An experimental study of helically stamped ceramic microfiltration membranes using bentonite suspensions

New geometries of zirconia and titania membranes were shown to enhance permeate flux during tangential filtration. The modified membrane surface acts as an integrated turbulence promoter while the system is free from vibration or any other problem inherent to the addition either of turbulence promoter or a complementary device as for pulsed feed flow or rotating membranes. The aim of this work was to investigate the influence of the helical relief on permeate flux during bentonite suspension filtration and the potential application of these new membranes for an industrial development. As with a classical smooth membrane, cake filtration occurred, but stamped membranes were proved to reduce polarisation concentration, and to increase mass transfer coefficient as well. Variations of the helical relief thread width and thickness, and the effect of helix direction inversions were investigated. As regard with classical smooth membranes, stamped membranes from 125 to 380 mm long and membranes with inner diameters ranging from 5 to 16.65 mm were found to improve permeate flux in a comparable way, and some of the configurations remained competitive from an energetic approach. Moreover, for a given membrane length, commercial multichannel membrane performances were surpassed by stamped membranes since the permeate flux was multiplied by factors up to 2.5 and 4, respectively.

[1]  J. Howell,et al.  The effect of pulsed flow on ultrafiltration fluxes in a baffled tubular membrane system , 1990 .

[2]  E. Fordham,et al.  Cross-flow filtration of bentonite suspensions, II , 1992 .

[3]  M. Mackley,et al.  Cake filtration mechanisms in steady and unsteady flows , 1993 .

[4]  E. Spiazzi,et al.  A new generator of unsteady-state flow regime in tubular membranes as an anti-fouling technique : a hydrodynamic approach , 1993 .

[5]  T. Murase,et al.  Filtrate flux in crossflow microfiltration of dilute suspension forming a highly compressible fouling cake-layer , 1995 .

[6]  C. Fonade,et al.  Flux enhancement in crossflow filtration using an unsteady jet , 1997 .

[7]  Robert W. Field,et al.  A helical baffle for cross-flow microfiltration , 1995 .

[8]  F. Tiller,et al.  Theory of Filtration of Ceramics: I, Slip Casting , 1986 .

[9]  B. Jönsson,et al.  Colloidal fouling during ultrafiltration , 1996 .

[10]  R. Sethumadhavan,et al.  Turbulent Flow Friction and Heat Transfer Characteristics of Single- and Multistart Spirally Enhanced Tubes , 1986 .

[11]  Andrew L. Zydney,et al.  A CONCENTRATION POLARIZATION MODEL FOR THE FILTRATE FLUX IN CROSS-FLOW MICROFILTRATION OF PARTICULATE SUSPENSIONS , 1986 .

[12]  C. S. Vassilieff,et al.  Corss-flow microfiltration of bentonite-in-water dispersions: Initial transient effects at low concentration , 1996 .

[13]  L. Broussous,et al.  Stamped ceramic porous tubes for tangential filtration , 1998 .

[14]  M. Jaffrin,et al.  Permeate flux enhancement by pressure and flow pulsations in microfiltration with mineral membranes , 1992 .

[15]  Robert H. Davis,et al.  The behavior of suspensions and macromolecular solutions in crossflow microfiltration , 1994 .

[16]  K. Kroner,et al.  Improved Dynamic Filtration of Microbial Suspensions , 1987, Bio/Technology.

[17]  T. Murase,et al.  Dynamic microfiltration of dilute slurries with a rotating ceramic membrane , 1991 .

[18]  Georges Belfort,et al.  Enhanced performance for pressure-driven membrane processes: the argument for fluid instabilities , 1993 .

[19]  H. Boisson,et al.  Hydrodynamic aspects of filtration antifouling by helically corrugated membranes , 2000 .

[20]  Marcel Mulder,et al.  Basic Principles of Membrane Technology , 1991 .