The Effects of Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality, and Motion Parallax on Egocentric Depth Perception

A large number of previous studies have shown that egocentric depth perception tends to be underestimated in virtual reality (VR) - objects appear smaller and farther away than they should. Various theories as to why this might occur have been investigated, but to date the cause is not fully understood. A much smaller number of studies have investigated how depth perception operates in augmented reality (AR), and some of these studies have also indicated a similar underestimation effect. In this paper we report an experiment that further investigates these effects. The experiment compared VR and AR conditions to two real-world control conditions, and studied the effect of motion parallax across all conditions. Our combined VR and AR head-mounted display (HMD) allowed us to develop very careful calibration procedures based on real-world calibration widgets, which cannot be replicated with VR-only HMDs. To our knowledge, this is the first study to directly compare VR and AR conditions as part of the same experiment.

[1]  Peter Shirley,et al.  Visual cues for imminent object contact in realistic virtual environments , 2000 .

[2]  Frank H. Durgin,et al.  Distance Perception and the Visual Horizon in Head-Mounted Displays , 2005, TAP.

[3]  M. Lévesque.  Perception , 1986, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[4]  Peter Willemsen,et al.  Does the Quality of the Computer Graphics Matter when Judging Distances in Visually Immersive Environments? , 2004, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[5]  Wallace J. Sadowski,et al.  Nonvisually Guided Locomotion to a Previously Viewed Target in Real and Virtual Environments , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[6]  Peter Shirley,et al.  Visual cues for imminent object contact in realistic virtual environments , 2000, Proceedings Visualization 2000. VIS 2000 (Cat. No.00CH37145).

[7]  Peter Willemsen,et al.  Perceived egocentric distances in real, image-based, and traditional virtual environments , 2002, Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality 2002.

[8]  John P. Lewis,et al.  Perceptuomotor adaptation: more than meets the eye , 2002 .

[9]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Absolute motion parallax weakly determines visual scale in real and virtual environments , 1995, Electronic Imaging.

[10]  Deborah Hix,et al.  A Perceptual Matching Technique for Depth Judgments in Optical, See-Through Augmented Reality , 2006, IEEE Virtual Reality Conference (VR 2006).

[11]  Christine Ziemer,et al.  Making distance judgments in real and virtual environments: does order make a difference? , 2006, APGV '06.

[12]  Joshua Maclvor Knapp,et al.  The visual perception of egocentric distance in virtual environments , 2002 .

[13]  Jodie M. Plumert,et al.  Distance perception in real and virtual environments , 2004, APGV '04.

[14]  Peter Willemsen,et al.  The effects of head-mounted display mechanics on distance judgments in virtual environments , 2004, APGV '04.

[15]  J. Edward Swan,et al.  Objective measures for the effectiveness of augmented reality , 2005, IEEE Proceedings. VR 2005. Virtual Reality, 2005..

[16]  Eric Kolstad,et al.  Egocentric depth judgments in optical, see-through augmented reality , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[17]  Victoria Interrante,et al.  Distance Perception in Immersive Virtual Environments, Revisited , 2006, IEEE Virtual Reality Conference (VR 2006).

[18]  Jannick P. Rolland,et al.  Towards Quantifying Depth and Size Perception in Virtual Environments , 1993, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[19]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Visual perception of egocentric distance in real and virtual environments. , 2003 .