Frequency of uterine contractions and the risk of spontaneous preterm delivery.

BACKGROUND The measurement of the frequency of uterine contractions has not been useful for reducing the rate of preterm delivery in randomized trials. Nonetheless, ambulatory monitoring of contractions continues to be used in clinical practice. METHODS We assessed the frequency of uterine contractions as a predictor of the risk of spontaneous preterm delivery before 35 weeks of gestation. We enrolled women with singleton pregnancies between 22 and 24 weeks of gestation. The women used a contraction monitor at home to record contraction frequency twice daily on 2 or more days per week from enrollment to delivery or 37 weeks of gestation. RESULTS We obtained 34,908 hours of successful monitoring recordings from 306 women. Although more contractions were recorded from women who delivered before 35 weeks than from women who delivered at 35 weeks or later, we could identify no threshold frequency that effectively identified women who delivered preterm infants. The sensitivity and positive predictive value of a maximal hourly frequency of contractions of four or more between 4 p.m. and 3:59 a.m. were 9 percent and 25 percent, respectively, at 22 to 24 weeks and 28 percent and 23 percent at 27 to 28 weeks. Other proposed screening tests, such as digital and ultrasound evaluations of the cervix and assays for fetal fibronectin in cervicovaginal secretions, also had low sensitivity and positive predictive value for preterm labor. CONCLUSIONS Although the likelihood of preterm delivery increases with an increased frequency of uterine contractions, measurement of this frequency is not clinically useful for predicting preterm delivery.

[1]  E. DeLong,et al.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. , 1988, Biometrics.

[2]  R. Newman,et al.  Detection of Preterm Labor by Ambulatory Monitoring of Uterine Activity: A Preliminary Report , 1986, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[3]  B. Sachs,et al.  Does It Prevent Prematurity , 1991 .

[4]  M. Nageotte,et al.  Quantitation of uterine activity preceding preterm, term, and postterm labor. , 1988, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[5]  K. Schulz,et al.  Randomized controlled trials of home uterine activity monitoring: a review and critique. , 1992, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[6]  A. Kaider,et al.  Cervical length and dilatation of the internal cervical os detected by vaginal ultrasonography as markers for preterm delivery: A systematic review. , 1999, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  B. Mercer,et al.  The Preterm Prediction Study: Fetal Fibronectin Testing and Spontaneous Preterm Birth , 1996, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[8]  S F Bottoms,et al.  The preterm prediction study: the value of new vs standard risk factors in predicting early and all spontaneous preterm births. NICHD MFMU Network. , 1998, American journal of public health.

[9]  A. Kaider,et al.  Cervicovaginal fetal fibronectin as a marker for preterm delivery: a meta-analysis. , 1999, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  J. Grisso,et al.  Extended longitudinal study of uterine activity among low-risk women. , 1991, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[11]  R. Newman,et al.  Assessment of uterine activity in ambulatory patients at high risk of preterm labor and delivery. , 1986, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[12]  K D Burau,et al.  Diurnal and Gestational Patterns of Uterine Activity in Normal Human Pregnancy , 1994, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[13]  Armstrong Ma,et al.  Monitoring women at risk for preterm labor , 1998 .

[14]  A. Germain,et al.  Relationship of circadian rhythms of uterine activity with term and preterm delivery. , 1993, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[15]  E. Thom,et al.  The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.