Being, Having, Doing, and Interacting: A Personal Informatics Approach to Understanding Human Need Satisfaction in Everyday Life

A grand challenge for computing is to better understand fundamental human needs and their satisfaction. In this work, we design a personal informatics technology probe that scaffolds reflection on how time-use satisfies Max-Neef’s fundamental needs of being, having, doing, and interacting via self-aspects, relationships and organizations, activities, and environments. Through a combination of a think-aloud study (N = 10) and a week-long in situ deployment (N = 7), participants used the probe to complete self- aspect elicitation and Day Reconstruction Method tasks. Participants then interacted with network visualizations of their daily lives, and discovered insights about their lives. During the study, we collected a dataset of 662 activities annotated with need satisfaction ratings. Despite challenges in operationalizing a theory of need through direct elicitation from individuals, personal informatics systems show potential as a participatory and individually meaningful approach for understanding need satisfaction in everyday life.

[1]  Stephen Voida,et al.  Tracking the Experience of Self in Everyday Life , 2023, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[2]  J. Priebe,et al.  Validation of an Automated Wearable Camera-Based Image-Assisted Recall Method and the 24-h Recall Method for Assessing Women’s Time Allocation in a Nutritionally Vulnerable Population: The Case of Rural Uganda , 2022, Nutrients.

[3]  M. Hennink,et al.  Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. , 2021, Social science & medicine.

[4]  Andrés Lucero,et al.  Data Agents: Promoting Reflection through Meaningful Representations of Personal Data in Everyday Life , 2021, CHI.

[5]  Pawel W. Wozniak,et al.  The Technology-Mediated Reflection Model: Barriers and Assistance in Data-Driven Reflection , 2021, CHI.

[6]  Mikołaj P. Woźniak,et al.  The Development and Validation of the Technology-Supported Reflection Inventory , 2021, CHI.

[7]  M. Sahakian,et al.  Consumption Corridors , 2021 .

[8]  L. Smyth,et al.  Structure, Content and Inter‐relationships between Self‐aspects: Integrating Findings from the Social Identity and Self Complexity Traditions , 2021, European Journal of Social Psychology.

[9]  Yunan Chen,et al.  Mapping and Taking Stock of the Personal Informatics Literature , 2020, Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol..

[10]  Sachin R. Pendse,et al.  Sochiatrist: Signals of Affect in Messaging Data , 2020 .

[11]  Ian Gough,et al.  Defining floors and ceilings: the contribution of human needs theory , 2020, Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy.

[12]  William D. Ellison,et al.  For whom, and for what, is experience sampling more accurate than retrospective report? , 2020 .

[13]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Population-Scale Study of Human Needs During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Analysis and Implications , 2020, WSDM.

[14]  Luca Pappalardo,et al.  Measuring objective and subjective well-being: dimensions and data sources , 2020, International Journal of Data Science and Analytics.

[15]  Elisa D. Mekler,et al.  Self-Determination Theory in HCI Games Research: Current Uses and Open Questions , 2020, CHI.

[16]  William F. Lamb,et al.  Your money or your life? The carbon-development paradox , 2020, Environmental Research Letters.

[17]  Alain Guerrien,et al.  A systematic review and meta-analysis on basic psychological need satisfaction, motivation, and well-being in later life: Contributions of self-determination theory. , 2019, PsyCh journal.

[18]  R. Ryan,et al.  Basic psychological need theory: Advancements, critical themes, and future directions , 2020, Motivation and Emotion.

[19]  E. Deci,et al.  Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction and Frustration Scale , 2019 .

[20]  Matthew J. Salganik,et al.  Bit by bit: social research in the digital age , 2019, The Journal of mathematical sociology.

[21]  Aaron Marcus,et al.  Seven HCI Grand Challenges , 2019, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[22]  Chuc Nguyen Dinh,et al.  Needs-Based Workshops for Sustainable Consumption and Production in Vietnam , 2019, Sustainable Design and Manufacturing 2019.

[23]  A. Bauman,et al.  A short history of time use research; implications for public health , 2019, BMC Public Health.

[24]  Ellen Riloff,et al.  Improving Human Needs Categorization of Events with Semantic Classification , 2019, *SEMEVAL.

[25]  Elena Agapie,et al.  Designing for the Self: Enabling People to Design Behavioral Interventions , 2019, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[26]  Anette Frank,et al.  Ranking and Selecting Multi-Hop Knowledge Paths to Better Predict Human Needs , 2019, NAACL.

[27]  E. Deci,et al.  Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction at Work Scale , 2019 .

[28]  L. Arends,et al.  Using the Day Reconstruction Method - Same Results when Used at the End of the Day or on the Next Day? , 2019, International Journal of Community Well-Being.

[29]  E. Hertwich,et al.  Connecting global emissions to fundamental human needs and their satisfaction , 2019, Environmental Research Letters.

[30]  Bongshin Lee,et al.  People Like Me , 2018, Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol..

[31]  Ellen Riloff,et al.  Human Needs Categorization of Affective Events Using Labeled and Unlabeled Data , 2018, NAACL.

[32]  Amid Ayobi,et al.  Informing the Design of Personal Informatics Technologies for Unpredictable Chronic Conditions , 2018, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[33]  Amon Rapp,et al.  Know Thyself: A Theory of the Self for Personal Informatics , 2017, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[34]  Bongshin Lee,et al.  OmniTrack , 2017, Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol..

[35]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness , 2017 .

[36]  Kimberly Fisher,et al.  Using New Technologies for Time Diary Data Collection: Instrument Design and Data Quality Findings from a Mixed-Mode Pilot Survey , 2017, Social indicators research.

[37]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Grand challenges for HCI researchers , 2016, Interactions.

[38]  Bongshin Lee,et al.  TimeAware: Leveraging Framing Effects to Enhance Personal Productivity , 2016, CHI.

[39]  Vaiva Kalnikaité,et al.  'Don't Waste My Time': Use of Time Information Improves Focus , 2016, CHI.

[40]  Kasper Hornbæk,et al.  Momentary Pleasure or Lasting Meaning?: Distinguishing Eudaimonic and Hedonic User Experiences , 2016, CHI.

[41]  David S. Kirk,et al.  It's Just My History Isn't It?: Understanding Smart Journaling Practices , 2016, CHI.

[42]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Qualitative HCI Research: Going Behind the Scenes , 2016, Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics.

[43]  Anna Monreale,et al.  A risk model for privacy in trajectory data , 2015, Journal of Trust Management.

[44]  Lawrence R. Ness,et al.  Are We There Yet - Data Saturation in Qualitative Research (TQR Published).pdf , 2015 .

[45]  Sean A. Munson,et al.  A lived informatics model of personal informatics , 2015, UbiComp.

[46]  Paul Davidsson,et al.  Analyzing the Design Space of Personal Informatics: A State-of-practice Based Classification of Existing Tools , 2015, HCI.

[47]  Joemon M. Jose,et al.  "My Day in Review": Visually Summarising Noisy Lifelog Data , 2015, ICMR.

[48]  Bongshin Lee,et al.  Characterizing Visualization Insights from Quantified Selfers' Personal Data Presentations , 2015, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[49]  Klaus Opwis,et al.  Facets In HCI: Towards Understanding Eudaimonic UX -- Preliminary Findings , 2015, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[50]  James Fogarty,et al.  Rethinking the Mobile Food Journal: Exploring Opportunities for Lightweight Photo-Based Capture , 2015, CHI.

[51]  Terry Irwin,et al.  Transition Design: A Proposal for a New Area of Design Practice, Study, and Research , 2015 .

[52]  Bon Adriel Aseniero,et al.  Personal Visualization and Personal Visual Analytics , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[53]  Cameron Tonkinwise,et al.  Transition design provocation , 2015 .

[54]  Gideon Kossoff Holism and the reconstitution of everyday life: a framework for transition to a sustainable society , 2015 .

[55]  Jon Bird,et al.  Barriers to engagement with a personal informatics productivity tool , 2014, OZCHI.

[56]  D. Fuchs,et al.  Sustainable consumption corridors : concept, objections, and responses , 2014 .

[57]  Sebastian Deterding,et al.  Eudaimonic Design, or: Six Invitations to Rethink Gamification , 2014 .

[58]  Wanda Pratt,et al.  Understanding quantified-selfers' practices in collecting and exploring personal data , 2014, CHI.

[59]  M. Porter,et al.  Social Progress Index 2014 , 2014 .

[60]  Salvatore Monni,et al.  Beyond GDP and HDI: Shifting the focus from paradigms to politics , 2013 .

[61]  Katie Shilton,et al.  Participatory personal data: An emerging research challenge for the information sciences , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[62]  Sunny Consolvo,et al.  Lullaby: a capture & access system for understanding the sleep environment , 2012, UbiComp.

[63]  Eli Blevis,et al.  Collapse informatics: augmenting the sustainability & ICT4D discourse in HCI , 2012, CHI.

[64]  Tanzeem Choudhury,et al.  Passive and In-Situ assessment of mental and physical well-being using mobile sensors , 2011, UbiComp '11.

[65]  Stephen K. McLeod Knowledge of Need , 2011 .

[66]  M. Seligman Flourish: A Visionary New Understanding of Happiness and Well-being , 2011 .

[67]  Allen R McConnell,et al.  The Multiple Self-Aspects Framework: Self-Concept Representation and Its Implications , 2011, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[68]  Abigail Sellen,et al.  Beyond total capture , 2010, Commun. ACM.

[69]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  A stage-based model of personal informatics systems , 2010, CHI.

[70]  Hartley Dean,et al.  Understanding Human Need , 2010 .

[71]  John Zimmerman,et al.  Designing for the self: making products that help people become the person they desire to be , 2009, CHI.

[72]  John Zimmerman,et al.  NEW METHODS FOR THE DESIGN OF PRODUCTS THAT SUPPORT SOCIAL ROLE TRANSITIONS , 2008 .

[73]  David W. McDonald,et al.  Activity sensing in the wild: a field trial of ubifit garden , 2008, CHI.

[74]  E. Todeva Networks , 2007 .

[75]  Silvia Lindtner,et al.  Fish'n'Steps: Encouraging Physical Activity with an Interactive Computer Game , 2006, UbiComp.

[76]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Experience Sampling Method: Measuring the Quality of Everyday Life , 2006 .

[77]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Reality mining: sensing complex social systems , 2006, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[78]  Amartya Sen Human Rights and Capabilities , 2005 .

[79]  D. Kahneman,et al.  A Survey Method for Characterizing Daily Life Experience: The Day Reconstruction Method , 2004, Science.

[80]  F. Reichheld The one number you need to grow. , 2003, Harvard business review.

[81]  Allison Druin,et al.  Technology probes: inspiring design for and with families , 2003, CHI '03.

[82]  L. Sweeney,et al.  k-Anonymity: A Model for Protecting Privacy , 2002, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst..

[83]  Kenneth K Wiscomb From the outside looking in. , 2002, JAAPA : official journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants.

[84]  E. Deci,et al.  On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. , 2001, Annual review of psychology.

[85]  Martha Craven Nussbaum,et al.  Women's Capabilities and Social Justice , 2000 .

[86]  S. Dodds,et al.  Towards a ‘science of sustainability’: Improving the way ecological economics understands human well-being , 1997 .

[87]  W. Velicer,et al.  The Transtheoretical Model of Health Behavior Change , 1997, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[88]  Cathleen Wharton,et al.  Toward an HCI research and practice agenda based on human needs and social responsibility , 1997, CHI.

[89]  Manfred A. Max-Neef Human Scale Development: Conception, Application and Further Reflections , 1989 .

[90]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Validity and Reliability of the Experience‐Sampling Method , 1987, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[91]  P. Linville,et al.  Self-complexity as a cognitive buffer against stress-related illness and depression. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[92]  P. Linville,et al.  Self-complexity and affective extremity: Don't put all of your eggs in one cognitive basket. , 1985 .

[93]  G. H. Brundtland World Commission on environment and development , 1985 .

[94]  E. Trewhitt,et al.  SatisfAI: A Serious Tabletop Game to Reveal Human-AI Interaction Dynamics , 2022, HCI.

[95]  Julia K. Steinberger,et al.  A Framework for Decoupling Human Need Satisfaction From Energy Use , 2017 .

[96]  Kai Zheng,et al.  Mobile apps for mood tracking: an analysis of features and user reviews , 2017, AMIA.

[97]  Jakob Eg Larsen,et al.  QS Spiral: Visualizing Periodic Quantified Self Data , 2013 .

[98]  Jeffrey Heer,et al.  D³ Data-Driven Documents , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[99]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Social fMRI: Investigating and shaping social mechanisms in the real world , 2011, Pervasive Mob. Comput..

[100]  Richard M. Ryan,et al.  What is being optimized?: Self-determination theory and basic psychological needs. , 2000 .

[101]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Well-being : the foundations of hedonic psychology , 1999 .

[102]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[103]  C. Showers,et al.  Compartmentalization of positive and negative self-knowledge: keeping bad apples out of the bunch. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[104]  L. Doyal,et al.  A Theory of Human Need , 1991 .

[105]  A. Maslow Motivation and Personality , 1954 .

[106]  A. Maslow A Theory of Human Motivation , 1943 .

[107]  E.,et al.  Self-Discrepancy : A Theory Relating Self and Affect , 2022 .