Differential Effects of Right Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation on Outgroup Attitudes and Their Mediation by Threat From and Competitiveness to Outgroups

A dual-process model of individual differences in prejudice proneness proposes that Right Wing Authoritarianism (RWA) and Social Dominance Orientation (SDO) will influence prejudice against particular outgroups through different motivational mechanisms. RWA should cause negative attitudes toward groups seen as threatening social control, order, cohesion, and stability, such as deviant groups, and negativity toward these groups should be mediated through perceived threat from them. SDO should cause negative attitudes toward groups that activate competitiveness over relative dominance and superiority, such as socially subordinate groups low in power and status, and negativity toward these groups should be mediated through competitiveness toward them. Findings from four student samples that assessed attitudes toward seven social groups selected as likely to vary systematically in social threat and social subordination supported these predictions. The findings have implications for reconciling intergroup and individual difference explanations of prejudice and for interventions to reduce prejudice.

[1]  N. Branscombe,et al.  Attitudes toward group-based inequality: social dominance or social identity? , 2003, The British journal of social psychology.

[2]  Nicolas Michinov,et al.  Does social dominance generate prejudice? Integrating individual and contextual determinants of intergroup cognitions. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  J. Duckitt,et al.  The Impact of Social Threat on Worldview and Ideological Attitudes , 2003 .

[4]  Claire Wagner,et al.  The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: testing a dual process model. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  Amy J. C. Cuddy,et al.  A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  B. Duriez,et al.  The march of modern fascism. A comparison of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism , 2002 .

[7]  T. Little,et al.  To Parcel or Not to Parcel: Exploring the Question, Weighing the Merits , 2002 .

[8]  P. Heaven,et al.  A note on the value correlates of social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism , 2001 .

[9]  K. Charlton,et al.  Status differences and in-group bias: a meta-analytic examination of the effects of status stability, status legitimacy, and group permeability. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  Rupert Brown Social identity theory: past achievements, current problems and future challenges , 2000 .

[11]  V. Esses,et al.  Effects of Perceived Economic Competition on People’s Willingness to Help Empower Immigrants , 2000 .

[12]  David E. Booth,et al.  Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data , 2000, Technometrics.

[13]  G Saucier,et al.  Isms and the structure of social attitudes. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  Stephen H. Wagner,et al.  Threat, Authoritarianism, and Voting: An Investigation of Personality and Persuasion , 1999 .

[15]  Joseph Schwarzwald,et al.  Prejudice toward Immigrants to Spain and Israel , 1998 .

[16]  Thomas H. Lewis,et al.  The Authoritarian Specter , 1997 .

[17]  B. Malle,et al.  Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. , 1994 .

[18]  J. S. Long,et al.  Testing Structural Equation Models , 1993 .

[19]  P. Lachenbruch Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[20]  B. Altemeyer,et al.  Enemies of Freedom: Understanding Right-Wing Authoritarianism , 1988 .

[21]  D. Ward Right-Wing Authoritarianism , 1982, American Political Science Review.

[22]  S. M. Sales Threat as a factor in authoritarianism: an analysis of archival data. , 1973, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  J Tudor-Hart,et al.  On the nature of prejudice. , 1961, The Eugenics review.

[24]  T. Adorno The Authoritarian Personality , 1950 .

[25]  J. Duckitt,et al.  A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice , 2001 .

[26]  J. Dovidio,et al.  The Immigration Dilemma: The Role of Perceived Group Competition, Ethnic Prejudice, and National Identity , 2001 .

[27]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[28]  Amy J. C. Cuddy,et al.  (Dis)respecting versus (Dis)liking: Status and Interdependence Predict Ambivalent Stereotypes of Competence and Warmth , 1999 .

[29]  F. Pratto,et al.  Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression , 1999 .

[30]  V. Esses,et al.  Intergroup Competition and Attitudes Toward Immigrants and Immigration: An Instrumental Model of Group Conflict , 1998 .

[31]  B. Altemeyer,et al.  The Other “Authoritarian Personality” , 1998 .

[32]  Mark P. Zanna,et al.  Values, stereotypes, and emotions as determinants of intergroup attitudes. , 1993 .

[33]  Felicia Pratto,et al.  The inevitability of oppression and the dynamics of social dominance. , 1993 .

[34]  Tom Pyszczynski,et al.  A Terror Management Theory of Social Behavior: The Psychological Functions of Self-Esteem and Cultural Worldviews , 1991 .

[35]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[36]  M. Theunissen The other , 1984 .

[37]  H. Tajfel Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations , 1982 .

[38]  H. Tajfel,et al.  An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. , 1979 .