The relationship between porosity and specific surface in human cortical bone is subject specific.

A characteristic relationship for bone between bone volume fraction (BV/TV) and specific surface (BS/TV) has previously been proposed based on 2D histological measurements. This relationship has been suggested to be bone intrinsic, i.e., to not depend on bone type, bone site and health state. In these studies, only limited data comes from cortical bone. The aim of this paper was to investigate the relationship between BV/TV and BS/TV in human cortical bone using high-resolution micro-CT imaging and the correlations with subject-specific biometric data such as height, weight, age and sex. Images from femoral cortical bone samples of the Melbourne Femur Collection were obtained using synchrotron radiation micro-CT (SPring8, Japan). Sixteen bone samples from thirteen individuals were analysed in order to find bone volume fraction values ranging from 0.20 to 1. Finally, morphological models of the tissue microstructure were developed to help explain the relationship between BV/TV and BS/TV. Our experimental findings indicate that the BV/TV vs BS/TV relationship is subject specific rather than intrinsic. Sex and pore density were statistically correlated with the individual curves. However no correlation was found with body height, weight or age. Experimental cortical data points deviate from interpolating curves previously proposed in the literature. However, these curves are largely based on data points from trabecular bone samples. This finding challenges the universality of the curve: highly porous cortical bone is significantly different to trabecular bone of the same porosity. Finally, our morphological models suggest that changes in BV/TV within the same sample can be explained by an increase in pore area rather than in pore density. This is consistent with the proposed mechanisms of age-related endocortical bone loss. In addition, these morphological models highlight that the relationship between BV/TV and BS/TV is not linear at high BV/TV as suggested in the literature but is closer to a square root function.

[1]  H. Frost.  Skeletal structural adaptations to mechanical usage (SATMU): 4. Mechanical influences on intact fibrous tissues , 1990, The Anatomical record.

[2]  R. Müller,et al.  The discrete nature of trabecular bone microarchitecture affects implant stability. , 2012, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  William E. Lorensen,et al.  Marching cubes: a high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm , 1996 .

[4]  S. Judex,et al.  Baseline bone morphometry and cellular activity modulate the degree of bone loss in the appendicular skeleton during disuse. , 2008, Bone.

[5]  H. Frost.  Bone “mass” and the “mechanostat”: A proposal , 1987, The Anatomical record.

[6]  Peter Pivonka,et al.  The influence of bone surface availability in bone remodelling: A mathematical model including coupled geometrical and biomechanical regulations of bone cells , 2012, 1201.3170.

[7]  M P Akhter,et al.  A noninvasive, in vivo model for studying strain adaptive bone modeling. , 1991, Bone.

[8]  N Loveridge,et al.  Super‐osteons (remodeling clusters) in the cortex of the femoral shaft: Influence of age and gender , 2001, The Anatomical record.

[9]  R. B. Martin,et al.  The usefulness of mathematical models for bone remodeling , 1985 .

[10]  John G Clement,et al.  Regional variation of intracortical porosity in the midshaft of the human femur: age and sex differences , 2005, Journal of anatomy.

[11]  R. Recker,et al.  Bone histomorphometry : techniques and interpretation , 1983 .

[12]  Martin Rb.  Porosity and specific surface of bone. , 1984 .

[13]  Lance E. Lanyon,et al.  Functional adaptation to mechanical loading in both cortical and cancellous bone is controlled locally and is confined to the loaded bones , 2010, Bone.

[14]  C. K. Jackson,et al.  The scanning electron microscope in studies of trabecular bone from a human vertebral body. , 1971, Journal of anatomy.

[15]  N L Fazzalari,et al.  Direct calculation of the surface-to-volume ratio for human cancellous bone. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  David P. Fyhrie,et al.  Cancellous bone biomechanics , 1999 .

[17]  R. Martin,et al.  The effects of geometric feedback in the development of osteoporosis. , 1972, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  H. Frost.  Bone's mechanostat: a 2003 update. , 2003, The anatomical record. Part A, Discoveries in molecular, cellular, and evolutionary biology.

[19]  B. van Rietbergen,et al.  An analytical approach to investigate the evolution of bone volume fraction in bone remodeling simulation at the tissue and cell level. , 2014, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[20]  Brianna L. Martin,et al.  A model for the change of cancellous bone volume and structure over time. , 2012, Mathematical biosciences.

[21]  J A Anderson,et al.  Quantitative histological studies on age changes in bone. , 1967, The Journal of pathology and bacteriology.

[22]  D P Fyhrie,et al.  Human vertebral cancellous bone surface distribution. , 1995, Bone.

[23]  G. Marotti,et al.  The osteocyte as a wiring transmission system. , 2000, Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions.

[24]  L E Lanyon,et al.  Control of bone architecture by functional load bearing , 1992, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[25]  Daniel Chappard,et al.  Comparison Insight Bone Measurements by Histomorphometry and μCT , 2005 .

[26]  Ego Seeman,et al.  Intracortical remodelling and porosity in the distal radius and post-mortem femurs of women: a cross-sectional study , 2010, The Lancet.

[27]  J. M. García-Aznar,et al.  A bone remodelling model coupling microdamage growth and repair by 3D BMU-activity , 2005, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[28]  E R Morey,et al.  Inhibition of bone formation during space flight. , 1978, Science.

[29]  W. Kraemer,et al.  Biological constraints that limit compensation of a common skeletal trait variant lead to inequivalence of tibial function among healthy young adults , 2011, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[30]  S. Goldstein,et al.  Evaluation of a microcomputed tomography system to study trabecular bone structure , 1990, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[31]  N L Fazzalari,et al.  Mathematical modelling of trabecular bone structure: the evaluation of analytical and quantified surface to volume relationships in the femoral head and iliac crest. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[32]  J. Clement,et al.  Increase in pore area, and not pore density, is the main determinant in the development of porosity in human cortical bone , 2006, Journal of anatomy.

[33]  R. Rizzoli,et al.  Alterations of bone microstructure and strength in end-stage renal failure , 2013, Osteoporosis International.

[34]  William J Browne,et al.  Bones' Adaptive Response to Mechanical Loading Is Essentially Linear Between the Low Strains Associated With Disuse and the High Strains Associated With the Lamellar/Woven Bone Transition , 2012, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[35]  Ralph Müller,et al.  Local Mechanical Stimuli Regulate Bone Formation and Resorption in Mice at the Tissue Level , 2013, PloS one.

[36]  Françoise Peyrin,et al.  Spatial distribution of tissue level properties in a human femoral cortical bone. , 2012, Journal of biomechanics.

[37]  P. Rüegsegger,et al.  Morphometric analysis of human bone biopsies: a quantitative structural comparison of histological sections and micro-computed tomography. , 1998, Bone.

[38]  P. Laugier,et al.  A determination of the minimum sizes of representative volume elements for the prediction of cortical bone elastic properties , 2011, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[39]  J. Clement,et al.  Endocortical bone loss in osteoporosis: the role of bone surface availability , 2012, International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering.

[40]  Paul C. Rambaut,et al.  Effects of long-duration space flight on calcium metabolism: Review of human studies from Skylab to the present , 2006 .

[41]  Z. Jaworski,et al.  Cellular-level bone resorption in chronic renal failure and primary hyperparathyroidism , 1970, Calcified Tissue Research.

[42]  M. Drezner,et al.  Bone histomorphometry: Standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units: Report of the asbmr histomorphometry nomenclature committee , 1987, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[43]  E. Seeman,et al.  Age-related Changes in Bone Remodeling and Microarchitecture , 2010 .

[44]  H. Rodrigues,et al.  Numerical modeling of bone tissue adaptation--a hierarchical approach for bone apparent density and trabecular structure. , 2009, Journal of Biomechanics.

[45]  R. Rizzoli,et al.  Effects of strontium ranelate and alendronate on bone microstructure in women with osteoporosis , 2011, Osteoporosis International.

[46]  K. Jepsen,et al.  Intracortical Remodeling Parameters Are Associated With Measures of Bone Robustness , 2014, Anatomical record.

[47]  M. Djuric,et al.  Micro-morphological properties of osteons reveal changes in cortical bone stability during aging, osteoporosis, and bisphosphonate treatment in women , 2013, Osteoporosis International.

[48]  J M Vogel,et al.  Effect of prolonged bed rest on bone mineral. , 1970, Metabolism: clinical and experimental.

[49]  X. Guo,et al.  Assessment of trabecular and cortical architecture and mechanical competence of bone by high-resolution peripheral computed tomography: comparison with transiliac bone biopsy , 2009, Osteoporosis International.