Belief Function Approach to Evidential Reasoning in Causal Maps

The purpose of this chapter is to demonstrate the use of evidential reasoning approach under Dempster-Shafer (D-S) theory of belief functions to analyze revealed causal maps. Revealed causal mapping (RCM) technique, as applied in this chapter, is a qualitative method used to develop or extend understanding of a phenomenon within a specific context. The map can be used to develop models, either as grounded theory or evocative theory building. The example referenced in this study used interview data as the primary source in the RCM method. The participants from information technology (IT) organizations provided the concepts to describe the target phenomenon of Job Satisfaction; they also identified the associations between the concepts. The researchers used coding rules to aggregate similar concepts to produce a composite RCM. The researchers proposed potential evidence measures that could be used to evaluate the model. This chapter discusses the steps necessary to transform a causal map into an evidential diagram. The evidential diagram can then be analyzed using belief functions technique with survey data, thereby extending the research from a discovery and explanation stage to testing and prediction. An example is provided to demonstrate these steps. This chapter also provides the basics of Dempster-Shafer theory of belief functions and a step-by-step description of the propagation process of beliefs in tree like evidential diagrams.

[1]  R. P. Srivastava,et al.  A conceptual framework and belief‐function approach to assessing overall information quality , 2003, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[2]  C. Marlenefiol MAPS FOR MANAGERS: WHERE ARE WE? WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE? , 2007 .

[3]  Thomas M. Strat Continuous Belief Functions for Evidential Reasoning , 1984, AAAI.

[4]  Philippe Smets,et al.  The Transferable Belief Model for Quantified Belief Representation , 1998 .

[5]  C. Eden,et al.  The analysis of cause maps , 1992 .

[6]  Kay M. Nelson,et al.  Understanding Software Operations Support Expertise: A Revealed Causal Mapping Approach , 2000, MIS Q..

[7]  R. P. Srivastava,et al.  The Bayesian and belief-function formalisms a general perspective for auditing , 1990 .

[8]  Rajendra P. Srivastava,et al.  Auditors’ Evaluations of Uncertain Audit Evidence: Belief Functions versus Probabilities , 2002 .

[9]  M. Bougon Cognition in Organizations: An Analysis of the Utrecht Jazz Orchestra. , 1977 .

[10]  Kathleen M. Carley Extracting team mental models through textual analysis , 1997 .

[11]  Jason Bennett Thatcher,et al.  Turnover of Information Technology Workers: Examining Empirically the Influence of Attitudes, Job Characteristics, and External Markets , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Glenn Shafer,et al.  Evidential Reasoning Using DELEF , 1988, AAAI.

[13]  Liam Fahey,et al.  LINKING CHANGES IN REVEALED CAUSAL MAPS AND ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY , 1989 .

[14]  Tim Smithin,et al.  Mapping Strategic Thought , 1991 .

[15]  Philippe Smets,et al.  The Combination of Evidence in the Transferable Belief Model , 1990, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[16]  Rajendra P. Srivastava Belief Functions and Audit Decisions , 2006 .

[17]  Tor Guimaraes,et al.  Attitudes and intentions of information center personnel , 1992, Inf. Manag..

[18]  Lívia Markíczy,et al.  A Method for Eliciting and Comparing Causal Maps , 1995 .

[19]  A. R. Ilersic,et al.  Research methods in social relations , 1961 .

[20]  Andrew P. Sage,et al.  Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[21]  Sarah Rice,et al.  Identifying the enablers and barriers of IT personnel transition , 2004 .

[22]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Research methods in social relations , 1962 .

[23]  Rajendra P. Srivastava,et al.  Evidential reasoning for WebTrust assurance services , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[24]  R. P. Srivastava,et al.  The belief‐function approach to aggregating audit evidence , 1995, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[25]  M. V. Valkenburg Network Analysis , 1964 .

[26]  Hai Lu,et al.  Structural analysis of audit evidence using belief functions , 2002, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[27]  Prakash P. Shenoy,et al.  Axioms for probability and belief-function proagation , 1990, UAI.

[28]  Prakash P. Shenoy,et al.  A Bayesian network approach to making inferences in causal maps , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[29]  John B. Sullivan Discussant's response to "AUDITOR'S ASSISTANT: A knowledge engineering tool for audit decisions"; , 1988 .

[30]  Shawn P. Curley,et al.  Using Belief Functions to Represent Degrees of Belief , 1994 .

[31]  Glenn Shafer,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Evidence , 2020, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence.

[32]  Philippe Smets,et al.  Constructing the Pignistic Probability Function in a Context of Uncertainty , 1989, UAI.

[33]  Rajendra P. Srivastava,et al.  Applications of Belief Functions in Business Decisions: A Review , 2003, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[34]  C. Eden ON THE NATURE OF COGNITIVE MAPS , 1992 .

[35]  Kathleen M. Carley Extracting team mental models through textual analysis , 1997 .

[36]  Tor Guimaraes,et al.  Antecedents and Consequences of Job Satisfaction among Information Center Employees , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[37]  R. P. Srivastava,et al.  Belief functions in business decisions , 2002 .

[38]  Richard,et al.  Motivation through the Design of Work: Test of a Theory. , 1976 .

[39]  Soon Ang,et al.  Work Outcomes and Job Design for Contract Versus Permanent Information Systems Professionals on Software Development Teams , 2001, MIS Q..

[40]  Alessandro Saffiotti,et al.  Pulcinella: A General Tool for Propagating Uncertainty in Valuation Networks , 1991, UAI.

[41]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Bayesian and belief-functions formalisms for evidential reasoning: a conceptual analysis , 1990 .