Ability of the flexible hydroforming using segmented tool

The newly developed multipoint flexible hydroforming process is an adequate combination between hydroforming and multipoint forming processes to inherit flexibility and advantage synergies. The single reconfigurable tool allows better flexibility and faster and easier setting to produce varieties of doubly curved surface shells. After reviewing the recent flexible processes using reconfigurable tools, the new process using multifaceted-segmented tool and the theoretical basis was presented. Numerical model was developed and experimental setup was designed and realized to evaluate the ability of the new process, especially for thin shell parts. The investigations conducted on aluminum alloy blank sheets are focused on the sheet thickness and forming pressure as prevailing parameters, controlling the quality of produced shell. The analysis indicates particular favorable behavior of pivoting facets allowing to obtain better curvatures control and to avoid dimpling and edge buckling more than basic multipoint reconfigurable tool particularly for thin metal sheet product. The results obtained prove that the hydroforming with segmented tool is a relevant method to extent the latitude of the hydroforming process in flexibility and its ability for accurate doubly curved shell surface product.

[1]  Ming Zhe Li,et al.  Study of blank-holder technology on multi-point forming of thin sheet metal , 2007 .

[2]  Wei Liu,et al.  Numerical simulation of multi-point stretch forming and controlling on accuracy of formed workpiece , 2010 .

[3]  Ralf Dipl Ing Rieger,et al.  Recent developments in hydroforming technology , 2000 .

[4]  Zhongyi Cai,et al.  Numerical investigation of the influence of punch element in multi-point stretch forming process , 2010 .

[5]  Selmi Naceur,et al.  Finite Element and Experimental Investigation of the Multipoint Flexible Hydroforming , 2013 .

[6]  Qi Zhang,et al.  Numerical simulation of deformation in multi-point sandwich forming , 2006 .

[7]  Shi-Hong Zhang,et al.  Hydroforming Highlights: Sheet Hydroforming and Tube Hydroforming , 2004 .

[8]  A-M. Yan,et al.  Springback in stretch forming process of aeronautic panel production by finite element simulation , 2008 .

[9]  Wei Liu,et al.  Sectional multipoint forming technology for large-size sheet metal , 2005 .

[10]  Cai Zhongyi,et al.  Optimum path forming technique for sheet metal and its realization in multi-point forming , 2001 .

[11]  C. G. Liu,et al.  Stretching and trimming of high-speed train panels using multi-point tooling , 2015 .

[12]  Mingzhe Li,et al.  Multi-point forming: a flexible manufacturing method for a 3-d surface sheet , 1999 .

[13]  Wei Liu,et al.  Evaluation on dimpling and geometrical profile of curved surface shell by hydroforming with reconfigurable multipoint tool , 2016 .

[14]  Shaohui Wang,et al.  Numerical investigation of multi-point forming process for sheet metal: wrinkling, dimpling and springback , 2008 .

[15]  Jean-Claude Paul,et al.  Computing lines of curvature for implicit surfaces , 2009, Comput. Aided Geom. Des..

[16]  Qi Zhang,et al.  Multi-point sandwich forming of a spherical sector with tool-shape compensation , 2007 .

[17]  A. Erman Tekkaya,et al.  Modeling Flexforming (Fluid Cell Forming) Process with Finite Element Method , 2007 .

[18]  Ming-Zhe Li,et al.  Flexible manufacturing of sheet metal parts based on digitized-die , 2007 .

[19]  Pascal Frossard,et al.  Tangent space estimation for smooth embeddings of Riemannian manifolds , 2012 .