The polynomial-time bounded counterparts of Turing (T) and many-one (m) reducibility introduced by Cook and Karp, respectively, provide a useful tool for classifying solvable but intractable problems according to their relative complexity. These concepts proved to be of particular value for classifying problems in NP. Ladner [5] started the study of the polynomial-time (p-) degrees induced by these reducibilities. For instance, he showed that the partial orderings R p and R p of the p-degrees (w.r.t. p-mand p-T-reducibility, respectively) of recursive sets form dense upper semilattices (usl) but not lattices. Moreover, assuming P :~ NP, the classes NPm p and NPx p of p-degrees of NP-sets form infinite dense usl's too. Ladner obtained his results on the degrees of NP-sets by global arguments: To show that NPm p or NP p has a certain property Q, he showed that, for any recursive set A ~ P, property Q applies to the degree classes
[1]
Richard J. Lipton,et al.
On the Structure of Sets in NP and Other Complexity Classes
,
1981,
Theor. Comput. Sci..
[2]
Nancy A. Lynch,et al.
Comparison of polynomial-time reducibilities
,
1974,
STOC '74.
[3]
Richard E. Ladner,et al.
On the Structure of Polynomial Time Reducibility
,
1975,
JACM.
[4]
PAUL CHEW,et al.
A Note on Structure and Looking Back Applied to the Complexity of Computable Functions
,
1981,
J. Comput. Syst. Sci..
[5]
Klaus Ambos-Spies.
An Inhomogeneity in the Structure of Karp Degrees
,
1986,
SIAM J. Comput..
[6]
R.E. Ladner,et al.
A Comparison of Polynomial Time Reducibilities
,
1975,
Theor. Comput. Sci..
[7]
Klaus Ambos-Spies.
On the Structure of Polynomial Time Degrees
,
1984,
STACS.