Communication roles that support collaboration during the design process

Abstract It is widely acknowledged that design (and development) teams increasingly include participants from different domains who must explore and integrate their specialized knowledge in order to create innovative and competitive artefacts and reduce design and development costs. Thus communication, including integration of specialized knowledge and negotiation of differences among domain specialists, has emerged as a fundamental component of the design process. This paper presents 13 communication roles that emerged during four multidisciplinary design situations in the USA and Europe. These roles supported knowledge exploration and integration, collaboration, and task and project completion by filtering and providing information and negotiating differences across organizational, task, discipline and personal boundaries. Implications for design methods, tools and education are discussed.

[1]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  Retrieval techniques , 1987 .

[2]  Susan T. Dumais,et al.  Learned Vector-Space Models for Document Retrieval , 1995, Inf. Process. Manag..

[3]  Dorothy Leonard-Barton,et al.  The case for integrative innovation: an expert system at Digital , 1993 .

[4]  W. Bruce Croft,et al.  TREC and Tipster Experiments with Inquery , 1995, Inf. Process. Manag..

[5]  T. Allen.  Managing the flow of technology , 1977 .

[6]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Cognitive Systems Engineering , 2022 .

[7]  Louis L. Bucciarelli,et al.  An ethnographic perspective on engineering design , 1988 .

[8]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Bridging the Boundary: External Activity and Performance in Organizational Teams. , 1992 .

[9]  Brent D. Ruben,et al.  Mediation, Information, and Communication , 1990 .

[10]  Enid Mumford,et al.  Defining System Requirements to Meet Business Needs: A Case Study Example , 1985, Comput. J..

[11]  Diane H. Sonnenwald.  Communication in design , 1993 .

[12]  Martha E. Williams.  Annual review of information science and technology, vol. 22 , 1987 .

[13]  Diane Baker Walz.  A longitudinal study of the group design process , 1988 .

[14]  B. Fisher.  Small Group Decision Making: Communication and the Group Process , 1980 .

[15]  Donald A. Schön.  Designing as reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation , 1992, Knowl. Based Syst..

[16]  Mineki Hattori.  Computer-aided architectural design in Japan of the nineteen-eighties , 1984 .

[17]  Randall R. Steffan Mpa Che,et al.  Mintzberg on Management , 1997 .

[18]  Stephanie W. Haas,et al.  Sublanguage terms: dictionaries, usage, and automatic classification , 1995 .

[19]  Bill Curtis,et al.  A field study of the software design process for large systems , 1988, CACM.

[20]  Edward Yourdon,et al.  Managing the system life cycle , 1988 .

[21]  M. Tushman.  Special Boundary Roles in the Innovation Process. , 1977 .

[22]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  On the Essential Contexts of Artifacts or on the Proposition That "Design Is Making Sense (Of Things)" , 1989 .

[23]  Chengzhi Peng,et al.  Exploring communication in collaborative design: co-operative architectural modelling , 1994 .

[24]  S Medhat.  A COMPUTATIONAL MODEL FOR MULTI-AGENT INTERACTION IN CONCURRENT ENGINEERING , 1994 .

[25]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Coordination in software development , 1995, CACM.

[26]  Diane H. Sonnenwald,et al.  Contested Collaboration: A Descriptive Model of Intergroup Communication in Information System Design , 1995, Inf. Process. Manag..

[27]  Diane H. Sonnenwald.  Intergroup communication in design: a pilot study , 1992 .

[28]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  Small Group Design Meetings: An Analysis of Collaboration , 1992, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[29]  Enid Mumford,et al.  XSEL's Progress: The Continuing Journey of an Expert System , 1989 .