A Slotted Decellularized Osteochondral Scaffold With Layer-Specific Release of Stem Cell Differentiation Stimulators Enhances Cartilage and Bone Regeneration in Osteochondral Defects in a Rabbit Model

Background: Owing to the disappointing regenerative ability of osteochondral tissue, without treatment an osteochondral defect would progress to osteoarthritis. This situation motivates the need for new strategies to enhance the regeneration of osteochondral defects. Purpose: To develop a tissue-engineering scaffold by tethering bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP2) and transforming growth factor beta 3 (TGFβ3) in a layer-specific manner on a slotted decellularized osteochondral matrix (SDOM) and to evaluate the efficacy of this scaffold for osteochondral regeneration. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Normal osteochondral tissue from the rabbit patellofemoral groove was sectioned into a slot shape and decellularized for fabricating an SDOM. The collagen-binding domain (CBD) was fused into the N-terminus of BMP2 or TGFβ3 to synthesize 2 recombinant growth factors (GFs) (CBD-BMP2 or CBD-TGFβ3), which were tethered to the bone layer and cartilage layer, respectively, of the SDOM to prepare a tissue-engineering scaffold (namely, CBD-GFs/SDOM). After examining the influence of the CBD-GFs/SDOM on the viability and layer-specific differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in vitro, we determined the regeneration potential of the CBD-GFs/SDOM on osteochondral regeneration in a rabbit model. A total of 72 New Zealand White rabbits with a cylindrical osteochondral defect in the patellofemoral groove were randomly assigned to 3 groups: defect only (control [CTL] group), defect patched with an SDOM (SDOM group), and defect patched with the CBD-GFs/SDOM (CBD-GFs/SDOM group). At 6 or 12 weeks postoperatively, the rabbits were euthanized to harvest the knee joint, which was then evaluated via gross observation, micro–computed tomography, histological staining, and mechanical testing. Results: In vitro, the CBD-GFs/SDOM was noncytotoxic, showed high biomimetics with normal osteochondral tissue, was suitable for cell adhesion and growth, and had good layer-specific ability in inducing stem cell differentiation. Macroscopic images showed that the CBD-GFs/SDOM group had significantly better osteochondral regeneration than the CTL and SDOM groups had. Micro–computed tomography demonstrated that much more bony tissue was formed at the defect sites in the CBD-GFs/SDOM group compared with the defect sites in the CTL or SDOM group. Histological analysis showed that the CBD-GFs/SDOM group had a significant enhancement in osteochondral regeneration at 6 and 12 weeks postoperatively in comparison with the CTL or SDOM group. At 12 weeks postoperatively, the mechanical properties of reparative tissue were significantly better in the CBD-GFs/SDOM group than in the other groups. Conclusion: The CBD-GFs/SDOM is a promising scaffold for osteochondral regeneration. Clinical Relevance: The findings of this study indicated that the CBD-GFs/SDOM is an excellent candidate for reconstructing osteochondral defects, which may be translated for clinical use in the future.

[1]  M. Zare,et al.  Advanced Hydrogels for Cartilage Tissue Engineering: Recent Progress and Future Directions , 2021, Polymers.

[2]  P. Nair,et al.  3D-printed biphasic scaffolds for the simultaneous regeneration of osteochondral tissues , 2021, Biomedical materials.

[3]  Jiacan Su,et al.  Subchondral bone microenvironment in osteoarthritis and pain , 2021, Bone Research.

[4]  Y. She,et al.  A Biomimetic Biphasic Scaffold Consisting of Decellularized Cartilage and Decalcified Bone Matrixes for Osteochondral Defect Repair , 2021, Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology.

[5]  Jianzhong Hu,et al.  Designing a novel vacuum aspiration system to decellularize large-size enthesis with preservation of physicochemical and biological properties , 2020, Annals of translational medicine.

[6]  J. Fisher,et al.  Concurrent multi-lineage differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells through spatial presentation of growth factors , 2020, Biomedical materials.

[7]  Benjamin B. Rothrauff,et al.  Decellularized bone extracellular matrix in skeletal tissue engineering. , 2020, Biochemical Society transactions.

[8]  Jianzhong Hu,et al.  Functional decellularized fibrocartilaginous matrix graft for rotator cuff enthesis regeneration: A novel technique to avoid in-vitro loading of cells. , 2020, Biomaterials.

[9]  Jianzhong Hu,et al.  Sustained release of collagen‐affinity SDF‐1α from book‐shaped acellular fibrocartilage scaffold enhanced bone‐tendon healing in a rabbit model , 2020, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[10]  Huichang Gao,et al.  Molecular recognition-directed site-specific release of stem cell differentiation inducers for enhanced joint repair. , 2019, Biomaterials.

[11]  Wei Xia,et al.  An injectable continuous stratified structurally and functionally biomimetic construct for enhancing osteochondral regeneration. , 2019, Biomaterials.

[12]  Chengtie Wu,et al.  Bioactive scaffolds for osteochondral regeneration , 2018, Journal of orthopaedic translation.

[13]  R. Mauck,et al.  Physiology and Engineering of the Graded Interfaces of Musculoskeletal Junctions. , 2018, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[14]  P. Gentile,et al.  Recent Approaches to the Manufacturing of Biomimetic Multi-Phasic Scaffolds for Osteochondral Regeneration , 2018, International journal of molecular sciences.

[15]  Bing Chen,et al.  Controlled release of collagen-binding SDF-1α from the collagen scaffold promoted tendon regeneration in a rat Achilles tendon defect model. , 2018, Biomaterials.

[16]  Anuradha Subramanian,et al.  Gradient nano-engineered in situ forming composite hydrogel for osteochondral regeneration. , 2018, Biomaterials.

[17]  Yilin Cao,et al.  Repair of articular cartilage defects with acellular cartilage sheets in a swine model , 2017, Biomedical materials.

[18]  M. Alini,et al.  Biomaterials for articular cartilage tissue engineering: Learning from biology. , 2018, Acta biomaterialia.

[19]  C. V. van Blitterswijk,et al.  Covalent Binding of Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 and Transforming Growth Factor-β3 to 3D Plotted Scaffolds for Osteochondral Tissue Regeneration. , 2017, Biotechnology journal.

[20]  G. De Crescenzo,et al.  Design and Use of Chimeric Proteins Containing a Collagen-Binding Domain for Wound Healing and Bone Regeneration. , 2016, Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews.

[21]  M. Shahidi Thrombosis and von Willebrand Factor. , 2016, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[22]  Zhouyuan Yang,et al.  Repair of the calvarial defect in goat model using magnesium-doped porous hydroxyapatite combined with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2. , 2017, Bio-medical materials and engineering.

[23]  F. Cui,et al.  In vitro and in vivo enhancement of osteogenic capacity in a synthetic BMP‐2 derived peptide‐coated mineralized collagen composite , 2016, Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

[24]  Caixia Xu,et al.  Exogenous Heparan Sulfate Enhances the TGF-β3-Induced Chondrogenesis in Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells by Activating TGF-β/Smad Signaling , 2015, Stem cells international.

[25]  Elizabeth R Balmayor,et al.  Strategies to engineer tendon/ligament-to-bone interface: Biomaterials, cells and growth factors. , 2015, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[26]  Abhay Pandit,et al.  Biomimetic approaches in bone tissue engineering: Integrating biological and physicomechanical strategies. , 2015, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[27]  Jerry C. Hu,et al.  Repair and tissue engineering techniques for articular cartilage , 2015, Nature Reviews Rheumatology.

[28]  W. Suchorska,et al.  The role of growth factors in stem cell-directed chondrogenesis: a real hope for damaged cartilage regeneration , 2015, International Orthopaedics.

[29]  X. Sui,et al.  In vivo cartilage repair using adipose‐derived stem cell‐loaded decellularized cartilage ECM scaffolds , 2014, Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

[30]  T. Yen,et al.  Osteogenic differentiation of adipose-derived stem cells and calvarial defect repair using baculovirus-mediated co-expression of BMP-2 and miR-148b. , 2014, Biomaterials.

[31]  H. Yoshikawa,et al.  Osteochondral tissue engineering with biphasic scaffold: current strategies and techniques. , 2014, Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews.

[32]  Henning Madry,et al.  Bioinspired scaffolds for osteochondral regeneration. , 2014, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[33]  D. Seliktar,et al.  Enhanced infarct stabilization and neovascularization mediated by VEGF-loaded PEGylated fibrinogen hydrogel in a rodent myocardial infarction model. , 2013, Biomaterials.

[34]  Jerry C. Hu,et al.  Unlike Bone, Cartilage Regeneration Remains Elusive , 2012, Science.

[35]  Yilin Cao,et al.  Chondrogenic differentiation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells induced by acellular cartilage sheets. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[36]  C. Cunha,et al.  Osteochondral tissue engineering approaches for articular cartilage and subchondral bone regeneration , 2012, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[37]  Junfeng Zhang,et al.  Simultaneous regeneration of articular cartilage and subchondral bone in vivo using MSCs induced by a spatially controlled gene delivery system in bilayered integrated scaffolds. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[38]  Swapnil Mahajan,et al.  Identification of Local Conformational Similarity in Structurally Variable Regions of Homologous Proteins Using Protein Blocks , 2011, PloS one.

[39]  Evan L. Flatow,et al.  BMP-12 Treatment of Adult Mesenchymal Stem Cells In Vitro Augments Tendon-Like Tissue Formation and Defect Repair In Vivo , 2011, PloS one.

[40]  Yilin Cao,et al.  A sandwich model for engineering cartilage with acellular cartilage sheets and chondrocytes. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[41]  Boon Chin Heng,et al.  The effect of incorporation of exogenous stromal cell-derived factor-1 alpha within a knitted silk-collagen sponge scaffold on tendon regeneration. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[42]  Scott A. Rodeo,et al.  The Basic Science of Articular Cartilage , 2009, Sports health.

[43]  K. Athanasiou,et al.  Extraction techniques for the decellularization of tissue engineered articular cartilage constructs. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[44]  J. Mcclure,et al.  The normal human chondro-osseous junctional region: evidence for contact of uncalcified cartilage with subchondral bone and marrow spaces , 2006, BMC musculoskeletal disorders.

[45]  B. Furie,et al.  Glycoprotein VI-dependent and -independent pathways of thrombus formation in vivo. , 2006, Blood.

[46]  Brunella Grigolo,et al.  Transplantation of chondrocytes seeded on collagen-based scaffold in cartilage defects in rabbits. , 2005, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[47]  S P James,et al.  The role of subchondral bone in joint disease: a review. , 2010, Equine veterinary journal.

[48]  J. Mansour,et al.  Repair of large full-thickness articular cartilage defects with allograft articular chondrocytes embedded in a collagen gel. , 1998, Tissue engineering.

[49]  E. Morris,et al.  The Effect of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 (rhBMP-2) on the Healing of Full-Thickness Defects of Articular Cartilage* , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[50]  G W Blunn,et al.  Three-dimensional collagen architecture in bovine articular cartilage. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.