Probabilistic Earthquake Location in 3D and Layered Models

Probabilistic earthquake location with non-linear, global search methods allows the use of 3D models and produces comprehensive uncertainty and resolution information represented by a probability density function over the unknown hypocentral parameters. We describe a probabilistic earthquake location methodology and introduce an efficient Metropolis-Gibbs, non-linear, global sampling algorithm to obtain such locations. Using synthetic travel times generated in a 3D model, we examine the locations and uncertainties given by an exhaustive grid-search and the Metropolis-Gibbs sampler using 3D and layered velocity models, and by a iterative, linear method in the layered model. We also investigate the relation of average station residuals to known static delays in the travel times, and the quality of the recovery of known focal mechanisms. With the 3D model and exact data, the location probability density functions obtained with the Metropolis-Gibbs method are nearly identical to those of the slower but exhaustive grid-search. The location PDFs can be large and irregular outside of a station network even for the case of exact data. With location in the 3D model and static shifts added to the data, there are systematic biases in the event locations. Locations using the layered model show that both linear and global methods give systematic biases in the event locations and that the error volumes do not include the “true” location — absolute event locations and errors are not recovered. The iterative, linear location method can fail for locations near sharp contrasts in velocity and outside of a network. Metropolis-Gibbs is a practical method to obtain complete, probabilistic locations for large numbers of events and for location in 3D models. It is only about 10 times slower than linearized methods but is stable for cases where linearized methods fail. The exhaustive grid-search method is about 1000 times slower than linearized methods but is useful for location of smaller number of events and to obtain accurate images of location probability density functions that may be highly-irregular.

[1]  G. Natale,et al.  The seismicity of Mt. Vesuvius , 1996 .

[2]  A. Tarantola Inverse problem theory : methods for data fitting and model parameter estimation , 1987 .

[3]  N. Metropolis,et al.  Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines , 1953, Resonance.

[4]  Mrinal K. Sen,et al.  Global Optimization Methods in Geophysical Inversion , 1995 .

[5]  R. Wiggins,et al.  Monte Carlo inversion of body‐wave observations , 1969 .

[6]  F. Gomez,et al.  An integrated geophysical investigation of recent seismicity in the Al-Hoceima region of north Morocco , 1997, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[7]  G. Lepage A new algorithm for adaptive multidimensional integration , 1978 .

[8]  G. D. Nelson,et al.  Earthquake locations by 3-D finite-difference travel times , 1990, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[9]  J. Vidale Finite-difference calculation of travel times , 1988 .

[10]  P. Podvin,et al.  Finite difference computation of traveltimes in very contrasted velocity models: a massively parallel approach and its associated tools , 1991 .

[11]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[12]  Frank Press,et al.  Earth models obtained by Monte Carlo inversion. , 1968 .

[13]  V. I. Keilis-Borok,et al.  Inverse Problems of Seismology (Structural Review) , 1967 .

[14]  J. Hammersley,et al.  Monte Carlo Methods , 1964, Computational Statistical Physics.

[15]  A. Tarantola,et al.  Inverse problems = Quest for information , 1982 .

[16]  B. Kennett,et al.  Locating oceanic earthquakes—the influence of regional models and location criteria , 1992 .

[17]  M. Sambridge,et al.  Genetic algorithms in seismic waveform inversion , 1992 .

[18]  G. Wittlinger,et al.  Earthquake location in strongly heterogeneous media , 1993 .

[19]  J. Virieux,et al.  Seismic tomography of the Gulf of Corinth: a comparison of methods , 1997 .

[20]  John J. Grefenstette,et al.  Genetic algorithms and their applications , 1987 .

[21]  Malcolm Sambridge,et al.  A novel method of hypocentre location , 1986 .

[22]  P. Shearer Application to the Whittier Narrows California aftershock sequence , 1997 .

[23]  R. H. Jones,et al.  A method for determining significant structures in a cloud of earthquakes , 1997 .

[24]  Barbara Romanowicz,et al.  Regional and far-regional earthquake locations and source parameters using sparse broadband networks: A test on the Ridgecrest sequence , 1998, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[25]  T. Moser,et al.  Hypocenter determination in strongly heterogeneous Earth models using the shortest path method , 1992 .

[26]  Albert Tarantola,et al.  Monte Carlo sampling of solutions to inverse problems , 1995 .

[27]  M. Cushing,et al.  The South Eastern Durance fault permanent network: Preliminary results , 2000 .

[28]  David Oppenheimer,et al.  FPFIT, FPPLOT and FPPAGE; Fortran computer programs for calculating and displaying earthquake fault-plane solutions , 1985 .

[29]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[30]  Loma Prieta aftershock relocation with S-P travel times: Effects of 3-D structure and true error estimates , 1991, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[31]  J. Scales,et al.  Global optimization methods for multimodal inverse problems , 1992 .

[32]  C. D. Gelatt,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.

[33]  J. Lahr HYPOELLIPSE; a computer program for determining local earthquake hypocentral parameters, magnitude, and first-motion pattern , 1979 .

[34]  R. Snieder,et al.  Identifying sets of acceptable solutions to non-linear, geophysical inverse problems which have complicated misfit functions , 1995 .

[35]  S. Gresta,et al.  Inferences on the main volcano-tectonic structures at Mt. Etna (Sicily) from a probabilistic seismological approach , 1998 .

[36]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[37]  B. Kennett Wavenumber and wavetype coupling in laterally heterogeneous media , 1986 .

[38]  S. Billings Simulated annealing for earthquake location , 1994 .

[39]  Daniel H. Rothman,et al.  Nonlinear inversion, statistical mechanics, and residual statics estimation , 1985 .

[40]  L. N. Frazer,et al.  Vertical seismic profile inversion with genetic algorithms , 1994 .

[41]  Mrinal K. Sen,et al.  Nonlinear multiparameter optimization using genetic algorithms; inversion of plane-wave seismograms , 1991 .

[42]  Malcolm Sambridge,et al.  Earthquake hypocenter location using genetic algorithms , 1993, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[43]  Gary L. Pavlis,et al.  Appraising earthquake hypocenter location errors: A complete, practical approach for single-event locations , 1986 .