A Cable Driven Robotic System to Train Finger Function After Stroke

This paper presents a novel robotic interface to train intrinsic finger movements. The mechanical design, base on a cable system interacting with the fingers, offers the possibility of adapting the interface to accommodate various hand sizes and finger orientation. A main feature of the device is a clutch system, which consists of five clutches, one for each finger, that can be switched to three different modes: ( rest mode: the fingers are mechanically maintained at a fixed position, (ii) passive (from the view of the interface) mode: the finger is free to move along the path defined by the cable, and (iii) active mode: the force generated by the motor is applied to the finger.) With this mechanism, it is possible to train hand muscle function using only one actuator. The interaction wit the subject is measured by means of a position encoder an five force sensors located close to the output. We describe the human-oriented design of our underactuated robotic interface based on measured biomechanics. We detail the redundant safety mechanisms, the actuation, sensing and control system and report the performance and preliminary results obtained with this interface.

[1]  N. Hogan,et al.  Motions or muscles? Some behavioral factors underlying robotic assistance of motor recovery. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[2]  W. Rymer,et al.  Relative contributions of neural mechanisms versus muscle mechanics in promoting finger extension deficits following stroke , 2003, Muscle & nerve.

[3]  Etienne Burdet,et al.  A Haptic Knob for Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients , 2006, 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[4]  Robert Riener,et al.  ARMin - robot for rehabilitation of the upper extremities , 2006, Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006..

[5]  H.I. Krebs,et al.  Whole-Arm Rehabilitation Following Stroke: Hand Module , 2006, The First IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, 2006. BioRob 2006..

[6]  Peter Crome,et al.  Hand function and stroke , 2002 .

[7]  M. Munih,et al.  HIFE-haptic interface for finger exercise , 2006, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[8]  Maarten J. IJzerman,et al.  Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[9]  Robert Riener,et al.  Robot-aided neurorehabilitation of the upper extremities , 2005, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[10]  T. Kline,et al.  Control system for pneumatically controlled glove to assist in grasp activities , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[11]  Steven C Cramer,et al.  Robotics, motor learning, and neurologic recovery. , 2004, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[12]  Mark Hallett,et al.  Recent Advances in Stroke Rehabilitation , 2002, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[13]  Marc H Schieber,et al.  Hand function: peripheral and central constraints on performance. , 2004, Journal of applied physiology.

[14]  M. Schieber,et al.  Differential impairment of individuated finger movements in humans after damage to the motor cortex or the corticospinal tract. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  H. Kawsaki,et al.  Hand rehabilitation support system based on self-motion-control , 2004, IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. TExCRA Technical Exhibition Based..

[16]  Grigore C. Burdea,et al.  The Rutgers Master II-new design force-feedback glove , 2002 .

[17]  W. Rymer,et al.  Robot-assisted movement training for the stroke-impaired arm: Does it matter what the robot does? , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.