Mapping defoliation during a severe insect attack on Scots pine using airborne laser scanning

Abstract In a balanced experiment based on 20 field plots located in a 21 km 2 Scots pine forest in southeast Norway covering age classes from newly regenerated to old forest, leaf area index (LAI) was determined in field by a LAI-2000 instrument and hemispheric photography. Based on a formalized framework, i.e., the so-called Beer-Lambert law, gap fraction derived from small-footprint airborne laser scanner data was regressed against field-measured LAI. LAI was strongly ( R 2  = 0.87–0.93), positively, and linearly related to the log-transformed inverse of the gap fraction derived from the laser scanner data. This was as expected according to the Beer-Lambert law, as was the absence of an intercept, producing a directly proportionality of the two variables. We estimated an extinction coefficient for the first return echoes to be 0.7, fortunately fairly stable across age classes, and this is likely to be a parameter specific for the applied laser scanner system under the given flight and system settings, such as flying altitude and laser pulse repetition frequency. It was demonstrated that airborne laser was able to detect defoliation in terms of estimated changes in LAI, by three repeated laser data acquisitions over the area where severe insect attacks were going on in between the acquisitions.

[1]  Jb Miller,et al.  A formula for average foliage density , 1967 .

[2]  Emilio Chuvieco,et al.  Estimation of leaf area index and covered ground from airborne laser scanner (Lidar) in two contrasting forests , 2004 .

[3]  Åsa Persson,et al.  Identifying species of individual trees using airborne laser scanner , 2004 .

[4]  S. T. Gower,et al.  Leaf area index of boreal forests: theory, techniques, and measurements , 1997 .

[5]  E. Næsset.  Estimating timber volume of forest stands using airborne laser scanner data , 1997 .

[6]  E. Næsset,et al.  Laser scanning of forest resources: the nordic experience , 2004 .

[7]  J. Ross.  The radiation regime and architecture of plant stands , 1981, Tasks for vegetation sciences 3.

[8]  W. W. Carson,et al.  Accuracy of a high-resolution lidar terrain model under a conifer forest canopy , 2003 .

[9]  K. Kraus,et al.  Determination of terrain models in wooded areas with airborne laser scanner data , 1998 .

[10]  Ross Nelson,et al.  Measuring biomass and carbon in delaware using an airborne profiling LIDAR , 2004 .

[11]  W. Cohen,et al.  Surface lidar remote sensing of basal area and biomass in deciduous forests of eastern Maryland, USA , 1999 .

[12]  Sven Wagner,et al.  Calibration of grey values of hemispherical photographs for image analysis , 1998 .

[13]  C. T. Wit.  Photosynthesis of leaf canopies , 1965 .

[14]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Estimating forest growth using canopy metrics derived from airborne laser scanner data , 2005 .

[15]  E. Næsset.  Accuracy of forest inventory using airborne laser scanning: evaluating the first nordic full-scale operational project , 2004 .

[16]  R. Nelson,et al.  Determining forest canopy characteristics using airborne laser data , 1984 .

[17]  Åsa Persson,et al.  Detecting and measuring individual trees using an airborne laser scanner , 2002 .

[18]  K. Lim,et al.  Estimation of above ground forest biomass from airborne discrete return laser scanner data using canopy-based quantile estimators , 2004 .

[19]  M. Hodgson,et al.  Accuracy of Airborne Lidar-Derived Elevation: Empirical Assessment and Error Budget , 2004 .

[20]  Sven Wagner,et al.  Relative radiance measurements and zenith angle dependent segmentation in hemispherical photography , 2001 .

[21]  Erik Næsset,et al.  Effects of different flying altitudes on biophysical stand properties estimated from canopy height and density measured with a small-footprint airborne scanning laser , 2004 .

[22]  J. L. Innes,et al.  Consistency of observations of forest tree defoliation in three European countries , 1993, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[23]  J. Means,et al.  Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning lidar , 2000 .

[24]  Erik Næsset,et al.  Assessing sensor effects and effects of leaf-off and leaf-on canopy conditions on biophysical stand properties derived from small-footprint airborne laser data , 2005 .

[25]  Richard H. Waring,et al.  Forest Ecosystems: Concepts and Management , 1985 .

[26]  J. Means.  Use of Large-Footprint Scanning Airborne Lidar To Estimate Forest Stand Characteristics in the Western Cascades of Oregon , 1999 .

[27]  M. Lorenz.  International Co-operative Programme on Assessment and Monitoring of Air Pollution Effects on Forests-ICP Forests- , 1995 .

[28]  E. Næsset.  Practical large-scale forest stand inventory using a small-footprint airborne scanning laser , 2004 .

[29]  W. Cohen,et al.  Lidar Remote Sensing of the Canopy Structure and Biophysical Properties of Douglas-Fir Western Hemlock Forests , 1999 .

[30]  E. Næsset.  Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning laser using a practical two-stage procedure and field data , 2002 .

[31]  S. Magnussen,et al.  Derivations of stand heights from airborne laser scanner data with canopy-based quantile estimators , 1998 .

[32]  Denis Lachance,et al.  Forest Decline Concepts , 1992 .

[33]  J. Hicke,et al.  Global synthesis of leaf area index observations: implications for ecological and remote sensing studies , 2003 .

[34]  C. Kay.  Is Aspen Doomed? , 1997, Journal of Forestry.

[35]  Geoffrey G. Parker,et al.  Canopy light transmittance in a chronosequence of mixed-species deciduous forests , 1994 .

[36]  D. W. French,et al.  THE AMERICAN PHYTOPATHOLOGICAL SOCIETY. , 1943, Science.

[37]  Gregory A. Elmes,et al.  Gypsy moth invasion in North America: a quantitative analysis , 1992 .