A general approach to modeling biphasic relationships.

Biphasic relationships can be found throughout the sciences, especially in the dose-response relationships of pharmacology, toxicology, agriculture, and nutrition. Accurate modeling of biphasic dose-response is an essential step in establishing effective guidelines for the protection of human and ecosystem health, yet currently-used biphasic mathematical models lack biological rationale and fit only limited sets of biphasic data. To model biphasic relationships more closely over wider ranges of exposures, we suggest a simple, general, biologically reasonable modeling approach leading to a family of mathematical models that combine log-logistic functions: at least one for the upslope and one forthe downslope of the biphasic relationship. All parameters employed are meaningfully interpretable. These models can be used to test for the presence of biphasic effects, and they simplify to a standard log-logistic model in the special case where no biphasic effect can be detected. They offer the promise of improvement in assessment of the safety and efficacy of pharmaceuticals and nutrients as well as in determination of the toxicity of contaminants. Additionally, they may be useful in modeling nonmonotonic cause-effect relationships in other scientific disciplines.

[1]  J. Connell Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. , 1978, Science.

[2]  B. E. Saltzman Health risk assessment of fluctuating concentrations using lognormal models. , 1997, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[3]  G. Lip,et al.  Antithrombotic therapy for atrial fibrillation , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[4]  W. S. Miller,et al.  Biphasic Action of Penicillin and other Sulphonamide Similarity , 1945, Nature.

[5]  A. Norman,et al.  Vitamin D: metabolism and biological actions. , 1984, Annual review of nutrition.

[6]  W. Stahel,et al.  Log-normal Distributions across the Sciences: Keys and Clues , 2001 .

[7]  Christian Ritz,et al.  Improved empirical models describing hormesis , 2005, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[8]  W. Ott A physical explanation of the lognormality of pollutant concentrations. , 1990, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[9]  V. Palace,et al.  Developmental effects of bioaccumulated selenium in eggs and larvae of two salmonid species , 2005, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[10]  C. Wade,et al.  Results of a two-year chronic toxicity and oncogenicity study of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in rats. , 1978, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[11]  Oliver Schabenberger,et al.  Statistical Tests for Hormesis and Effective Dosages in Herbicide Dose Response , 1999 .

[12]  J W Hilton,et al.  The requirement and toxicity of selenium in rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri). , 1980, The Journal of nutrition.

[13]  J. Hoekstra,et al.  Calculation of the EC50 and its confidence interval when subtoxic stimulus is present. , 1993, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[14]  Dale Bowman,et al.  A Parametric Model for Detecting Hormetic Effects in Developmental Toxicity Studies , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[15]  N. Jablonski,et al.  The evolution of human skin coloration. , 2000, Journal of human evolution.

[16]  R. Yerkes,et al.  The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit‐formation , 1908 .

[17]  R. Marcel Species diversity of plant communities on calcareous screes: the role of intermediate disturbance , 2004 .

[18]  A. John Bailer,et al.  Estimating inhibition concentrations for different response scales using generalized linear models , 1997 .

[19]  David J. Hoffman,et al.  Impaired reproduction of mallards fed an organic form of selenium , 1989 .

[20]  The individual tolerance concept is not the sole explanation for the probit dose‐effect model , 2000 .

[21]  R. Conolly,et al.  Nonmonotonic dose-response relationships: mechanistic basis, kinetic modeling, and implications for risk assessment. , 2004, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[22]  J. E. Jensen,et al.  Log-Logistic Analysis of Herbicide Dose-Response Relationships , 1995, Weed Technology.

[23]  A. Brazzale,et al.  Effects of dinoseb on the life cycle of Daphnia magna: Modeling survival time and a proposal for an alternative to the no‐observed‐effect concentration , 2002, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[24]  F. J. Nutman,et al.  Stimulation of two pathogenic fungi by high dilutions of fungicides , 1962 .

[25]  G. Csaba,et al.  Effect of hormones on protozoa. Studies on the phagocytotic effect of histamine, 5 hydroxytryptamine and indoleacetic acid in Tetrahymena pyriformis , 1973 .

[26]  A J Bailer,et al.  Defining the baseline for inhibition concentration calculations for hormetic hazards , 2000, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[27]  Roger D. Cousens,et al.  An equation to describe dose responses where there is stimulation of growth at low doses , 1989 .

[28]  Paracelsus,et al.  Four Treatises of Theophrastus Von Hohenheim Called Paracelsus , 1942 .

[29]  E. F. Perry,et al.  Cardiovascular actions of cadmium at environmental exposure levels. , 1982, Science.