Research on Personalized Learning Pattern in Traditional Handicraft Using Augmented Reality: A Case Study of Cantonese Porcelain

Recently, technology-enhanced learning research has increasingly focused on emergent technologies such as augmented reality. Educational researchers of traditional handicraft have used emergent technologies to inject affective and cognitive learning in teaching. However, numerous studies have highlighted content display of traditional handicraft in teaching based on emergent technologies. As far as we know very little work emphasized personalized learning and experience based on augmented reality in traditional handicraft. In order to address these problems, the researchers present an AR-based experiential learning method for traditional handicraft, with the purpose of shifting the pattern of learning from content-centered to experience-centered. Our approach is Augmented Reality-based Personalized Learning Pattern (ARPLP) for traditional handicraft, and it can be divided into four phases. In addition, a case of Cantonese Porcelain is presented to support this pattern in experience interface of application. The results of research produced an experience interface framework of traditional handicraft based on ARPLP, it contributes to the value of augmented reality as well as experiential learning of students for Cantonese Porcelain.

[1]  Virpi Roto,et al.  Understanding, scoping and defining user experience: a survey approach , 2009, CHI.

[2]  Wei San-qiang,et al.  Application of AR Technology in Intangible Cultural Heritage and Cultural Tourism Industry , 2016 .

[3]  Woontack Woo,et al.  Metadata schema for context-aware augmented reality applications in cultural heritage domain , 2015, 2015 Digital Heritage.

[4]  Yuichi Iwadate,et al.  Method of 3D reconstruction using graph cuts, and its application to preserving intangible cultural heritage , 2009, 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops, ICCV Workshops.

[5]  Yao-Ting Sung,et al.  Development and behavioral pattern analysis of a mobile guide system with augmented reality for painting appreciation instruction in an art museum , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[6]  Fernando Torres Medina,et al.  Hands-on experiences of undergraduate students in Automatics and Robotics using a virtual and remote laboratory , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[7]  Joanna C. Dunlap,et al.  Preparing e-Learning Designers Using Kolb's Model of Experiential Learning. , 2008 .

[8]  Fattaneh Taghiyareh,et al.  Personalization of gamification-elements in an e-learning environment based on learners' motivation , 2016, 2016 8th International Symposium on Telecommunications (IST).

[9]  Timothy Jung,et al.  Value of Augmented Reality at Cultural Heritage Sites: A Stakeholder Approach , 2017 .

[10]  Yongtian Wang,et al.  Teaching based on augmented reality for a technical creative design course , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[11]  Carlos Delgado Kloos,et al.  Impact of an augmented reality system on students' motivation for a visual art course , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[12]  Manuel Contero,et al.  Experiencing Augmented Reality as an Accessibility Resource in the UNESCO Heritage Site Called "La Lonja", Valencia , 2013, VARE.

[13]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  What Is Personalization? Perspectives on the Design and Implementation of Personalization in Information Systems , 2006, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[14]  John Russon.  Sites of Exposure: Art, Politics, and the Nature of Experience , 2017 .

[15]  Betty Mayeku,et al.  ENHANCING PERSONALIZATION AND LEARNER ENGAGEMENT IN CONTEXT-AWARE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT , 2015 .

[16]  Karan Shah,et al.  An approach towards data visualization based on AR principles , 2017, 2017 International Conference on Big Data Analytics and Computational Intelligence (ICBDAC).

[17]  Denise Whitelock,et al.  Parents reading with their toddlers: The role of personalization in book engagement , 2013 .

[18]  Silvia Baldiris,et al.  Framework to Heritage Education Using Emerging Technologies , 2015 .

[19]  Yanxiang Zhang,et al.  Interactive Spatial AR for Classroom Teaching , 2016, AVR.

[20]  Jorge Bacca,et al.  Augmented Reality Trends in Education: A Systematic Review of Research and Applications , 2014, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[21]  Pattie Maes,et al.  Smarter objects: using AR technology to program physical objects and their interactions , 2013, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[22]  Chia-Chen Chen,et al.  Animating eco-education: To see, feel, and discover in an augmented reality-based experiential learning environment , 2016, Comput. Educ..

[23]  Hiroaki Ogata,et al.  Personalization in Context-aware Ubiquitous Learning-Log System , 2012, 2012 IEEE Seventh International Conference on Wireless, Mobile and Ubiquitous Technology in Education.

[24]  John A. Campbell,et al.  Communicative Practices in Online Communication: A Case of Agreeing to Disagree , 2006, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[25]  Betty Mayeku,et al.  Enhancing personalization and learner engagement through context-aware recommendation in TEL , 2014, RecSys '14.

[26]  H. Fry,et al.  A Handbook for Teaching & Learning in Higher Education: Enhancing Academic Practice. Second Edition. , 2003 .

[27]  Antonio Mongelli,et al.  Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality, and Computer Graphics , 2016, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[28]  Kwiseok Kwon,et al.  How to design personalization in a context of customer retention: Who personalizes what and to what extent? , 2012, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[29]  Anna Åkerfeldt,et al.  Exploring educational video game design: meaning potentials and implications for learning , 2011 .

[30]  Simon Elias Bibri,et al.  ICT of the new wave of computing for sustainable urban forms: Their big data and context-aware augmented typologies and design concepts , 2017 .

[31]  Charles Møller,et al.  A collaborative learning environment for management education based on experiential learning , 2011 .