Phasic Firing in Vasopressin Cells: Understanding Its Functional Significance through Computational Models

Vasopressin neurons, responding to input generated by osmotic pressure, use an intrinsic mechanism to shift from slow irregular firing to a distinct phasic pattern, consisting of long bursts and silences lasting tens of seconds. With increased input, bursts lengthen, eventually shifting to continuous firing. The phasic activity remains asynchronous across the cells and is not reflected in the population output signal. Here we have used a computational vasopressin neuron model to investigate the functional significance of the phasic firing pattern. We generated a concise model of the synaptic input driven spike firing mechanism that gives a close quantitative match to vasopressin neuron spike activity recorded in vivo, tested against endogenous activity and experimental interventions. The integrate-and-fire based model provides a simple physiological explanation of the phasic firing mechanism involving an activity-dependent slow depolarising afterpotential (DAP) generated by a calcium-inactivated potassium leak current. This is modulated by the slower, opposing, action of activity-dependent dendritic dynorphin release, which inactivates the DAP, the opposing effects generating successive periods of bursting and silence. Model cells are not spontaneously active, but fire when perturbed by random perturbations mimicking synaptic input. We constructed one population of such phasic neurons, and another population of similar cells but which lacked the ability to fire phasically. We then studied how these two populations differed in the way that they encoded changes in afferent inputs. By comparison with the non-phasic population, the phasic population responds linearly to increases in tonic synaptic input. Non-phasic cells respond to transient elevations in synaptic input in a way that strongly depends on background activity levels, phasic cells in a way that is independent of background levels, and show a similar strong linearization of the response. These findings show large differences in information coding between the populations, and apparent functional advantages of asynchronous phasic firing.

[1]  R. Landgraf,et al.  Regulation of activity‐dependent dendritic vasopressin release from rat supraoptic neurones , 2005, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  T. Brennan,et al.  The role of blood osmolality and volume in regulating vasopressin secretion in the rat. , 1973, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[3]  D. Poulain,et al.  Electrophysiology of hypothalamic magnocellular neurones secreting oxytocin and vasopressin , 1982, Neuroscience.

[4]  A. Murray,et al.  Modelling the In vivo Spike Activity of Phasically‐Firing Vasopressin Cells , 2010, Journal of neuroendocrinology.

[5]  E. Stuenkel,et al.  Regulation of secretory granule recruitment and exocytosis at rat neurohypophysial nerve endings. , 1997, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  R. Dyball,et al.  Characterization of the responses of oxytocin‐ and vasopressin‐secreting neurones in the supraoptic nucleus to osmotic stimulation , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  Colin H. Brown,et al.  Mechanisms of rhythmogenesis: insights from hypothalamic vasopressin neurons , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.

[8]  M. Ludwig,et al.  The role of the actin cytoskeleton in oxytocin and vasopressin release from rat supraoptic nucleus neurons , 2007, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  C. Bourque,et al.  Muscarinic Receptor Modulation of Slow Afterhyperpolarization and Phasic Firing in Rat Supraoptic Nucleus Neurons , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  G. I. Hatton,et al.  Reduced outward K+ conductances generate depolarizing after–potentials in rat supraoptic nucleus neurones , 1997, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  R. Dyball,et al.  Phasic firing enhances vasopressin release from the rat neurohypophysis , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  C. Bourque,et al.  Activity dependence and functional role of the apamin‐sensitive K+ current in rat supraoptic neurones in vitro. , 1996, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  G. Leng,et al.  Phasic pattern of electrical stimulation enhances oxytocin secretion from the isolated neurohypophysis , 1982, Neuroscience Letters.

[14]  G Leng,et al.  Bistability with Hysteresis in the Activity of Vasopressin Cells , 2007, Journal of neuroendocrinology.

[15]  A. Destexhe,et al.  The high-conductance state of neocortical neurons in vivo , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[16]  Gareth Leng,et al.  Phasic spike patterning in rat supraoptic neurones in vivo and in vitro , 2004, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  Gareth Leng,et al.  Physiological pathways regulating the activity of magnocellular neurosecretory cells , 1999, Progress in Neurobiology.

[18]  R. Dyball,et al.  Mechanisms of vasopressin secretion. , 1992, Hormone research.

[19]  G Leng,et al.  κ-Opioid Regulation of Neuronal Activity in the Rat Supraoptic Nucleus In Vivo , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  C. Bourque,et al.  Flufenamic acid blocks depolarizing afterpotentials and phasic firing in rat supraoptic neurones , 2002, The Journal of physiology.

[21]  V. Scott,et al.  Dehydration‐induced modulation of κ‐opioid inhibition of vasopressin neurone activity , 2009, The Journal of physiology.

[22]  G. Leng,et al.  Endogenous activation of supraoptic nucleus kappa-opioid receptors terminates spontaneous phasic bursts in rat magnocellular neurosecretory cells. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  Peter Roper,et al.  Burst Initiation and Termination in Phasic Vasopressin Cells of the Rat Supraoptic Nucleus: A Combined Mathematical, Electrical, and Calcium Fluorescence Study , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  V. Scott,et al.  Population Dynamics in Vasopressin Cells , 2008, Neuroendocrinology.

[25]  W. Armstrong,et al.  Performance, Properties and Plasticity of Identified Oxytocin and Vasopressin Neurones In Vitro , 2010, Journal of neuroendocrinology.

[26]  Louis Nadeau,et al.  New determinants of firing rates and patterns of vasopressinergic magnocellular neurons: predictions using a mathematical model of osmodetection , 2011, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[27]  G. Leng,et al.  In Vivo Modulation of Post‐Spike Excitability in Vasopressin Cells by κ‐Opioid Receptor Activation , 2000, Journal of neuroendocrinology.

[28]  Jianfeng Feng,et al.  Responses of Magnocellular Neurons to Osmotic Stimulation Involves Coactivation of Excitatory and Inhibitory Input: An Experimental and Theoretical Analysis , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  Louis Nadeau,et al.  Quantitative prediction of vasopressin secretion using a computational population model of rat magnocellular neurons , 2012, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[30]  Peter Roper,et al.  AHP's, HAP's and DAP's: How Potassium Currents Regulate the Excitability of Rat Supraoptic Neurones , 2003, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[31]  G. Leng,et al.  The Involvement of Voltage-Operated Calcium Channels in Somato-Dendritic Oxytocin Release , 2011, PloS one.

[32]  D. J. MacGregor,et al.  A new method of spike modelling and interval analysis , 2009, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[33]  R. Bicknell Optimizing release from peptide hormone secretory nerve terminals. , 1988, The Journal of experimental biology.

[34]  C. Bourque Calcium-dependent spike after-current induces burst firing in magnocellular neurosecretory cells , 1986, Neuroscience Letters.

[35]  E. Tribollet,et al.  Mammalian endocrine neurones: Control of phasic activity by antidromic action potentials , 1976, Neuroscience Letters.