Do Corporate Payments Influence Research Related to the Use of Acellular Dermal Matrices in Breast Surgery?

Background: No study has assessed the impact of financial conflicts of interests (COIs) on the reporting of breast reconstruction outcomes with acellular dermal matrix (ADM) in peer-reviewed publications. The authors hypothesized that there is (1) an association between financial COIs and likelihood of studies reporting benefits in using ADM, and (2) inconsistent reporting of financial COIs. Methods: The PubMed database was used to identify articles that reported on the use of ADM in breast surgery in four leading plastic surgery journals from January of 2014 to December of 2019. Financial COIs for authors were determined using the open payments database. Results: Fifty-five articles were included. Twenty-four articles (43.6%) supported use of ADM, 12 (21.8%) did not promote ADM use, and 19 (34.5%) were neutral. Fifty-one studies (92.7%) had either a first or senior author with a COI, and authors with a COI more commonly reported positive outcomes (P = 0.02). Studies with positive outcomes featured first authors who received significantly larger financial payments ($95,955 versus $15,642; P = 0.029) compared with studies with negative or neutral outcomes. Receiver operating characteristic curve demonstrated that studies with first authors receiving over $376.28 were more likely to report positive results. Eight senior authors and three first authors received greater than $500 from ADM producers yet did not report any financial disclosure. Conclusions: Financial COI is associated with higher likelihood of studies reporting benefit of using ADM in breast surgery. There remains inconsistent reporting of COIs, and better oversight is needed to ensure unbiased publication on the use of ADM in breast surgery.

[1]  D. Ahern,et al.  Methods to Mitigate Industry Influence in Industry Sponsored Research. , 2020, Clinical spine surgery.

[2]  K. Chung,et al.  Industry Funding and Self-Declared Conflict of Interest in Hand Surgery Publications. , 2020, The Journal of hand surgery.

[3]  Mark P. MacEachern,et al.  Systematic Review of the Impact of Acellular Dermal Matrix on Aesthetics and Patient Satisfaction in Tissue Expander-to-Implant Breast Reconstructions. , 2019, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[4]  M. Shozu,et al.  Learning curve of high-complexity surgery for advanced ovarian cancer. , 2019, Gynecologic oncology.

[5]  Mark P. MacEachern,et al.  The Impact of Corporate Payments on Robotic Surgery Research: A Systematic Review , 2019, Annals of surgery.

[6]  Ricardo J. Bello,et al.  A large-volume academic center retrospective audit of the temporal evolution of immediate breast reconstruction protocols and the effect on breast prosthetic infection. , 2019, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[7]  Ilana G. Margulies,et al.  The use of acellular dermal matrix in breast reconstruction: evolution of techniques over 2 decades , 2019, Gland Surgery.

[8]  T. Myckatyn,et al.  Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with Acellular Dermal Matrix: A Comparison of Sterile and Aseptic AlloDerm in 2039 Consecutive Cases , 2018, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[9]  J. Schwarzbauer,et al.  Impact of Acellular Dermal Matrix on Postsurgical Wound Fluid Biomarkers in Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction , 2018, Annals of plastic surgery.

[10]  A. Momeni,et al.  Hybrid Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Surgical Approach that Combines the Benefits of Autologous and Implant-Based Reconstruction , 2018, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[11]  D. Mills,et al.  Poly-4-Hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) Scaffold Internal Support: Preliminary Experience with Direct Implant Opposition During Complex Breast Revisions. , 2018, Aesthetic surgery journal.

[12]  Matthew R. Neville,et al.  Author Disclosures in Plastic Surgery Journals Compared With Information Reported in the Open Payments Database: How Open Are We? , 2018, Aesthetic surgery journal.

[13]  J. Luan,et al.  Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Expander/Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Multicenter Assessment of Risks and Benefits. , 2018, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[14]  J. Boughey,et al.  Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy , 2018, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[15]  J. May,et al.  The Accuracy of Conflict-of-Interest Disclosures Reported by Plastic Surgeons and Industry , 2018, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[16]  Paul D. Smith,et al.  Moffitt Cancer Center Experience of Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: Does Acellular Dermal Matrix Increase Return to the Operating Room? , 2018, Annals of plastic surgery.

[17]  Henry B Wilson,et al.  Evaluation of Modifications to Tissue-Expander Breast Reconstruction, a Quality Improvement Assessment Within a Private Practice , 2018, Annals of plastic surgery.

[18]  Jun Liu,et al.  Aseptic Freeze-Dried versus Sterile Wet-Packaged Human Cadaveric Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: A Propensity Score Analysis , 2018, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[19]  A. Gabriel,et al.  Prepectoral Revision Breast Reconstruction for Treatment of Implant-Associated Animation Deformity: A Review of 102 Reconstructions , 2018, Aesthetic surgery journal.

[20]  J. May,et al.  Plastic Surgeons’ Perceptions of Financial Conflicts of Interest and the Sunshine Act , 2018, Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open.

[21]  Bernard T. Lee,et al.  Evaluation of Contralateral and Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy and Reconstruction Outcomes: Comparing Alloplastic and Autologous Reconstruction , 2018, Annals of plastic surgery.

[22]  J. Gatherwright,et al.  Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction in Women Older than 65 Years: A Retrospective Analysis of Complication Rate and Overall Outcomes , 2018, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[23]  Benedict U. Nwachukwu,et al.  Accuracy Between AJSM Author-Reported Disclosures and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Open Payments Database , 2018, The American journal of sports medicine.

[24]  M. Nahabedian,et al.  Two-Stage Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction: A Comparison Between Prepectoral and Partial Subpectoral Techniques , 2017, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[25]  E. Elwood,et al.  Prepectoral Immediate Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction with Anterior AlloDerm Coverage , 2017, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[26]  D. Wagner,et al.  Surgeon-Controlled Comparison of Direct-to-Implant and 2-Stage Tissue Expander–Implant Immediate Breast Reconstruction Outcomes , 2017, Annals of plastic surgery.

[27]  H. Sbitany,et al.  Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Safe Alternative to Submuscular Prosthetic Reconstruction following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy , 2017, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[28]  B. Rinker,et al.  Dermal Autograft Using Donor Breast as Alternative to Acellular Dermal Matrices in Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Review , 2017, Annals of plastic surgery.

[29]  Gordon K. Lee,et al.  Management of Mastectomy Skin Necrosis in Implant Based Breast Reconstruction , 2017, Annals of plastic surgery.

[30]  H. Orbay,et al.  Comparison of two cadaveric acellular dermal matrices for immediate breast reconstruction: A prospective randomized trial. , 2017, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[31]  S. Spear,et al.  Comparison of Different Acellular Dermal Matrices in Breast Reconstruction: The 50/50 Study , 2017, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[32]  A. Gabriel,et al.  Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Rationale, Indications, and Preliminary Results , 2017, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[33]  A. Kolker,et al.  Extended Submuscular Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with Pectoralis-Serratus Sling and Acellular Dermal Matrix , 2016, Aesthetic surgery journal.

[34]  Wei Jiang,et al.  Predictors of Complications and Comparison of Outcomes Using SurgiMend Fetal Bovine and AlloDerm Human Cadaveric Acellular Dermal Matrices in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction , 2016, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[35]  E. Liao,et al.  Abstract: Surgeon-Controlled Study and Meta-Analysis Comparing FlexHD and AlloDerm in Immediate Breast Reconstruction Outcomes , 2016, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[36]  A. Ashikari,et al.  Acellular Dermal Matrix–Assisted Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction and Capsular Contracture: A 13-Year Experience , 2016, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[37]  M. Alperovich,et al.  “Breast in a Day”: Examining Single-Stage Immediate, Permanent Implant Reconstruction in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy , 2016, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[38]  A. Chao,et al.  Industry Financial Relationships in Plastic Surgery: Analysis of the Sunshine Act Open Payments Database , 2016, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[39]  J. May,et al.  The Impact of Financial Conflicts of Interest in Plastic Surgery: Are They All Created Equal? , 2016, Annals of plastic surgery.

[40]  R. Aft,et al.  Uneventful versus Successful Reconstruction and Outcome Pathways in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with Acellular Dermal Matrices , 2016, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[41]  L. Esserman,et al.  Tissue Expander Reconstruction After Total Skin-Sparing Mastectomy: Defining the Effects of Coverage Technique on Nipple/Areola Preservation , 2016, Annals of plastic surgery.

[42]  Abigail E. Chaffin,et al.  Refinements in the Techniques of 2-Stage Breast Reconstruction , 2016, Annals of plastic surgery.

[43]  R. Kalus,et al.  Optimizing Safety, Predictability, and Aesthetics in Direct to Implant Immediate Breast Reconstruction: Evolution of Surgical Technique , 2016, Annals of plastic surgery.

[44]  A. Colwell,et al.  Revisions in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: How Does Direct-to-Implant Measure Up? , 2016, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[45]  D. Nguyen,et al.  Double-Chamber Tissue Expanders Optimize Lower Pole Expansion in Immediate Breast Reconstruction Requiring Adjuvant Radiation Therapy , 2016, Annals of plastic surgery.

[46]  S. Agrawal,et al.  The Physician Payments Sunshine Act--Two Years of the Open Payments Program. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[47]  A. Gabriel,et al.  Bioengineered Breast: Concept, Technique, and Preliminary Results , 2016, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[48]  J. May,et al.  Financial Conflicts of Interest: An Association between Funding and Findings in Plastic Surgery , 2015, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[49]  Donald S. Mowlds,et al.  Capsular Contracture in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Examining the Role of Acellular Dermal Matrix Fenestrations , 2015, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[50]  K. Ranganathan,et al.  Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: Are All Acellular Dermal Matrices Created Equal? , 2015, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[51]  M. Codner,et al.  Embrace the Change: Incorporating Single-Stage Implant Breast Reconstruction into Your Practice , 2015, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[52]  C. Deeken,et al.  Histologic, Molecular, and Clinical Evaluation of Explanted Breast Prostheses, Capsules, and Acellular Dermal Matrices for Bacteria. , 2015, Aesthetic surgery journal.

[53]  P. Garvey,et al.  Critical Evaluation of Risk Factors and Early Complications in 564 Consecutive Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstructions Using Acellular Dermal Matrix at a Single Center , 2015, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[54]  J. Baty,et al.  Remodeling Characteristics and Collagen Distributions of Biologic Scaffold Materials Biopsied From Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction Sites , 2015, Annals of plastic surgery.

[55]  Briar L. Dent,et al.  Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy via an Inframammary Fold Incision with Implant-Based Reconstruction in Patients with Prior Cosmetic Breast Surgery. , 2015, Aesthetic surgery journal.

[56]  M. Chung,et al.  A Comparison of Dermal Autograft and Acellular Dermal Matrix in Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: Long-term Aesthetic Outcomes and Capsular Contracture , 2015, Annals of plastic surgery.

[57]  Gennaya L. Mattison,et al.  Reducing Postoperative Infections and Red Breast Syndrome in Patients With Acellular Dermal Matrix–Based Breast Reconstruction: The Relative Roles of Product Sterility and Lower Body Mass Index , 2015, Annals of plastic surgery.

[58]  E. Luce.  Financial conflicts of interest in plastic surgery: background, potential for bias, disclosure, and transparency. , 2015, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[59]  L. Esserman,et al.  The Impact of Breast Mass on Outcomes of Total Skin-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Tissue Expander–Based Breast Reconstruction , 2015, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[60]  N. Fine,et al.  SERI Surgical Scaffold, Prospective Clinical Trial of a Silk-Derived Biological Scaffold in Two-Stage Breast Reconstruction: 1-Year Data , 2015, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[61]  L. Neumayer,et al.  The Breast Reconstruction Evaluation of Acellular Dermal Matrix as a Sling Trial (BREASTrial): Design and Methods of a Prospective Randomized Trial , 2015, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[62]  B. Matthews,et al.  The Impact of Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy on the Remodeling of Acellular Dermal Matrices in Staged, Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction , 2015, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[63]  L. Neumayer,et al.  The BREASTrial: Stage I. Outcomes from the Time of Tissue Expander and Acellular Dermal Matrix Placement to Definitive Reconstruction , 2015, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[64]  G. Wirth,et al.  Use of Fenestrations in Acellular Dermal Allograft in Two-Stage Tissue Expander/Implant Breast Reconstruction , 2014, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[65]  D. F. Haynes,et al.  Vicryl Mesh in Expander/Implant Breast Reconstruction: Long-Term Follow-Up in 38 Patients , 2014, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[66]  M. Sisco,et al.  Complication prevalence following use of tutoplast-derived human acellular dermal matrix in prosthetic breast reconstruction: a retrospective review of 203 patients. , 2014, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[67]  M. Alperovich,et al.  Reconstructive approach for patients with augmentation mammaplasty undergoing nipple-sparing mastectomy. , 2014, Aesthetic surgery journal.

[68]  J. Kim,et al.  An Algorithmic Approach for Selective Acellular Dermal Matrix Use in Immediate Two-Stage Breast Reconstruction: Indications and Outcomes , 2014, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[69]  J. May,et al.  The Impact of Conflicts of Interest in Plastic Surgery: An Analysis of Acellular Dermal Matrix, Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction , 2014, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[70]  J. Chi.  Exposing conflicts of interest and complications of rhBMP-2. , 2011, Neurosurgery.

[71]  K. Chung,et al.  How to practice evidence-based medicine. , 2010, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[72]  E Ray Dorsey,et al.  Funding of US biomedical research, 2003-2008. , 2010, JAMA.

[73]  R. Rosenthal,et al.  Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[74]  E. Winer,et al.  Association between pharmaceutical involvement and outcomes in breast cancer clinical trials , 2007, Cancer.

[75]  M. Bhandari,et al.  Conflict of interest in orthopaedic research. An association between findings and funding in scientific presentations. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[76]  Christopher F. Martin,et al.  Association of industry sponsorship to published outcomes in gastrointestinal clinical research. , 2006, Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.

[77]  L. Hirsch.  Randomized clinical trials: what gets published, and when? , 2004, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[78]  Emil H Schemitsch,et al.  Association between industry funding and statistically significant pro-industry findings in medical and surgical randomized trials. , 2004, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[79]  Christian Gluud,et al.  Association of funding and conclusions in randomized drug trials: a reflection of treatment effect or adverse events? , 2003, JAMA.

[80]  C. Gross,et al.  Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: a systematic review. , 2003, JAMA.

[81]  L. Kjaergard,et al.  Association between competing interests and authors' conclusions: epidemiological study of randomised clinical trials published in the BMJ , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[82]  A. Wazana,et al.  Physicians and the pharmaceutical industry: is a gift ever just a gift? , 2000, JAMA.

[83]  Melissa S. Anderson,et al.  Withholding research results in academic life science. Evidence from a national survey of faculty. , 1997, JAMA.

[84]  D Blumenthal,et al.  Relationships between academic institutions and industry in the life sciences--an industry survey. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[85]  J. Orlowski,et al.  The effects of pharmaceutical firm enticements on physician prescribing patterns. There's no such thing as a free lunch. , 1992, Chest.

[86]  Torsten B. Moeller,et al.  Books Received Pocket Atlas of Sectional Anatomy — Volume I : Head and Neck : 4th Edition Copyright © North American Neuro- O phthalmology Society . Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited . , 2018 .

[87]  A. Ashikari,et al.  Short-Term Complications Associated With Acellular Dermal Matrix-Assisted Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction , 2017, Annals of plastic surgery.

[88]  M. Hicks,et al.  Further evidence that human acellular dermal matrix decreases inflammatory markers of capsule formation in implant-based breast reconstruction. , 2015, Aesthetic surgery journal.

[89]  J. Kestle.  Clinical Trials , 2014, World Journal of Surgery.

[90]  Jason I Reminick,et al.  Funding of US Biomedical Research , 2011 .

[91]  E. Wager.  Depressing research. , 2004, Lancet.

[92]  R. Rosenheck,et al.  Quantitative analysis of sponsorship bias in economic studies of antidepressants. , 2003, The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science.