Does Removing Stereotype Priming Remove Bias? A Pilot Human-Robot Interaction Study

Robots capable of participating in complex social interactions have shown great potential in a variety of applications. As these robots grow more popular, it is essential to continuously evaluate the dynamics of the human-robot relationship. One factor shown to have potential impacts on this critical relationship is the human projection of stereotypes onto social robots, a practice that is implicitly known to effect both developers and users of this technology. As such, in this research, we wished to investigate the difference in participants' perceptions of the robot interaction if we removed stereotype priming. This has not yet been a common practice in similar studies. Given the stereotypes of emotions among ethnic groups, especially in the U.S., this study specifically sought to investigate the impact that robot "skin color" could potentially have on the human perception of a robot's emotional expressive behavior. A between-subject experiment with 198 individuals was conducted. The results showed no significant differences in the overall emotion classification or intensity ratings for the different robot skin colors. These results lend credence to our hypothesis that when individuals are not primed with information related to human stereotypes, robots are evaluated based on functional attributes versus stereotypical attributes. This provides some confidence that robots, if designed correctly, can potentially be used as a tool to override stereotype-based biases associated with human behavior.

[1]  Nalini Ambady,et al.  “Math is Hard!” The effect of gender priming on women’s attitudes , 2006 .

[2]  Ayanna M. Howard,et al.  Recognition of Gestural Behaviors Expressed by Humanoid Robotic Platforms for Teaching Affect Recognition to Children with Autism - A Healthy Subjects Pilot Study , 2017, ICSR.

[3]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[4]  Sofiane Boucenna,et al.  Evaluating the Engagement with Social Robots , 2015, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[5]  C.D. Martin,et al.  The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television and New Media Like Real People and Places [Book Review] , 1997, IEEE Spectrum.

[6]  Hsi-Peng Lu,et al.  Stereotypes or golden rules? Exploring likable voice traits of social robots as active aging companions for tech-savvy baby boomers in Taiwan , 2018, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[7]  Christoph Bartneck,et al.  Robots And Racism , 2018, 2018 13th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[8]  P. Thagard,et al.  FORMING IMPRESSIONS FROM STEREOTYPES, TRAITS, AND BEHAVIORS : A PARALLEL-CONSTRAINT-SATISFACTION THEORY , 1996 .

[9]  Myounghoon Jeon,et al.  Robot-Assisted Socio-Emotional Intervention Framework for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder , 2018, HRI.

[10]  Jenay M. Beer,et al.  Rural Minority Students’ Perceptions of Ms. An, The Robot Teaching Assistant, as a Social Teaching Tool , 2015 .

[11]  G. Haddock,et al.  Look Black in Anger: The role of implicit prejudice in the categorization and perceived emotional intensity of racially ambiguous faces , 2008 .

[12]  J. Cunningham,et al.  She Looks Sad, But He Looks Mad: The Effects of Age, Gender, and Ambiguity on Emotion Perception , 2014, The Journal of social psychology.

[13]  U. Hess,et al.  The Influence of Facial Emotion Displays, Gender, and Ethnicity on Judgments of Dominance and Affiliation , 2000 .

[14]  Carolyn E. Gibson,et al.  A Replication Attempt of Stereotype Susceptibility (Shih, Pittinsky, & Ambady, 1999) , 2014 .

[15]  Elisabeth André,et al.  Creation and Evaluation of emotion expression with body movement, sound and eye color for humanoid robots , 2011, 2011 RO-MAN.