Positron Emission Tomography in Breast Cancer

Gradually, FDG-PET/CT has been strengthening within the diagnostic algorithms of oncological diseases. In many of these, PET/CT has shown to be useful at different stages of the disease: diagnosis, staging or re-staging, treatment response assessment, and recurrence. Some of the advantages of this imaging modality versus CT, MRI, bone scan, mammography, or ultrasound, are based on its great diagnostic capacity since, according to the radiopharmaceutical used, it reflects metabolic changes that often occur before morphological changes and therefore allows us to stage at diagnosis. Moreover, another advantage of this technique is that it allows us to evaluate the whole body so it can be very useful for the detection of distant disease. With regard to breast cancer, FDG-PET/CT has proven to be important when recurrence is suspected or in the evaluation of treatment response. The technological advancement of PET equipment through the development of new detectors and equipment designed specifically for breast imaging, and the development of more specific radiopharmaceuticals for the study of the different biological processes of breast cancer, will allow progress not only in making the diagnosis of the disease at an early stage but also in enabling personalized therapy for patients with breast cancer.

[1]  Rachel F Brem,et al.  Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ with mammography, breast specific gamma imaging, and magnetic resonance imaging: a comparative study. , 2007, Academic radiology.

[2]  A. Iagaru,et al.  Breast MRI and 18F FDG PET/CT in the management of breast cancer. , 2007, Annals of nuclear medicine.

[3]  R. A. Valdés Olmos,et al.  Molecular Imaging in Breast Cancer: From Whole-Body PET/CT to Dedicated Breast PET , 2012, Journal of oncology.

[4]  A. Elster,et al.  Recommendations on the Use of 18F-FDG PET in Oncology , 2009 .

[5]  Michael Bader,et al.  Early prediction of response to chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer using sequential 18F-FDG PET. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[6]  E. Shiba,et al.  Relationship between intrinsic subtypes and tumor responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer. , 2012, Breast disease.

[7]  A. Alavi,et al.  FDG PET positive lymph nodes are highly predictive of metastasis in breast cancer , 2006, Nuclear medicine communications.

[8]  M. Halaç,et al.  Correlation of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake with histopathological prognostic factors in breast carcinoma , 2013, Nuclear medicine communications.

[9]  R. Herfkens,et al.  Pilot Prospective Evaluation of 99mTc-MDP Scintigraphy, 18F NaF PET/CT, 18F FDG PET/CT and Whole-Body MRI for Detection of Skeletal Metastases , 2013, Clinical nuclear medicine.

[10]  H. Saji In Vivo Molecular Imaging. , 2017, Biological & pharmaceutical bulletin.

[11]  Lalit Kumar,et al.  The role of 18F-fluoride PET-CT in the detection of bone metastases in patients with breast, lung and prostate carcinoma: a comparison with FDG PET/CT and 99mTc-MDP bone scan , 2013, Japanese Journal of Radiology.

[12]  J. Vercher-Conejero,et al.  Recurrent and metastatic breast cancer PET, PET/CT, PET/MRI: FDG and new biomarkers. , 2013, The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR), [and] Section of the Society of....

[13]  M. Mayerhoefer,et al.  Integrated contrast-enhanced diagnostic whole-body PET/CT as a first-line restaging modality in patients with suspected metastatic recurrence of breast cancer. , 2010, European journal of radiology.

[14]  Masatoshi Ishibashi,et al.  Improved detection of breast cancer on FDG-PET cancer screening using breast positioning device , 2008, Annals of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  A. Hogg,et al.  Powerful prognostic stratification by [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with high-dose chemotherapy. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  David A Mankoff,et al.  FDG PET, PET/CT, and breast cancer imaging. , 2007, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[17]  Robert N Hoover,et al.  Breast cancer epidemiology according to recognized breast cancer risk factors in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial Cohort , 2009, BMC Cancer.

[18]  Deepa Narayanan,et al.  PET‐Guided Breast Biopsy , 2011, The breast journal.

[19]  R. Kimmig,et al.  Comparison of the Diagnostic Value of FDG-PET/CT and Axillary Ultrasound for the Detection of Lymph Node Metastases in Breast Cancer Patients , 2012, Acta radiologica.

[20]  S. Fox,et al.  Phosphorylated ERalpha, HIF-1alpha, and MAPK signaling as predictors of primary endocrine treatment response and resistance in patients with breast cancer. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  I. Bradbury,et al.  Overview of the clinical effectiveness of positron emission tomography imaging in selected cancers. , 2007, Health technology assessment.

[22]  Seema A Khan,et al.  NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer screening and diagnosis. , 2009, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[23]  P. V. van Diest,et al.  Biologic correlates of (18)fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in human breast cancer measured by positron emission tomography. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  M. Kır,et al.  Clinical Experience with Tc‐99m MIBI Imaging in Patients with Malignant Tumors Preliminary Results and Comparison with TI‐201 , 1992, Clinical nuclear medicine.

[25]  D. Mankoff,et al.  Evaluation of the Internal Mammary Lymph Nodes by FDG-PET in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer (LABC) , 2004, American journal of clinical oncology.

[26]  R. Wahl,et al.  Initial experience with FDG-PET/CT in the evaluation of breast cancer , 2006, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[27]  C. Mathers,et al.  Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008 , 2010, International journal of cancer.

[28]  Manuela Milani,et al.  Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1α Expression Predicts a Poor Response to Primary Chemoendocrine Therapy and Disease-Free Survival in Primary Human Breast Cancer , 2006, Clinical Cancer Research.

[29]  R. Hicks,et al.  The utility of 18 F-FDG PET/CT for suspected recurrent breast cancer: impact and prognostic stratification , 2014, Cancer Imaging.

[30]  Mark Muzi,et al.  Tumor-Specific Positron Emission Tomography Imaging in Patients: [18F] Fluorodeoxyglucose and Beyond , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[31]  D. Mankoff,et al.  Quantitative fluoroestradiol positron emission tomography imaging predicts response to endocrine treatment in breast cancer. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[32]  P. Han,et al.  The role of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of breast cancer and lymph nodes metastases and micrometastases may be limited. , 2014, Hellenic journal of nuclear medicine.

[33]  Yiyan Liu Role of FDG PET-CT in evaluation of locoregional nodal disease for initial staging of breast cancer. , 2014, World journal of clinical oncology.

[34]  M. Campone,et al.  FDG PET evaluation of early axillary lymph node response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage II and III breast cancer patients , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[35]  C. Goldsmith,et al.  A Prospective Evaluation of Positron Emission Tomography Scanning, Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy, and Standard Axillary Dissection for Axillary Staging in Patients with Early Stage Breast Cancer , 2004, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[36]  S. Fanti,et al.  Potential utility of early metabolic response by 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in a selected group of breast cancer patients receiving preoperative chemotherapy. , 2013, European journal of cancer.

[37]  Xia Wang,et al.  Positron emission tomography/computed tomography potential pitfalls and artifacts. , 2009, Current problems in diagnostic radiology.

[38]  Federico Turkheimer,et al.  [18F]-3′Deoxy-3′-Fluorothymidine Positron Emission Tomography and Breast Cancer Response to Docetaxel , 2011, Clinical Cancer Research.

[39]  D. Mankoff,et al.  Factors influencing the uptake of 18F-fluoroestradiol in patients with estrogen receptor positive breast cancer. , 2011, Nuclear medicine and biology.

[40]  D. Rubello,et al.  Early bone marrow metastasis detection: the additional value of FDG-PET/CT vs. CT imaging. , 2012, Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie.

[41]  R L Wahl,et al.  Pitfalls in oncologic diagnosis with FDG PET imaging: physiologic and benign variants. , 1999, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[42]  D. Mankoff,et al.  Advances in molecular imaging for breast cancer detection and characterization , 2012, Breast Cancer Research.

[43]  E. Aboagye,et al.  Novel PET biomarkers for breast cancer imaging , 2011, Nuclear medicine communications.

[44]  R L Wahl,et al.  Metabolic monitoring of breast cancer chemohormonotherapy using positron emission tomography: initial evaluation. , 1993, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[45]  W. Han,et al.  Imaging sensitivity of dedicated positron emission mammography in relation to tumor size. , 2012, Breast.

[46]  Tsai-Wang Chang,et al.  Flare phenomenon in positron emission tomography in a case of breast cancer--a pitfall of positron emission tomography imaging interpretation. , 2009, Clinical imaging.

[47]  G. Weber Enzymology of cancer cells (first of two parts). , 1977, The New England journal of medicine.

[48]  W. Vogel,et al.  Prevention of Brown Adipose Tissue Activation in 18F-FDG PET/CT of Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

[49]  Alexandre Cochet,et al.  Role of positron emission tomography for the monitoring of response to therapy in breast cancer. , 2015, The Oncologist.

[50]  K. Tonkin,et al.  Clinical production, stability studies and PET imaging with 16-alpha-[18F]fluoroestradiol ([18F]FES) in ER positive breast cancer patients. , 2007, Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences.

[51]  Daniel Bell RadioGraphics , 2017, Radiopaedia.org.

[52]  K. Shadan,et al.  Available online: , 2012 .

[53]  P. Heudel,et al.  Value of PET-FDG in primary breast cancer based on histopathological and immunohistochemical prognostic factors , 2010, International Journal of Clinical Oncology.

[54]  David A. Mankoff,et al.  Quantitative Imaging of Estrogen Receptor Expression in Breast Cancer with PET and 18F-Fluoroestradiol , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[55]  D. Groheux,et al.  18F-FDG PET/CT in Staging Patients with Locally Advanced or Inflammatory Breast Cancer: Comparison to Conventional Staging , 2013, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[56]  D. Narayanan,et al.  Breast cancer detection using high-resolution breast PET compared to whole-body PET or PET/CT , 2014, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[57]  R. Coleman,et al.  Recommendations on the Use of 18F-FDG PET in Oncology , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[58]  S. Shousha,et al.  Quantification of cellular proliferation in tumor and normal tissues of patients with breast cancer by [18F]fluorothymidine-positron emission tomography imaging: evaluation of analytical methods. , 2005, Cancer research.

[59]  A. Scott,et al.  Hypoxia positron emission tomography imaging with 18f-fluoromisonidazole. , 2007, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[60]  Rachel F Brem,et al.  Breast-specific gamma imaging as an adjunct imaging modality for the diagnosis of breast cancer. , 2008, Radiology.

[61]  G. Fuhrman,et al.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of breast cancer. , 2013, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[62]  S. Rodenhuis,et al.  FDG PET/CT during neoadjuvant chemotherapy may predict response in ER-positive/HER2-negative and triple negative, but not in HER2-positive breast cancer. , 2013, Breast.

[63]  Guangyu Liu,et al.  18F-Fluoromisonidazole PET/CT: A Potential Tool for Predicting Primary Endocrine Therapy Resistance in Breast Cancer , 2013, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[64]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  Glucose metabolism of breast cancer assessed by 18F-FDG PET: histologic and immunohistochemical tissue analysis. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[65]  Paul J. van Diest,et al.  Biologic correlates of 18fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in human breast cancer measured by positron emission tomography , 2002 .

[66]  K. Gulenchyn,et al.  Is there a role for positron emission tomography in breast cancer staging? , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[67]  Z. Hall Cancer , 1906, The Hospital.

[68]  J. Brade,et al.  18 F-FDG PET/CT for initial staging in breast cancer patients – Is there a relevant impact on treatment planning compared to conventional staging modalities? , 2015, European Radiology.

[69]  J. Vercher-Conejero,et al.  Positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. , 2014, Seminars in roentgenology.

[70]  D. Narayanan,et al.  Breast cancer: comparative effectiveness of positron emission mammography and MR imaging in presurgical planning for the ipsilateral breast. , 2011, Radiology.

[71]  M. Welch,et al.  Metabolic flare: indicator of hormone responsiveness in advanced breast cancer. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[72]  Gerald Antoch,et al.  False-Positive FDG PET Uptake−the Role of PET/CT , 2006, European Radiology.

[73]  Dimitra Koulocheri,et al.  The current status of positron emission mammography in breast cancer diagnosis , 2013, Breast Cancer.

[74]  A. Alavi,et al.  Clinicopathologic factors associated with false negative FDG–PET in primary breast cancer , 2006, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[75]  Steven P. Larson,et al.  Standardized uptake value by positron emission tomography/computed tomography as a prognostic variable in metastatic breast cancer , 2012, Cancer.

[76]  K. Scheidhauer,et al.  FDG PET and other imaging modalities in the primary diagnosis of suspicious breast lesions , 2004, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[77]  H. Biersack,et al.  FDG-PET in monitoring therapy of breast cancer , 2004, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[78]  H. Dittmann,et al.  3'-Deoxy-3'-[(18)F]fluorothymidine (FLT) uptake in breast cancer cells as a measure of proliferation after doxorubicin and docetaxel treatment. , 2009, Nuclear medicine and biology.

[79]  P A Salvadori,et al.  Role of 2-[18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in the early assessment of response to chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer patients. , 2000, Clinical breast cancer.

[80]  G. Blake,et al.  Quantitative studies of bone with the use of 18F-fluoride and 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate. , 2001, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[81]  Wolfgang A Weber,et al.  Monitoring response to treatment in patients utilizing PET. , 2005, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[82]  J. Kurebayashi,et al.  Hypoxia Reduces Hormone Responsiveness of Human Breast Cancer Cells , 2001, Japanese journal of cancer research : Gann.

[83]  Sanjiv S Gambhir,et al.  A molecular imaging primer: modalities, imaging agents, and applications. , 2012, Physiological reviews.

[84]  Manuela Milani,et al.  Hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha expression predicts a poor response to primary chemoendocrine therapy and disease-free survival in primary human breast cancer. , 2006, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[85]  M. Welch,et al.  Positron emission tomography with 2-[18F]Fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose and 16alpha-[18F]fluoro-17beta-estradiol in breast cancer: correlation with estrogen receptor status and response to systemic therapy. , 1996, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[86]  E. Rutgers,et al.  Detection of extra-axillary lymph node involvement with FDG PET/CT in patients with stage II-III breast cancer. , 2010, European journal of cancer.

[87]  D. Groheux,et al.  Prognostic impact of 18F-FDG PET/CT staging and of pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer , 2015, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[88]  Deepa Narayanan,et al.  High‐Resolution Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography with Compression (“Positron Emission Mammography”) is Highly Accurate in Depicting Primary Breast Cancer , 2006, The breast journal.

[89]  Hubert Vesselle,et al.  FLT: measuring tumor cell proliferation in vivo with positron emission tomography and 3'-deoxy-3'-[18F]fluorothymidine. , 2007, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[90]  Yoon Jung Kang,et al.  The Effects of Preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT in Breast Cancer Patients in Comparison to the Conventional Imaging Study , 2012, Journal of breast cancer.

[91]  Jin You Kim,et al.  Tumour 18 F-FDG Uptake on preoperative PET/CT may predict axillary lymph node metastasis in ER-positive/HER2-negative and HER2-positive breast cancer subtypes , 2015, European Radiology.

[92]  V. Dilsizian,et al.  A pilot study of FDG PET/CT detects a link between brown adipose tissue and breast cancer , 2014, BMC Cancer.

[93]  Kei Yamada,et al.  Pitfalls of FDG-PET for the diagnosis of osteoblastic bone metastases in patients with breast cancer , 2005, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[94]  M. Salvatore,et al.  99mTc-MIBI in the evaluation of breast cancer biology , 2004, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[95]  Michael E. Phelps,et al.  Usefulness of 3′-[F-18]Fluoro-3′-deoxythymidine with Positron Emission Tomography in Predicting Breast Cancer Response to Therapy , 2005, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[96]  Barry A. Siegel,et al.  Prospective multicenter study of axillary nodal staging by positron emission tomography in breast cancer: a report of the staging breast cancer with PET Study Group. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[97]  M. J. García-Velloso,et al.  Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with sentinel lymph node biopsy for evaluation of axillary involvement in breast cancer , 2006, The British journal of surgery.