MR volume estimation of subcortical brain lesions and ventricular cerebrospinal fluid: a simple and accurate stereologic method.

PURPOSE To describe an MR imaging quantification method for estimation of total volumes of both white and gray matter subcortical lesions and ventricular cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in the living human brain, and to determine the method's reliability. METHODS In 12 subjects, total subcortical lesion and ventricular CSF volumes were estimated using systematic sampling. Systematic sampling was performed on equidistant MR sections using a counting grid with systematically ordered intersection points. The grid was randomly positioned on each consecutive MR section. Each grid intersection point hitting the structure of interest represents a fixed known volume dependent on grid intersection point distance and the sum of the section thickness and section gap. RESULTS Total volume estimation of subcortical lesion and ventricular CSF takes 15 and 5 minutes per subject, respectively. Coefficients of error of the individual volume estimates ranged from .01 to .13 and are negligible to the coefficients of the group mean (range, .70 to .89). For subcortical lesion volume, the random intraobserver error yielded .04 and for ventricular CSF .02; the random interobserver error amounted to .11 and .04, respectively; and the systematic interobserver error was .15 and .04, respectively. CONCLUSION The method described here for subcortical lesion and ventricular CSF volume estimation is accurate, reliable, valid, and fast.

[1]  B C Bowen,et al.  MR signal abnormalities in memory disorder and dementia. , 1990, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[2]  R. Østerby,et al.  Optimizing sampling efficiency of stereological studies in biology: or ‘Do more less well!‘ , 1981, Journal of microscopy.

[3]  A. Neuhold,et al.  Down syndrome: MR quantification of brain structures and comparison with normal control subjects. , 1991, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[4]  H. Gundersen Stereology of arbitrary particles * , 1986, Journal of microscopy.

[5]  D. Leys,et al.  Periventricular and white matter magnetic resonance imaging hyperintensities do not differ between Alzheimer's disease and normal aging. , 1990, Archives of neurology.

[6]  R F Spetzler,et al.  Incidental subcortical lesions identified on magnetic resonance imaging in the elderly. I. Correlation with age and cerebrovascular risk factors. , 1986, Stroke.

[7]  Bonaventura Cavalieri,et al.  Geometria degli indivisibili , 1966 .

[8]  P. Scheltens,et al.  A semiquantative rating scale for the assessment of signal hyperintensities on magnetic resonance imaging , 1993, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[9]  A. Alavi,et al.  MR signal abnormalities at 1.5 T in Alzheimer's dementia and normal aging. , 1987, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  J. Trojanowski,et al.  Brain MR: pathologic correlation with gross and histopathology. 1. Lacunar infarction and Virchow-Robin spaces. , 1988, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  Unbiased and efficient estimation of total ventricular volume of the brain obtained from CT-scans by a stereological method , 2004, Neuroradiology.

[12]  H. Hendrie,et al.  Foci of increased T2 signal intensity on brain MR scans of healthy elderly subjects. , 1989, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[13]  H J Gundersen,et al.  The efficiency of systematic sampling in stereology and its prediction * , 1987, Journal of microscopy.

[14]  V. Haughton,et al.  High-signal foci on MR images of the brain: observer variability in their quantification. , 1992, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.