Grass–Legume Mixtures and Soil Fertility Affect Cover Crop Performance and Weed Seed Production

Abstract Summer leguminous cover crops can improve soil health and reduce the economic and environmental costs associated with N fertilizers. However, adoption is often constrained by poor weed suppression compared to nonlegume cover crops. In field experiments conducted in organic vegetable cropping systems in north-central New York, two primary hypotheses were tested: (1) mixtures of legume cover crops (cowpea and soybean) with grasses (sorghum–sudangrass and Japanese millet) reduce weed seed production and increase cover crop productivity relative to legume monocultures and (2) higher soil fertility shifts the competitive outcome in favor of weeds and nonlegume cover crops. Cover crops were grown either alone or in grass–legume combinations with or without composted chicken manure. Under hot, dry conditions in 2005, cowpea and soybean cover crops were severely suppressed by weeds in monoculture and by sorghum–sudangrass in mixtures, resulting in low legume biomass, poor nodulation, and high levels of Powell amaranth seed production (> 25,000 seeds m−2). Under more typical temperature and rainfall conditions in 2006, cowpea mixtures with Japanese millet stimulated cowpea biomass production and nodulation compared to monoculture, but soybeans were suppressed in mixtures with both grasses. Composted chicken manure shifted competition in favor of weeds at the expense of cowpea (2005), stimulated weed and grass biomass production (2006), and suppressed nodulation of soybean (2006). In a complementary on-farm trial, cowpea mixtures with sorghum–sudangrass suppressed weed biomass by 99%; however, both common purslane and hairy galinsoga produced sufficient seeds (600 seeds m−2) to replenish the existing weed seedbank. Results suggest that (1) mixtures of cowpeas with grasses can improve nodulation, lower seed costs, and reduce the risk of weed seed production; (2) soybean is not compatible with grasses in mixture; and (3) future costs of weed seed production must be considered when determining optimal cover crop choices. Nomenclature: Common purslane, Portulaca oleracea L.; hairy galinsoga, Galinsoga ciliata (Ref.) Blake; Powell amaranth, Amaranthus powellii S. Wats; cowpea, Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walpers. ‘Red Ripper’; Japanese millet, Echinochloa frumentacea (Roxb.) Link; sorghum–sudangrass, Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench × Sorghum sudanese (P.) Stapf, ‘Sweetleaf II’; soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr.; buckwheat, Fagopyrum esculentum (L.) Moench.

[1]  Mathieu Ngouajio,et al.  Differential response of weeds and vegetable crops to aqueous extracts of hairy vetch and cowpea , 2006 .

[2]  A. DiTommaso,et al.  Intraspecific Variation in Seed Characteristics of Powell Amaranth (Amaranthus Powellii) from Habitats with Contrasting Crop Rotation Histories , 2007, Weed Science.

[3]  R. Snaydon Dynamics of weed populations , 1997 .

[4]  I. G. Palmblad,et al.  Germination Response of Weed Seeds to Soil Nitrate and Ammonium With and Without Simulated Overwintering , 1980, Weed Science.

[5]  H. C. Wien,et al.  Insect Populations on Cabbage Grown with Living Mulches , 1986 .

[6]  J. Masiunas,et al.  Collard—Cowpea Intercrop Response to Nitrogen Fertilization, Redroot Pigweed Density, and Collard Harvest Frequency , 1997 .

[7]  Antonio DiTommaso,et al.  Effects of canopy shade on the morphology, phenology, and seed characteristics of Powell amaranth (Amaranthus powellii) , 2005, Weed Science.

[8]  A. Whitney,et al.  Effects of Solar Radiation Regimes on Growth and N 2 Fixation of Soybean , Cowpea , and Bushbean , 2002 .

[9]  Robert E. Blackshaw,et al.  Differential response of weed species to added nitrogen , 2003, Weed Science.

[10]  D. Staniforth Responses of Soybean Varieties to Weed Competition1 , 1962 .

[11]  Richard N. Raynor,et al.  Weed control : a textbook and manual , 1942 .

[12]  K. Giller,et al.  Future benefits from biological nitrogen fixation: An ecological approach to agriculture , 1995, Plant and Soil.

[13]  K. Flach Low-input agriculture and soil conservation. , 1990 .

[14]  R. Reader Control of seedling emergence by ground cover: a potential mechanism involving seed predation. , 1991 .

[15]  M. Liebman,et al.  Crop Rotation and Intercropping Strategies for Weed Management. , 1993, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[16]  D. Landis,et al.  Influence of Refuge Habitats and Cover Crops on Seasonal Activity-Density of Ground Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in Field Crops , 1999 .

[17]  R. MacRae,et al.  The Effect of Green Manuring on the Physical Properties of Temperate-Area Soils , 1985 .

[18]  R. Myers,et al.  Intercrop performance of pearl millet, amaranth, cowpea, soybean, and guar in response to planting pattern and nitrogen fertilization , 1994 .

[19]  J. Vessey,et al.  Yield and symbiotic nitrogen fixation in a pea-mustard intercrop as influenced by N fertilizer addition. , 1994 .

[20]  Shu Fukai,et al.  Processes determining intercrop productivity and yields of component crops , 1993 .

[21]  A. J. Pieters Green Manuring: Principles and Practice , 1928, Nature.

[22]  D. R. Timmons,et al.  Soil tilth: a review of past perceptions and future needs. , 1990 .

[23]  A. Whitney,et al.  Effects of Solar Radiation Regimes on Growth and N2 Fixation of Soybean, Cowpea, and Bushbean1 , 1984 .

[24]  R. Lawn,et al.  Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation in Soybeans. I. Effect of Photosynthetic Source-Sink Manipulations 1 , 1974 .

[25]  N. Creamer,et al.  An evaluation of summer cover crops for use in vegetable production systems in North Carolina , 2000 .