Flow, enduring, and situational involvement in the Web environment: A tripartite second-order examination

Flow, a construct borrowed from reference disciplines, has been proposed as the central process in Web navigation. However, when flow is applied directly to the context of marketing, it suffers from conceptual ambiguity and overlap with the popular marketing construct, involvement. The present study aims to provide a clear framework within which to delineate the relationship between flow and involvement, and thus develop a better theoretical basis that incorporates the flow construct into Internet marketing. This study first distinguishes explicitly between flow, enduring involvement, and situational involvement. It then operationalizes these constructs with the use of customary measures to disclose their unique and common characteristics. Finally, a second-order confirmatory factor analysis allowing measurement errors is used to identify explicitly the tripartite relationship between the three constructs. The conceptual and operational implications are discussed. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  M. Sherif,et al.  Book Reviews: The Psychology of Ego-Involvements: Social Attitudes & Identifications , 1947 .

[2]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  M. Rokeach,et al.  THE ROLE OF VALUES IN PUBLIC OPINION RESEARCH , 1968 .

[4]  J. Bettman.  Perceived Risk and Its Components: A Model and Empirical Test , 1973 .

[5]  P. Wright.  The Cognitive Processes Mediating Acceptance of Advertising , 1973 .

[6]  R. Belk.  An Exploratory Assessment of Situational Effects in Buyer Behavior , 1974 .

[7]  M. Csíkszentmihályi.  Beyond boredom and anxiety , 1975 .

[8]  M. Rothschild,et al.  Political Advertising: A Neglected Policy Issue in Marketing , 1978 .

[9]  W. W. Muir,et al.  Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity , 1980 .

[10]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[11]  Raj Arora,et al.  Validation of an S-O-R Model for Situation, Enduring, and Response Components of Involvement , 1982 .

[12]  M. Sirgy,et al.  Self-Concept in Consumer Behavior: A Critical Review , 1982 .

[13]  Peter H. Bloch,et al.  A Theoretical Model for the Study of Product Importance Perceptions , 1983 .

[14]  G. Boyle.  Critical review of state-trait curiosity test development , 1983 .

[15]  G. Privette,et al.  Peak experience, peak performance, and flow: A comparative analysis of positive human experiences. , 1983 .

[16]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Audience Involvement in Advertising: Four Levels , 1984 .

[17]  H. Marsh,et al.  Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First- and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. , 1985 .

[18]  G. Laurent,et al.  Measuring Consumer Involvement Profiles , 1985 .

[19]  J. Zaichkowsky.  Measuring the Involvement Construct , 1985 .

[20]  Daniel L. Sherrell,et al.  Consumer Search: An Extended Framework , 1986 .

[21]  André I. Khuri,et al.  Multicollinearity in marketing models: Diagnostics and remedial measures☆ , 1986 .

[22]  Peter H. Bloch,et al.  After the New Wears Off: The Temporal Context of Product Involvement , 1986 .

[23]  J. Michael Munson,et al.  The Factorial and Predictive Validities of a Revised Measure of Zaichkowsky's Personal Involvement Inventory , 1987 .

[24]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[25]  R. Belk.  Possessions and the Extended Self , 1988 .

[26]  Richard L. Celsi,et al.  The Role of Involvement in Attention and Comprehension Processes , 1988 .

[27]  Richard H. Evans,et al.  An Analysis of the Convergent and Discriminant Validity of the Personal Involvement Inventory and the Consumer Involvement Profile , 1989 .

[28]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Optimal experience in work and leisure. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[29]  Gregory J. Boyle,et al.  BREADTH-DEPTH OR STATE-TRAIT CURIOSITY - A FACTOR-ANALYSIS OF STATE TRAIT CURIOSITY AND STATE ANXIETY SCALES , 1989 .

[30]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  Lisrel 8: User's Reference Guide , 1997 .

[31]  Darrel D. Muehling,et al.  Manipulating Message Involvement in Advertising Research , 1989 .

[32]  Banwari Mittal,et al.  A causal model of consumer involvement , 1989 .

[33]  M. Csíkszentmihályi.  Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience , 1990 .

[34]  C. Roser,et al.  Involvement, Attention, and Perceptions of Message Relevance in the Response to Persuasive Appeals , 1990 .

[35]  Joseph J. Martocchio,et al.  Microcomputer playfulness: development of a measure with workplace implications , 1992 .

[36]  J. Webster,et al.  Flow in Computer-Mediated Communication , 1992 .

[37]  Edward F. McQuarrie,et al.  On Resonance: A Critical Pluralistic Inquiry into Advertising Rhetoric , 1992 .

[38]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace1 , 1992 .

[39]  Anthony G. Greenwald,et al.  Consumer involvement, message attention, and the persistence of persuasive impact in a message‐dense environment , 1993 .

[40]  Kenneth R. Lord,et al.  Attention versus distraction: The interactive effect of program involvement , 1993 .

[41]  J. Webster,et al.  The Dimensionality and Correlates of Flow in Human-Computer Interactions. , 1993 .

[42]  G. Laurent,et al.  Further evidence on the consumer involvement profile: Five antecedents of involvement , 1993 .

[43]  Ronald J. Faber,et al.  Negative Political Advertising and Voting Intent: The Role of Involvement and Alternative Information Sources , 1993 .

[44]  Kenneth C. Schneider,et al.  An empirical evaluation of the kapferer‐laurent consumer involvement profile scale , 1993 .

[45]  S. Deshpande,et al.  Task Characteristics and the Experience of Optimal Flow in Human—Computer Interaction , 1994 .

[46]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  The respective roles of perceived usefulness and perceived fun in the acceptance of microcomputer technology , 1994, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[47]  Marsha L. Richins.  Special Possessions and the Expression of Material Values , 1994 .

[48]  G. Ellis,et al.  Measurement and Analysis Issues with Explanation of Variance in Daily Experience Using the Flow Model , 1994 .

[49]  J. Zaichkowsky.  The Personal Involvement Inventory: Reduction, Revision, and Application to Advertising , 1994 .

[50]  G. Loewenstein.  The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. , 1994 .

[51]  Betty Kirkpatrick.  The concise Oxford thesaurus , 1995 .

[52]  M. Havitz,et al.  How Enduring Is Enduring Involvement? A Seasonal Examination of Three Recreational Activities , 1995 .

[53]  Dennis L. Hoffman,et al.  Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-Mediated Environments : Conceptual Foundations 1 ) , 1998 .

[54]  Cynthia M. Jackson,et al.  Toward an Understanding of the Behavioral Intention to Use an Information System , 1997 .

[55]  Rolf T. Wigand,et al.  Optimal experience of Web activities , 1999 .

[56]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[57]  Donna L. Hoffman,et al.  Measuring the Customer Experience in Online Environments: A Structural Modeling Approach , 2000 .