“The team is more than the sum of its parts”: Implementation of charters to improve team dynamics in an anatomy course

In the current healthcare environment, team-based models in the teaching and practice of medicine have become more a norm than a preference. Renewed focus on team-based practice discloses the effect that poorly functioning teams may have on successful outcomes in team-based delivery of patient care. Team incompetence compromises learning and work performance for all members; an outcome often rooted in poor communication and understanding of role responsibilities within the team. Business schools have been innovative and proactive in recognizing this problem and have instituted team charters to align team expectations and norms through discussion and consensus. Team charters were introduced in Block 2 Microscopic Anatomy and Block 3 Human Structure courses at Mayo Medical School in the first year curriculum. Teams were oriented on the concept of the team-charter and given the opportunity to create individual team charters to suit each team’s work ethos. Teams were encouraged to revisit their charters midway through the course to maintain a dynamic contract. Students took time to reflect on and adapt their strategy in order to facilitate better team cohesiveness, communication, interaction and ultimate performance. Qualitative student feedback indicated that the exercise fostered better group dynamic and improved communication within the team. Students were empowered to take responsibility for their own learning, professional identity formation, performance, academic development and their impact on total performance of the team.

[1]  W. Pawlina,et al.  Developing medical students as teachers: An anatomy‐based student‐as‐teacher program with emphasis on core teaching competencies , 2013, Anatomical sciences education.

[2]  W. Pawlina,et al.  Peer and Faculty Assessment of Nontraditional Discipline-Independent Skills in Gross Anatomy , 2020, Teaching Anatomy.

[3]  R. Fox,et al.  More to teamwork than knowledge, skill and attitude , 2010, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[4]  W. Pawlina,et al.  Evaluating dissection in the gross anatomy course: Correlation between quality of laboratory dissection and students outcomes , 2015, Anatomical sciences education.

[5]  Cynthia M. Pavett,et al.  Increasing Student-Learning Team Effectiveness With Team Charters , 2011 .

[6]  W. Pawlina,et al.  Anatomy teaching assistants: Facilitating teaching skills for medical students through apprenticeship and mentoring , 2013, Medical teacher.

[7]  Win May,et al.  Shaping professionalism in pre-clinical medical students: Professionalism and the practice of medicine , 2009, Medical teacher.

[8]  H Spitz,et al.  Psychiatric training of graduate nursing students. Use of small interactional groups. , 1973, New York state journal of medicine.

[9]  William C. McDowell,et al.  The Effects of a Team Charter on Student Team Behaviors , 2014 .

[10]  Nirusha Lachman,et al.  Assessing the integration of audience response system technology in teaching of anatomical sciences , 2009, Anatomical sciences education.

[11]  Tammy L. Rapp,et al.  Laying the foundation for successful team performance trajectories: The roles of team charters and performance strategies. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[12]  K. Sutcliffe,et al.  Communication Failures: An Insidious Contributor to Medical Mishaps , 2004, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[13]  C. F. Bond,et al.  Social facilitation: a meta-analysis of 241 studies. , 1983, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  V. Fuchs,et al.  Restructuring medical education to meet current and future health care needs. , 2013, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[15]  K. Race,et al.  Can Professionalism Be Measured? The Development of a Scale for Use in the Medical Environment , 1998, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[16]  P. Derstine Implementing goals for non-cognitive outcomes within a basic science course. , 2002, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[17]  W. Pawlina Professionalism and anatomy: How do these two terms define our role? , 2006, Clinical anatomy.

[18]  P. Bobrowski,et al.  The Team Charter Assignment: Improving The Effectiveness of Classroom Teams , 2016 .

[19]  J. Hanson,et al.  An Intentional Modeling Process to Teach Professional Behavior: Students' Clinical Observations of Preceptors , 2004, Teaching and learning in medicine.

[20]  J. Collins,et al.  Audience response systems: technology to engage learners. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[21]  K. Williams,et al.  Many Hands Make Light the Work: The Causes and Consequences of Social Loafing , 1979 .

[22]  R. F. Maudsley Role models and the learning environment: essential elements in effective medical education. , 2001, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[23]  R. Liden,et al.  Social Loafing: A Field Investigation , 2004 .

[24]  R. Lacoursiere A group method to facilitate learning during the stages of a psychiatric affiliation. , 1974, International journal of group psychotherapy.

[25]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Work Groups and Teams in Organizations: Review Update , 2013 .

[26]  W. Pawlina,et al.  Multimodal education in anatomy: The perfect opportunity , 2014, Anatomical sciences education.

[27]  Justin E. Juskewitch,et al.  Comparative efficacy of group and individual feedback in gross anatomy for promoting medical student professionalism , 2010, Anatomical sciences education.

[28]  S. Durning,et al.  Student teaching: views of student near-peer teachers and learners , 2007, Medical teacher.

[29]  L. Dee Fink,et al.  Designing Effective Group Activities: Lessons for Classroom Teaching and Faculty Development , 1997 .

[30]  B. Escobar-Poni,et al.  The role of gross anatomy in promoting professionalism: A neglected opportunity! , 2006, Clinical anatomy.

[31]  W. Pawlina,et al.  The Role of the Anatomist in Teaching of Nontraditional Discipline-Independent Skills , 2020, Teaching Anatomy.

[32]  B. Tuckman DEVELOPMENTAL SEQUENCE IN SMALL GROUPS. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[33]  E. Westbroek,et al.  A new leadership curriculum: the multiplication of intelligence. , 2014, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[34]  A. Pentland The new science of building great teams , 2012 .

[35]  Patricia Solomon, Jean Crowe,et al.  Perceptions of student peer tutors in a problem-based learning programme , 2001, Medical teacher.

[36]  N. Vasan,et al.  Modified use of team‐based learning for effective delivery of medical gross anatomy and embryology , 2008, Anatomical sciences education.

[37]  Darrell J. R. Evans Designing patient‐focused information: An opportunity for communicating anatomically related information , 2008, Anatomical sciences education.

[38]  B. Tuckman,et al.  Stages of Small-Group Development Revisited , 1977 .

[39]  F. Hafferty Beyond curriculum reform: confronting medicine's hidden curriculum , 1998, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[40]  Wojciech Pawlina,et al.  Teaching Anatomy: A Practical Guide , 2015 .

[41]  Darrell J. R. Evans,et al.  Near‐peer teaching in anatomy: An approach for deeper learning , 2009, Anatomical sciences education.