Hydrological studies on blanket peat: the significance of the acrotelm‐catotelm model

1 Runoff production in blanket peat catchments of the northern Pennine hills, UK was measured through monitoring and experimentation at the plot, hillslope and catchment scale. Water flow from soil pipes was measured in one of the study catchments and overland flow, throughflow and water table were measured in runoff plots; rainfall simulation and tension‐infiltrometry provided information on infiltration characteristics of the peat. 2 Saturation‐excess overland flow was found to dominate the flashy flow regime; acrotelm stormflow, subsurface pipeflow and macropore flow were also found to be important components of the ecohydrological system. 3 Surface cover, topography and preferential flowpaths were found to be important factors in controlling infiltration and runoff production. 4 Streamflow generation processes that are consistent with the acrotelm‐catotelm model are shown to occur in blanket peat with and without Sphagnum cover, but in one of the catchments studied an estimated 10% of the discharge bypassed this route and discharged via pipes. 5 The spatial and temporal variation in hillslope‐scale runoff production was demonstrated in the study catchments. This variability in runoff production will be important for hydroecological understanding in peatlands but is often neglected because of over‐simplification of processes provided by the traditional two‐dimensional acrotelm‐catotelm model.

[1]  G. Manley.  Meteorological observations on Dun Fell, a mountain station in Northern England , 1942 .

[2]  H. Godwin,et al.  Mountains and Moorlands. , 1951 .

[3]  M. Rawes,et al.  A Pennine Peat Slide , 1964 .

[4]  R. Betson,et al.  What is watershed runoff , 1964 .

[5]  D. Boelter.  Water storage characteristics of several peats in situ , 1964 .

[6]  R. West,et al.  The geology of Moor House , 1964 .

[7]  M. Rawes,et al.  FURTHER STUDIES ON SHEEP GRAZING IN THE NORTHERN PENNINES , 1966 .

[8]  H. Ingram,et al.  Problems of Hydrology and Plant Distribution in Mires , 1967 .

[9]  A. Correspondent.  Peat: Erosion in the Pennines , 1972, Nature.

[10]  H. Ingram,et al.  The Transmission of Water Through Peat: II. Field Experiments , 1975 .

[11]  H. Ingram,et al.  Transmission of Water Through Peat , 1975 .

[12]  H. Ingram.  SOIL LAYERS IN MIRES: FUNCTION AND TERMINOLOGY , 1978 .

[13]  R. A. Smith,et al.  Introduction and Site Description , 1978 .

[14]  R. E. Phillips,et al.  Consequences of Water Movement in Macropores 1 , 1979 .

[15]  R. Tomlinson.  Water levels in peatlands and some implications for runoff and erosional processes , 1979 .

[16]  M. Newson,et al.  Soil pipes and pipeflow: A hydrological study in upland Wales , 1980 .

[17]  R. S. Clymo,et al.  Water Movement of Mirelands. , 1981 .

[18]  H. Ingram,et al.  Size and shape in raised mire ecosystems: a geophysical model , 1982, Nature.

[19]  K. Beven,et al.  Macropores and water flow in soils , 1982 .

[20]  M. Mccaig.  Contributions to storm quickflow in a small headwater catchment—the role of natural pipes and soil macropores , 1983 .

[21]  E. S. Verry.  Microtropography and water table fluctuation in a sphagnum mire , 1984 .

[22]  B. Moss,et al.  Mires : swamp, bog, fen, and moor , 1984 .

[23]  G. G. Parker,et al.  The Nature of Soil Piping—A Review of Research , 1985 .

[24]  A practical exercise to demonstrate the variable source area model , 1988 .

[25]  Mark D. Ankeny,et al.  Design for an Automated Tension Infiltrometer , 1988 .

[26]  T. Burt,et al.  Rainfall simulators for investigating soil response to rainfall , 1989 .

[27]  J. Labadz,et al.  Runoff production in peat-covered catchments , 1990 .

[28]  A. Jenkins,et al.  Analysis of runoff pathways and flow contributions using deuterium and stream chemistry , 1991 .

[29]  D. Elrick,et al.  Determination of Hydraulic Conductivity Using a Tension Infiltrometer , 1991 .

[30]  M. Thomas.  British plant communities. Volume 2. Mires and heaths: Edited by J. S. Rodwell. Pp. 628. Cambridge University Press. 1991. £95.00. US $195.00 ISBN 0 521 39165 2 , 1992 .

[31]  J. Price.  Blanket bog in Newfoundland. Part 2. Hydrological processes , 1992 .

[32]  Nick A. Chappell,et al.  Flow path dimensionality and hydrological modelling. , 1992 .

[33]  A. Heathwaite,et al.  Physical processes and properties of mires. , 1993 .

[34]  Kevin Gilman,et al.  Hydrology and Wetland Conservation , 1994 .

[35]  J. Hughes,et al.  Hydrological investigations of soil water and groundwater processes in wetlands. , 1995 .

[36]  D. G. George,et al.  The United Kingdom Environmental Change Network: Protocols for standard measurements at terrestrial sites , 1996 .

[37]  P. Loveland.  Hydrology and hydrochemistry of British wetlands , 1996 .

[38]  T. Marsh,et al.  The 1995 drought - a water resources perspective , 1996 .

[39]  M. Hulme.  The climate in the UK from November 1994 to October 1995 , 1997 .

[40]  Ahmed Khan,et al.  Design and calibration of tipping bucket system for field runoff and sediment quantification , 1997 .

[41]  J. A. Jones,et al.  Factors controlling the distribution of piping in Britain: a reconnaissance , 1997 .

[42]  M. Newson.  Hydrology and hydrochemistry of British wetlands , 1997 .

[43]  A. Baird.  FIELD ESTIMATION OF MACROPORE FUNCTIONING AND SURFACE HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY IN A FEN PEAT , 1997 .

[44]  T. Burt,et al.  Long-term rainfall and streamflow records for north central England: putting the Environmental Change Network site at Moor House, Upper Teesdale, in context , 1998 .

[45]  J. Rodwell,et al.  British Plant Communities, Volume 2: Mires and Heaths , 1998 .

[46]  N. Kouwen,et al.  Modeling the rainfall‐runoff response of a headwater wetland , 1999 .

[47]  J. Holden,et al.  Runoff generation and water table fluctuations in blanket peat: evidence from UK data spanning the dry summer of 1995 , 1999 .

[48]  A. Baird,et al.  Solute movement in drained fen peat: a field tracer study in a Somerset (UK) wetland , 2000 .

[49]  Tomomi Terajima,et al.  Morphology, structure and flow phases in soil pipes developing in forested hillslopes underlain by a Quaternary sand–gravel formation, Hokkaido, northern main island in Japan , 2000 .

[50]  Tim R. Moore,et al.  Modelling and analysis of peatlands as dynamical systems , 2000 .

[51]  J. Tallis.  Bog bursts. , 2001, Biologist.

[52]  O. Bragg,et al.  The sensitivity of peat-covered upland landscapes , 2001 .

[53]  N. Cox,et al.  Macroporosity and infiltration in blanket peat: the implications of tension disc infiltrometer measurements , 2001 .

[54]  T. Burt,et al.  Infiltration, runoff and sediment production in blanket peat catchments: implications of field rainfall simulation experiments , 2002 .

[55]  Joseph Holden,et al.  Application of ground‐penetrating radar to the identification of subsurface piping in blanket peat , 2002 .

[56]  Joseph Holden,et al.  Laboratory experiments on drought and runoff in blanket peat , 2002 .

[57]  Joseph Holden,et al.  Piping and pipeflow in a deep peat catchment , 2002 .

[58]  J. Holden,et al.  Runoff production in blanket peat covered catchments , 2003 .

[59]  T. Burt,et al.  Hydraulic conductivity in upland blanket peat: measurement and variability , 2003 .

[60]  M. Rawes,et al.  The vegetation of the moor house national nature reserve in the northern Pennines, England , 1968, Vegetatio.

[61]  J. Holden.  Soil Pipes and Pipe Flow , 2005 .