Effect of Surfactant on FRET and Quenching in DNA Sequence Detection Using Conjugated Polymers

The effect of a nonionic surfactant on various energy-transfer and quenching processes in deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) sequence detection using the cationic conjugated polymer (CCP) poly{[9,9-bis(N,N,N-trimethylammonium)hexylfluorene]-co-1,4-phenylene diiodide) and peptide nucleic acid labeled with fluorescein (PNA-Flu*) has been investigated. Steady-state and time-resolved measurements reveal that nonionic surfactant enhances both sensitivity and selectivity in targeted DNA sequence detection. The enhancement of the sensitivity is ascribed to an increase in the CCP quantum yield due to the surfactant breaking up polymer aggregates, increasing the isolated polymer chain concentration, and reducing interchain quenching. This also increases the polymer surface-to-volume ratio. The sensitivity is also improved as the surfactant reduces CCP quenching by DNA and buffer solution through incorporation of the CCP in micelles, which reduces charge-transfer processes. Enhancement of the selectivity is achieved through the reduction of the hydrophobic interaction between the CCP and free PNA-Flu*. Time-resolved fluorescence lifetime analysis provides an effective way to differentiate these particular effects in the DNA-PNA-Flu assays. Comparing the decay profiles of the CCP, CCP/DNA, and CCP/complementary DNA:PNA-Flu*, it was found that both surfactant and DNA do not alter dramatically the isolated polymer chain lifetime (the first increases the concentration of the single chains by breaking up the polymer aggregation and the latter reduces the concentration of the isolated polymer chain by static quenching), therefore the change in the isolated polymer chain fluorescence lifetime can predominantly reflect the quenching of the donor by FRET to the PNA fluorescent label. Here, surfactant increases Forster radius by enhancing the polymer fluorescence quantum yield. Furthermore, surfactant also increases the difference in the donor lifetimes between the complementary and noncomplementary cases. This difference reflects the increase in the energy-transfer efficiency and hence higher selectivity. Fluorescein quenching is mediated by the CCP which causes Flu*-Flu* self-quenching via a PNA-CCP hydrophobic interaction. Optimization or minimization of various interactions to achieve the best DNA detection sensor is discussed.

[1]  Ullrich Scherf,et al.  Semiconducting Polyfluorenes—Towards Reliable Structure–Property Relationships , 2002 .

[2]  Alan J. Heeger,et al.  DNA detection using water-soluble conjugated polymers and peptide nucleic acid probes , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  A. L. Thompson,et al.  Energy and electron transfer in bifunctional non-conjugated dendrimers. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[4]  A. J. Heeger,et al.  Photoinduced Electron Transfer from a Conducting Polymer to Buckminsterfullerene , 1992, Science.

[5]  S. Wasik,et al.  Fluorescence measurements of benzene, naphthalene, anthracene, pyrene, fluoranthene, and benzo(e)pyrene in water. , 1976, Analytical chemistry.

[6]  D. Moses,et al.  Photoluminescence of water-soluble conjugated polymers : Origin of enhanced Quenching by charge transfer , 2000 .

[7]  A. Heeger,et al.  Biosensors from conjugated polyelectrolyte complexes , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Peter E. Nielsen,et al.  Peptide nucleic acids (PNA) : oligonucleotide analogues with an achiral peptide backbone , 1992 .

[9]  Joseph Wang SURVEY AND SUMMARY From DNA biosensors to gene chips , 2000 .

[10]  Miller,et al.  Interchain Excitations in Conjugated Polymers. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[11]  B. Nordén,et al.  Thermodynamics of sequence-specific binding of PNA to DNA. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[12]  C. Pearson,et al.  Solubilization of polyelectrolytic hairy-rod polyfluorene in aqueous solutions of nonionic surfactant. , 2006, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[13]  C. Mirkin,et al.  Scanometric DNA array detection with nanoparticle probes. , 2000, Science.

[14]  A. Monkman,et al.  Improved single nucleotide polymorphisms detection using conjugated polymer/surfactant system and peptide nucleic acid. , 2008, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[15]  Huixiang Li,et al.  Colorimetric detection of DNA sequences based on electrostatic interactions with unmodified gold nanoparticles. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  G. Bazan,et al.  Fluorescein provides a resonance gate for FRET from conjugated polymers to DNA intercalated dyes. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[17]  Duncan W. McBranch,et al.  Detection of DNA Hybridization via Fluorescent Polymer Superquenching , 2002 .

[18]  A. Monkman,et al.  Effect of surfactant on water-soluble conjugated polymer used in biosensor. , 2007, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[19]  G. Bazan,et al.  Optimization of the molecular orbital energies of conjugated polymers for optical amplification of fluorescent sensors. , 2006, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[20]  Duncan W. McBranch,et al.  Detection of Single Nucleotide Mismatches via Fluorescent Polymer Superquenching , 2003 .

[21]  J. Eastman,et al.  Interaction of the benzene molecule with liquid solvents. Fluorescence quenching parallels (0-0) ultraviolet absorption intensity , 1970 .

[22]  D. Moses,et al.  Time-resolved energy transfer in DNA sequence detection using water-soluble conjugated polymers: the role of electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  P. Sorger,et al.  Electronic detection of DNA by its intrinsic molecular charge , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  Gustavo Rivas,et al.  Detection of point mutation in the p53 gene using a peptide nucleic acid biosensor , 1997 .

[25]  F. Wudl,et al.  Highly sensitive biological and chemical sensors based on reversible fluorescence quenching in a conjugated polymer. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  Susan R. Mikkelsen,et al.  Electrochecmical biosensors for DNA sequence detection , 1996 .

[27]  Fred Russell Kramer,et al.  Efficiencies of fluorescence resonance energy transfer and contact-mediated quenching in oligonucleotide probes. , 2002, Nucleic acids research.

[28]  Denis Boudreau,et al.  Direct molecular detection of nucleic acids by fluorescence signal amplification. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[29]  M. Boissinot,et al.  Colorimetric and fluorometric detection of nucleic acids using cationic polythiophene derivatives. , 2002, Angewandte Chemie.

[30]  G. Bazan,et al.  Interpolyelectrolyte complexes of conjugated copolymers and DNA: platforms for multicolor biosensors. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[31]  M. Egholm,et al.  Sequence-selective recognition of DNA by strand displacement with a thymine-substituted polyamide. , 1991, Science.

[32]  John J. Lavigne,et al.  ``Surfactochromic'' Conjugated Polymers: Surfactant Effects on Sugar-Substituted PPEs , 2003 .

[33]  M. Leclerc Optical and Electrochemical Transducers Based on Functionalized Conjugated Polymers , 1999 .

[34]  G. Findenegg,et al.  Structural Transition of Oil-Swollen Cylindrical Micelles of C12E5 in Water Studied by SANS , 2003 .

[35]  U. Scherf,et al.  Fluorescence Enhancement of the Water- Soluble Poly{1,4-phenylene-[9,9-bis- (4-phenoxybutylsulfonate)]fluorene-2,7-diyl} Copolymer in n-Dodecylpentaoxyethylene Glycol Ether Micelles , 2004 .