , 1999 .

[24]  B. G. Nielson.  Analytical Fragility Curves for Highway Bridges in Moderate Seismic Zones , 2005 .

[25]  Howard H. M. Hwang,et al.  Evaluation of Seismic Damage to Memphis Bridges and Highway Systems , 2000 .

[26]  Armen Der Kiureghian,et al.  PROBABILISTIC SEISMIC DEMAND MODELS AND FRAGILITY ESTIMATES FOR RC BRIDGES , 2003 .

[27]  John B. Mander,et al.  RESPONSE OF STEEL BRIDGE BEARINGS TO REVERSED CYCLIC LOADING , 1996 .

[28]  C. Allin Cornell,et al.  Probabilistic Basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency Steel Moment Frame Guidelines , 2002 .

[29]  Scott J. Brandenberg,et al.  Effects of structural characterizations on fragility functions of bridges subject to seismic shaking and lateral spreading , 2008 .

[30]  R. Barrón-Corvera.  Spectral evaluation of seismic fragility of structures , 2001 .

[31]  Junwon Seo,et al.  Use of response surface metamodels to generate system level fragilities for existing curved steel bridges , 2013 .

[32]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  Analytical Fragility Curves for Multispan Continuous Steel Girder Bridges in Moderate Seismic Zones , 2010 .

[33]  G Pekcan,et al.  EFFECT OF SKEW ON THE SEISMIC VULNERABILITY OF RC BOX GIRDER HIGHWAY BRIDGES , 2013 .

[34]  James S. Davidson,et al.  Design and Construction of Modern Curved Bridges , 2002 .

[35]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  A Hertz contact model with non‐linear damping for pounding simulation , 2006 .

[36]  Frieder Seible,et al.  SEISMIC RESPONSE OF SACRIFICIAL SHEAR KEYS IN BRIDGE ABUTMENTS. , 2002 .

[37]  Kevin R. Mackie,et al.  Seismic Demands for Performance-Based Design of Bridges , 2003 .

[38]  Anooshirvan Shamsabadi,et al.  Three-dimensional nonlinear seismic soil-abutment-foundation-structure interaction analysis of skewed bridges , 2007 .

[39]  Ebrahim AmiriHormozaki,et al.  Analytical Fragility Curves for Horizontally Curved Steel Girder Highway Bridges , 2013 .

[40]  Michel Bruneau,et al.  Seismic Behavior of Steel Girder Bridge Superstructures , 2004 .