Positron Emission Tomography in Breast Cancer
暂无分享,去创建一个
J. Vercher-Conejero | Jose Luis Vercher-Conejero | Laura Pelegrí-Martinez | Diego Lopez-Aznar | María del Puig Cózar-Santiago | L. Pelegrí-Martinez | M. P. Cózar-Santiago | D. López-Aznar
[1] Rachel F Brem,et al. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ with mammography, breast specific gamma imaging, and magnetic resonance imaging: a comparative study. , 2007, Academic radiology.
[2] A. Iagaru,et al. Breast MRI and 18F FDG PET/CT in the management of breast cancer. , 2007, Annals of nuclear medicine.
[3] R. A. Valdés Olmos,et al. Molecular Imaging in Breast Cancer: From Whole-Body PET/CT to Dedicated Breast PET , 2012, Journal of oncology.
[4] A. Elster,et al. Recommendations on the Use of 18F-FDG PET in Oncology , 2009 .
[5] Michael Bader,et al. Early prediction of response to chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer using sequential 18F-FDG PET. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[6] E. Shiba,et al. Relationship between intrinsic subtypes and tumor responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer. , 2012, Breast disease.
[7] A. Alavi,et al. FDG PET positive lymph nodes are highly predictive of metastasis in breast cancer , 2006, Nuclear medicine communications.
[8] M. Halaç,et al. Correlation of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake with histopathological prognostic factors in breast carcinoma , 2013, Nuclear medicine communications.
[9] R. Herfkens,et al. Pilot Prospective Evaluation of 99mTc-MDP Scintigraphy, 18F NaF PET/CT, 18F FDG PET/CT and Whole-Body MRI for Detection of Skeletal Metastases , 2013, Clinical nuclear medicine.
[10] H. Saji. In Vivo Molecular Imaging. , 2017, Biological & pharmaceutical bulletin.
[11] Lalit Kumar,et al. The role of 18F-fluoride PET-CT in the detection of bone metastases in patients with breast, lung and prostate carcinoma: a comparison with FDG PET/CT and 99mTc-MDP bone scan , 2013, Japanese Journal of Radiology.
[12] J. Vercher-Conejero,et al. Recurrent and metastatic breast cancer PET, PET/CT, PET/MRI: FDG and new biomarkers. , 2013, The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR), [and] Section of the Society of....
[13] M. Mayerhoefer,et al. Integrated contrast-enhanced diagnostic whole-body PET/CT as a first-line restaging modality in patients with suspected metastatic recurrence of breast cancer. , 2010, European journal of radiology.
[14] Masatoshi Ishibashi,et al. Improved detection of breast cancer on FDG-PET cancer screening using breast positioning device , 2008, Annals of Nuclear Medicine.
[15] A. Hogg,et al. Powerful prognostic stratification by [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with high-dose chemotherapy. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[16] David A Mankoff,et al. FDG PET, PET/CT, and breast cancer imaging. , 2007, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.
[17] Robert N Hoover,et al. Breast cancer epidemiology according to recognized breast cancer risk factors in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial Cohort , 2009, BMC Cancer.
[18] Deepa Narayanan,et al. PET‐Guided Breast Biopsy , 2011, The breast journal.
[19] R. Kimmig,et al. Comparison of the Diagnostic Value of FDG-PET/CT and Axillary Ultrasound for the Detection of Lymph Node Metastases in Breast Cancer Patients , 2012, Acta radiologica.
[20] S. Fox,et al. Phosphorylated ERalpha, HIF-1alpha, and MAPK signaling as predictors of primary endocrine treatment response and resistance in patients with breast cancer. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[21] I. Bradbury,et al. Overview of the clinical effectiveness of positron emission tomography imaging in selected cancers. , 2007, Health technology assessment.
[22] Seema A Khan,et al. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer screening and diagnosis. , 2009, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.
[23] P. V. van Diest,et al. Biologic correlates of (18)fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in human breast cancer measured by positron emission tomography. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[24] M. Kır,et al. Clinical Experience with Tc‐99m MIBI Imaging in Patients with Malignant Tumors Preliminary Results and Comparison with TI‐201 , 1992, Clinical nuclear medicine.
[25] D. Mankoff,et al. Evaluation of the Internal Mammary Lymph Nodes by FDG-PET in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer (LABC) , 2004, American journal of clinical oncology.
[26] R. Wahl,et al. Initial experience with FDG-PET/CT in the evaluation of breast cancer , 2006, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[27] C. Mathers,et al. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008 , 2010, International journal of cancer.
[28] Manuela Milani,et al. Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1α Expression Predicts a Poor Response to Primary Chemoendocrine Therapy and Disease-Free Survival in Primary Human Breast Cancer , 2006, Clinical Cancer Research.
[29] R. Hicks,et al. The utility of 18 F-FDG PET/CT for suspected recurrent breast cancer: impact and prognostic stratification , 2014, Cancer Imaging.
[30] Mark Muzi,et al. Tumor-Specific Positron Emission Tomography Imaging in Patients: [18F] Fluorodeoxyglucose and Beyond , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.
[31] D. Mankoff,et al. Quantitative fluoroestradiol positron emission tomography imaging predicts response to endocrine treatment in breast cancer. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[32] P. Han,et al. The role of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of breast cancer and lymph nodes metastases and micrometastases may be limited. , 2014, Hellenic journal of nuclear medicine.
[33] Yiyan Liu. Role of FDG PET-CT in evaluation of locoregional nodal disease for initial staging of breast cancer. , 2014, World journal of clinical oncology.
[34] M. Campone,et al. FDG PET evaluation of early axillary lymph node response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage II and III breast cancer patients , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[35] C. Goldsmith,et al. A Prospective Evaluation of Positron Emission Tomography Scanning, Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy, and Standard Axillary Dissection for Axillary Staging in Patients with Early Stage Breast Cancer , 2004, Annals of Surgical Oncology.
[36] S. Fanti,et al. Potential utility of early metabolic response by 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in a selected group of breast cancer patients receiving preoperative chemotherapy. , 2013, European journal of cancer.
[37] Xia Wang,et al. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography potential pitfalls and artifacts. , 2009, Current problems in diagnostic radiology.
[38] Federico Turkheimer,et al. [18F]-3′Deoxy-3′-Fluorothymidine Positron Emission Tomography and Breast Cancer Response to Docetaxel , 2011, Clinical Cancer Research.
[39] D. Mankoff,et al. Factors influencing the uptake of 18F-fluoroestradiol in patients with estrogen receptor positive breast cancer. , 2011, Nuclear medicine and biology.
[40] D. Rubello,et al. Early bone marrow metastasis detection: the additional value of FDG-PET/CT vs. CT imaging. , 2012, Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie.
[41] R L Wahl,et al. Pitfalls in oncologic diagnosis with FDG PET imaging: physiologic and benign variants. , 1999, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.
[42] D. Mankoff,et al. Advances in molecular imaging for breast cancer detection and characterization , 2012, Breast Cancer Research.
[43] E. Aboagye,et al. Novel PET biomarkers for breast cancer imaging , 2011, Nuclear medicine communications.
[44] R L Wahl,et al. Metabolic monitoring of breast cancer chemohormonotherapy using positron emission tomography: initial evaluation. , 1993, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[45] W. Han,et al. Imaging sensitivity of dedicated positron emission mammography in relation to tumor size. , 2012, Breast.
[46] Tsai-Wang Chang,et al. Flare phenomenon in positron emission tomography in a case of breast cancer--a pitfall of positron emission tomography imaging interpretation. , 2009, Clinical imaging.
[47] G. Weber. Enzymology of cancer cells (first of two parts). , 1977, The New England journal of medicine.
[48] W. Vogel,et al. Prevention of Brown Adipose Tissue Activation in 18F-FDG PET/CT of Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.
[49] Alexandre Cochet,et al. Role of positron emission tomography for the monitoring of response to therapy in breast cancer. , 2015, The Oncologist.
[50] K. Tonkin,et al. Clinical production, stability studies and PET imaging with 16-alpha-[18F]fluoroestradiol ([18F]FES) in ER positive breast cancer patients. , 2007, Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences.
[51] Daniel Bell. RadioGraphics , 2017, Radiopaedia.org.
[52] K. Shadan,et al. Available online: , 2012 .
[53] P. Heudel,et al. Value of PET-FDG in primary breast cancer based on histopathological and immunohistochemical prognostic factors , 2010, International Journal of Clinical Oncology.
[54] David A. Mankoff,et al. Quantitative Imaging of Estrogen Receptor Expression in Breast Cancer with PET and 18F-Fluoroestradiol , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[55] D. Groheux,et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT in Staging Patients with Locally Advanced or Inflammatory Breast Cancer: Comparison to Conventional Staging , 2013, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[56] D. Narayanan,et al. Breast cancer detection using high-resolution breast PET compared to whole-body PET or PET/CT , 2014, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[57] R. Coleman,et al. Recommendations on the Use of 18F-FDG PET in Oncology , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[58] S. Shousha,et al. Quantification of cellular proliferation in tumor and normal tissues of patients with breast cancer by [18F]fluorothymidine-positron emission tomography imaging: evaluation of analytical methods. , 2005, Cancer research.
[59] A. Scott,et al. Hypoxia positron emission tomography imaging with 18f-fluoromisonidazole. , 2007, Seminars in nuclear medicine.
[60] Rachel F Brem,et al. Breast-specific gamma imaging as an adjunct imaging modality for the diagnosis of breast cancer. , 2008, Radiology.
[61] G. Fuhrman,et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of breast cancer. , 2013, The Surgical clinics of North America.
[62] S. Rodenhuis,et al. FDG PET/CT during neoadjuvant chemotherapy may predict response in ER-positive/HER2-negative and triple negative, but not in HER2-positive breast cancer. , 2013, Breast.
[63] Guangyu Liu,et al. 18F-Fluoromisonidazole PET/CT: A Potential Tool for Predicting Primary Endocrine Therapy Resistance in Breast Cancer , 2013, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[64] M. Schwaiger,et al. Glucose metabolism of breast cancer assessed by 18F-FDG PET: histologic and immunohistochemical tissue analysis. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[65] Paul J. van Diest,et al. Biologic correlates of 18fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in human breast cancer measured by positron emission tomography , 2002 .
[66] K. Gulenchyn,et al. Is there a role for positron emission tomography in breast cancer staging? , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[67] Z. Hall. Cancer , 1906, The Hospital.
[68] J. Brade,et al. 18 F-FDG PET/CT for initial staging in breast cancer patients – Is there a relevant impact on treatment planning compared to conventional staging modalities? , 2015, European Radiology.
[69] J. Vercher-Conejero,et al. Positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. , 2014, Seminars in roentgenology.
[70] D. Narayanan,et al. Breast cancer: comparative effectiveness of positron emission mammography and MR imaging in presurgical planning for the ipsilateral breast. , 2011, Radiology.
[71] M. Welch,et al. Metabolic flare: indicator of hormone responsiveness in advanced breast cancer. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[72] Gerald Antoch,et al. False-Positive FDG PET Uptake−the Role of PET/CT , 2006, European Radiology.
[73] Dimitra Koulocheri,et al. The current status of positron emission mammography in breast cancer diagnosis , 2013, Breast Cancer.
[74] A. Alavi,et al. Clinicopathologic factors associated with false negative FDG–PET in primary breast cancer , 2006, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[75] Steven P. Larson,et al. Standardized uptake value by positron emission tomography/computed tomography as a prognostic variable in metastatic breast cancer , 2012, Cancer.
[76] K. Scheidhauer,et al. FDG PET and other imaging modalities in the primary diagnosis of suspicious breast lesions , 2004, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[77] H. Biersack,et al. FDG-PET in monitoring therapy of breast cancer , 2004, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[78] H. Dittmann,et al. 3'-Deoxy-3'-[(18)F]fluorothymidine (FLT) uptake in breast cancer cells as a measure of proliferation after doxorubicin and docetaxel treatment. , 2009, Nuclear medicine and biology.
[79] P A Salvadori,et al. Role of 2-[18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in the early assessment of response to chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer patients. , 2000, Clinical breast cancer.
[80] G. Blake,et al. Quantitative studies of bone with the use of 18F-fluoride and 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate. , 2001, Seminars in nuclear medicine.
[81] Wolfgang A Weber,et al. Monitoring response to treatment in patients utilizing PET. , 2005, Radiologic clinics of North America.
[82] J. Kurebayashi,et al. Hypoxia Reduces Hormone Responsiveness of Human Breast Cancer Cells , 2001, Japanese journal of cancer research : Gann.
[83] Sanjiv S Gambhir,et al. A molecular imaging primer: modalities, imaging agents, and applications. , 2012, Physiological reviews.
[84] Manuela Milani,et al. Hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha expression predicts a poor response to primary chemoendocrine therapy and disease-free survival in primary human breast cancer. , 2006, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.
[85] M. Welch,et al. Positron emission tomography with 2-[18F]Fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose and 16alpha-[18F]fluoro-17beta-estradiol in breast cancer: correlation with estrogen receptor status and response to systemic therapy. , 1996, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.
[86] E. Rutgers,et al. Detection of extra-axillary lymph node involvement with FDG PET/CT in patients with stage II-III breast cancer. , 2010, European journal of cancer.
[87] D. Groheux,et al. Prognostic impact of 18F-FDG PET/CT staging and of pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer , 2015, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[88] Deepa Narayanan,et al. High‐Resolution Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography with Compression (“Positron Emission Mammography”) is Highly Accurate in Depicting Primary Breast Cancer , 2006, The breast journal.
[89] Hubert Vesselle,et al. FLT: measuring tumor cell proliferation in vivo with positron emission tomography and 3'-deoxy-3'-[18F]fluorothymidine. , 2007, Seminars in nuclear medicine.
[90] Yoon Jung Kang,et al. The Effects of Preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT in Breast Cancer Patients in Comparison to the Conventional Imaging Study , 2012, Journal of breast cancer.
[91] Jin You Kim,et al. Tumour 18 F-FDG Uptake on preoperative PET/CT may predict axillary lymph node metastasis in ER-positive/HER2-negative and HER2-positive breast cancer subtypes , 2015, European Radiology.
[92] V. Dilsizian,et al. A pilot study of FDG PET/CT detects a link between brown adipose tissue and breast cancer , 2014, BMC Cancer.
[93] Kei Yamada,et al. Pitfalls of FDG-PET for the diagnosis of osteoblastic bone metastases in patients with breast cancer , 2005, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[94] M. Salvatore,et al. 99mTc-MIBI in the evaluation of breast cancer biology , 2004, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[95] Michael E. Phelps,et al. Usefulness of 3′-[F-18]Fluoro-3′-deoxythymidine with Positron Emission Tomography in Predicting Breast Cancer Response to Therapy , 2005, Molecular Imaging and Biology.
[96] Barry A. Siegel,et al. Prospective multicenter study of axillary nodal staging by positron emission tomography in breast cancer: a report of the staging breast cancer with PET Study Group. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[97] M. J. García-Velloso,et al. Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with sentinel lymph node biopsy for evaluation of axillary involvement in breast cancer , 2006, The British journal of surgery.