Use of three-dimensional ultrasound in the detection of breast tumor bed displacement during radiotherapy.

PURPOSE To evaluate the feasibility and usefulness of a three-dimensional ultrasound (3D-US) image-guided system in identifying and tracking the tumor bed (TB) for planning and daily localization before radiation delivery for breast cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS Twenty breast cancer patients underwent two CT scans at the time of simulation and just before their boost. Three-dimensional ultrasound images were acquired immediately after the CT scans, to which the images were automatically fused. Three-dimensional ultrasound images were also acquired immediately before treatment. Spatial and temporal TB differences between CT and US were evaluated. RESULTS The TB was not visible on US and CT in 1 subject who had and 1 subject who had not received chemotherapy before whole-breast radiotherapy. The mean (SD) TB volume overlap was 78% (14%). The mean centroid position of the TB on CT vs. US differed by 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4 mm in the anterior-posterior, left-right, and superior-inferior directions. The mean (SD) absolute radial displacement of the TB on each fraction from the treatment plan was 10.8 (6.3) mm. CONCLUSIONS The TB was well visualized by US for the majority of patients. Clinically insignificant differences in the displacements calculated by paired CT vs. paired US demonstrate the feasibility of using 3D-US. The present study suggests that a 10-mm planning target volume margin could result in undercoverage of the clinical target volumes in 50% of treatments. Multimodality planning and image-guided radiotherapy with US potentially offers an accurate and non-ionizing solution for the daily definition of the TB position during partial-breast irradiation and boost treatments.

[1]  R. Collins,et al.  Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials , 2005, The Lancet.

[2]  H. Patrocinio,et al.  An assessment of PTV margin definitions for patients undergoing conformal 3D external beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer based on an analysis of 10,327 pretreatment daily ultrasound localizations. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  H. Bartelink,et al.  The influence of the boost in breast-conserving therapy on cosmetic outcome in the EORTC "boost versus no boost" trial. EORTC Radiotherapy and Breast Cancer Cooperative Groups. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  J. Bellon,et al.  Variability among breast radiation oncologists in delineation of the postsurgical lumpectomy cavity. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  K. Barker,et al.  Delayed versus immediate exercises following surgery for breast cancer: a systematic review , 2005, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[6]  Christian Carrie,et al.  Role of a 10-Gy boost in the conservative treatment of early breast cancer: results of a randomized clinical trial in Lyon, France. , 1997 .

[7]  T. Whelan,et al.  Accuracy of ultrasound in localization of breast boost field. , 2004, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[8]  M. Hilts,et al.  3D ultrasound can contribute to planning CT to define the target for partial breast radiotherapy. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  Laurence Collette,et al.  Impact of a Higher Radiation Dose on Local Control and Survival in Breast-Conserving Therapy of Early Breast Cancer: 10-Year Results of the Randomized Boost Versus No Boost EORTC 22881-10882 Trial , 2007 .

[10]  D. Yan,et al.  The validity of surgical clips as a radiographic surrogate for the lumpectomy cavity in image-guided accelerated partial breast irradiation. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  Lawrence B Marks,et al.  Definition of postlumpectomy tumor bed for radiotherapy boost field planning: CT versus surgical clips. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  I. Barillot,et al.  Effect of age and radiation dose on local control after breast conserving treatment: EORTC trial 22881-10882. , 2007, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[13]  R. Birdwell,et al.  Breast electron boost planning: comparison of CT and US. , 2001, Radiology.

[14]  Anil Sethi,et al.  Breast boost: Are we missing the target? , 2003, Cancer.

[15]  Richard W Prager,et al.  High definition three-dimensional ultrasound to localise the tumour bed: a breast radiotherapy planning study. , 2007, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[16]  K Evans,et al.  Surgical clips in planning the electron boost in breast cancer: a qualitative and quantitative evaluation. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  A. Hanlon,et al.  Does the placement of surgical clips within the excision cavity influence local control for patients treated with breast-conserving surgery and irradiation. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.