The Epistemic Cultures of Science and Wikipedia: A Comparison

ABSTRACT I compare the epistemic culture of Wikipedia with the epistemic culture of science, with special attention to the culture of collaborative research in science. The two cultures differ markedly with respect to (1) the knowledge produced, (2) who produces the knowledge, and (3) the processes by which knowledge is produced. Wikipedia has created a community of inquirers that are governed by norms very different from those that govern scientists. Those who contribute to Wikipedia do not ground their claims on their reputations as knowers, for they stand to lose nothing if and when their contributions are found to be misleading or false. And the immediacy of the medium encourages gossip and jokes. Hence, though we have some reason to believe that an invisible hand aids scientists in realizing their epistemic goals, we cannot ground our confidence in what is reported on Wikipedia on the fact that an invisible hand ensures quality. Nor is the information on Wikipedia aptly justified in a manner similar to the way testimony can be justified.

[1]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[2]  R. Merton.  The Normative Structure of Science , 1973 .

[3]  Norman Kaplan,et al.  The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations , 1974 .

[4]  R. Nozick.  Anarchy, State, and Utopia , 1975, Princeton Readings in Political Thought.

[5]  B. Latour,et al.  Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts , 1979 .

[6]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[7]  D. Hull,et al.  Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science, David L. Hull. 1988. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. 608 pages. ISBN: 0-226-35060-4. $39.95 , 1989 .

[8]  S. Cole.  Making Science: Between Nature and Society , 1992 .

[9]  Frederick F. Schmitt.  Socializing Epistemology: The Social Dimensions of Knowledge , 1994 .

[10]  J. Sayers.  Against Method , 2016 .

[11]  S. Cole,et al.  : A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England , 1996 .

[12]  T. Kuhn.  The structure of scientific revolutions, 3rd ed. , 1996 .

[13]  Retraction Kiehntopf,et al.  Retraction , 1997, Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp..

[14]  An argument about free inquiry , 1997 .

[15]  P. Thagard,et al.  How Scientists Explain Disease , 1999 .

[16]  Steve Fuller,et al.  The Governance of Science , 1999 .

[17]  K. Knorr-Cetina,et al.  Epistemic cultures : how the sciences make knowledge , 1999 .

[18]  K. B. Wray.  Invisible Hands and the Success of Science , 2000, Philosophy of Science.

[19]  D. Hull.  Science and Selection: Essays on Biological Evolution and the Philosophy of Science , 2000 .

[20]  Science, Biases, and the Threat of Global Pessimism , 2001, Philosophy of Science.

[21]  James Robert Brown,et al.  Who rules in science? : an opinionated guide to the wars , 2001 .

[22]  K. Brad Wray,et al.  The Epistemic Significance of Collaborative Research , 2002, Philosophy of Science.

[23]  M. Biagioli,et al.  Scientific Authorship : Credit and Intellectual Property in Science , 2004 .

[24]  J. Giles.  Internet encyclopaedias go head to head , 2005, Nature.

[25]  R. Roberts,et al.  Cdx2 Gene Expression and Trophectoderm Lineage Specification in Mouse Embryos , 2006, Science.

[26]  Paul Thagard,et al.  How to Collaborate: Procedural Knowledge in the Cooperative Development of Science , 2006 .

[27]  K. Brad Wray,et al.  Scientific authorship in the age of collaborative research , 2006 .

[28]  The Shortage of Science Teachers , 2007, Science.

[29]  Deborah Tollefsen,et al.  Group Testimony , 2007 .

[30]  K. Brad Wray,et al.  Who has Scientific Knowledge? , 2007 .

[31]  Don Fallis,et al.  Toward an epistemology of Wikipedia , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[32]  J. Bennett,et al.  Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding , 2010 .