Clinical evaluation of atlas and deep learning based automatic contouring for lung cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Contouring of organs at risk (OARs) is an important but time consuming part of radiotherapy treatment planning. The aim of this study was to investigate whether using institutional created software-generated contouring will save time if used as a starting point for manual OAR contouring for lung cancer patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS Twenty CT scans of stage I-III NSCLC patients were used to compare user adjusted contours after an atlas-based and deep learning contour, against manual delineation. The lungs, esophagus, spinal cord, heart and mediastinum were contoured for this study. The time to perform the manual tasks was recorded. RESULTS With a median time of 20 min for manual contouring, the total median time saved was 7.8 min when using atlas-based contouring and 10 min for deep learning contouring. Both atlas based and deep learning adjustment times were significantly lower than manual contouring time for all OARs except for the left lung and esophagus of the atlas based contouring. CONCLUSIONS User adjustment of software generated contours is a viable strategy to reduce contouring time of OARs for lung radiotherapy while conforming to local clinical standards. In addition, deep learning contouring shows promising results compared to existing solutions.

[1]  Jialin Peng,et al.  Automatic 3D liver segmentation based on deep learning and globally optimized surface evolution , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  B Haas,et al.  Automatic segmentation of thoracic and pelvic CT images for radiotherapy planning using implicit anatomic knowledge and organ-specific segmentation strategies , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  João Manuel R. S. Tavares,et al.  Novel and powerful 3D adaptive crisp active contour method applied in the segmentation of CT lung images , 2017, Medical Image Anal..

[4]  Joshua D. Lawson,et al.  Evaluation of automatic atlas-based lymph node segmentation for head-and-neck cancer. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  Philippe Lambin,et al.  PET-CT-based auto-contouring in non-small-cell lung cancer correlates with pathology and reduces interobserver variability in the delineation of the primary tumor and involved nodal volumes. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Deep Learning , 2015, Nature.

[7]  S. Ryu,et al.  SU-F-J-113: Multi-Atlas Based Automatic Organ Segmentation for Lung Radiotherapy Planning. , 2016, Medical physics.

[8]  Jeffrey Cao,et al.  The Impact of Peer Review of Volume Delineation in Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Planning for Primary Lung Cancer: A Multicenter Quality Assurance Study , 2014, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[9]  Eduard Schreibmann,et al.  Multiatlas segmentation of thoracic and abdominal anatomy with level set‐based local search , 2014, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[10]  G. Sharp,et al.  Vision 20/20: perspectives on automated image segmentation for radiotherapy. , 2014, Medical physics.

[11]  Stewart Gaede,et al.  Inter-observer and intra-observer reliability for lung cancer target volume delineation in the 4D-CT era. , 2010, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[12]  Albert K. Hoang Duc,et al.  Validation of clinical acceptability of an atlas-based segmentation algorithm for the delineation of organs at risk in head and neck cancer. , 2015, Medical physics.

[13]  W. Tomé,et al.  Variations in the contouring of organs at risk: test case from a patient with oropharyngeal cancer. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  M. Leech,et al.  Use of auto-segmentation in the delineation of target volumes and organs at risk in head and neck , 2016, Acta oncologica.

[15]  T Kadir,et al.  TU-AB-202-10: How Effective Are Current Atlas Selection Methods for Atlas-Based Auto-Contouring in Radiotherapy Planning? , 2016, Medical physics.

[16]  Lei Dong,et al.  Automatic segmentation of whole breast using atlas approach and deformable image registration. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  Kenji Suzuki,et al.  Overview of deep learning in medical imaging , 2017, Radiological Physics and Technology.

[18]  Xinjian Chen,et al.  Single-Channel Sparse Non-Negative Blind Source Separation Method for Automatic 3-D Delineation of Lung Tumor in PET Images , 2017, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[19]  Masahiro Oda,et al.  Automatic segmentation of airway tree based on local intensity filter and machine learning technique in 3D chest CT volume , 2017, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[20]  Jinke Wang,et al.  Automatic Approach for Lung Segmentation with Juxta-Pleural Nodules from Thoracic CT Based on Contour Tracing and Correction , 2016, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[21]  Iddo Wernick,et al.  Atlas-based segmentation improves consistency and decreases time required for contouring postoperative endometrial cancer nodal volumes. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[22]  L. Holloway,et al.  Uncertainties in volume delineation in radiation oncology: A systematic review and recommendations for future studies. , 2016, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[23]  M Vermandel,et al.  Interactive contour delineation of organs at risk in radiotherapy: Clinical evaluation on NSCLC patients. , 2016, Medical physics.

[24]  I. Yeo,et al.  SU-F-J-114: On-Treatment Imagereconstruction Using Transit Images of Treatment Beams Through Patient and Thosethrough Planning CT Images. , 2016, Medical physics.