Stakeholder engagement in patient-centered outcomes research: high-touch or high-tech?

Patient and stakeholder engagement enhances the meaningfulness of patient-centered outcomes research. Continuous engagement of diverse patients helps to achieve representativeness and to avoid tokenism, but is perceived as challenging due to resource and time constraints. The widespread availability of the internet, mobile phones, and electronic devices makes ‘high-tech’ solutions appealing, but such approaches may trade-off larger sample sizes for shallower engagement and/or skewed perspectives if most participants reflect users of technology. More traditional ‘high-touch’ solutions such as in-person interviews, focus groups, and town hall meetings can provide qualitative and sociological context and potentially more in-depth insights from small numbers of patients, but such approaches are also prone to selection bias as well. We compare and contrast high-tech and high-touch approaches to engaging stakeholders and suggest hybrid processes.

[1]  J. Sweeney,et al.  Patient and family engagement: a framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies. , 2013, Health affairs.

[2]  D. Flum,et al.  A model for incorporating patient and stakeholder voices in a learning health care network: Washington State's Comparative Effectiveness Research Translation Network. , 2013, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[3]  K N Lohr,et al.  Community-based participatory research: assessing the evidence. , 2004, Evidence report/technology assessment.

[4]  C. Brady,et al.  The Department of Veterans Affairs Biorepository Brain Bank: A national resource for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis research , 2013, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration.

[5]  M. Massagli,et al.  Measuring function in advanced ALS: validation of ALSFRS‐EX extension items , 2009, European journal of neurology.

[6]  D M Eddy,et al.  The quality of medical evidence: implications for quality of care. , 1988, Health affairs.

[7]  Scott D Ramsey,et al.  Stakeholder participation in comparative effectiveness research: defining a framework for effective engagement. , 2012, Journal of comparative effectiveness research.

[8]  Elisa Cascade,et al.  Conducting Research on the Internet: Medical Record Data Integration with Patient-Reported Outcomes , 2012, Journal of medical Internet research.

[9]  E. Zerhouni The NIH Roadmap , 2003, Science.

[10]  Wendell Bell,et al.  The Third Wave. , 1982 .

[11]  Kathryn Zickuhr,et al.  Who’s Not Online and Why , 2013 .

[12]  Rachael Fleurence,et al.  How the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute is engaging patients and others in shaping its research agenda. , 2013, Health affairs.

[13]  D. Stryer,et al.  Practical clinical trials: increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy. , 2003, JAMA.

[14]  Scott D Ramsey,et al.  Facilitating comparative effectiveness research in cancer genomics: evaluating stakeholder perceptions of the engagement process. , 2012, Journal of comparative effectiveness research.

[15]  R. MacDonald What is Cultural Competency? , 1998 .

[16]  D. Helitzer,et al.  Identifying Barriers to Healthcare to Reduce Health Disparity in Zuni Indians Using Focus Group Conducted by Community Health Workers , 2014, Clinical and translational science.

[17]  Sharon Silow-Carroll,et al.  Clinical management apps: creating partnerships between providers and patients. , 2013, Issue brief.

[18]  Jocelyn Chu,et al.  A Funding Initiative for Community-Based Participatory Research: Lessons from the Harvard Catalyst Seed Grants , 2011, Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action.

[19]  T. Greenhalgh,et al.  Uncovering the Benefits of Participatory Research: Implications of a Realist Review for Health Research and Practice , 2012, The Milbank quarterly.

[20]  P. Pirraglia,et al.  Barriers and Facilitators of Treatment for Depression in a Latino Community: A Focus Group Study , 2012, Community Mental Health Journal.

[21]  Max A. Little,et al.  The Virtuous Circle of the Quantified Self: A Human Computational Approach to Improved Health Outcomes , 2013, Handbook of Human Computation.

[22]  E. Saunders,et al.  Social Networks Help Control Hypertension , 2013, Journal of clinical hypertension.

[23]  M. Massagli,et al.  Perceived benefits of sharing health data between people with epilepsy on an online platform , 2012, Epilepsy & Behavior.

[24]  M. Swan Crowdsourced Health Research Studies: An Important Emerging Complement to Clinical Trials in the Public Health Research Ecosystem , 2012, Journal of medical Internet research.

[25]  J. Frost,et al.  Sharing Health Data for Better Outcomes on PatientsLikeMe , 2010, Journal of medical Internet research.

[26]  Kalpana Shankar,et al.  Making Sense of Mobile- and Web-Based Wellness Information Technology: Cross-Generational Study , 2013, Journal of medical Internet research.

[27]  B. Israel,et al.  Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. , 1998, Annual review of public health.

[28]  J. Cedarbaum,et al.  The ALSFRS-R: a revised ALS functional rating scale that incorporates assessments of respiratory function , 1999, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[29]  M. E. Wewers,et al.  Survey of Community Engagement in NIH‐Funded Research , 2010, Clinical and translational science.

[30]  G. Eysenbach The Law of Attrition , 2005, Journal of medical Internet research.

[31]  James S. Fishkin,et al.  Community Forum Deliberative Methods Demonstration : Evaluating Effectiveness and Eliciting Public Views on Use of Evidence Executive Summary , 2013 .

[32]  M. Massagli,et al.  Accelerated clinical discovery using self-reported patient data collected online and a patient-matching algorithm , 2011, Nature Biotechnology.

[33]  H. Heinze,et al.  Validation of the German version of the extended ALS functional rating scale as a patient-reported outcome measure , 2013, Journal of Neurology.

[34]  S. Tunis,et al.  A clinical research strategy to support shared decision making. , 2005, Health affairs.

[35]  Inder M. Verma,et al.  The NIH Roadmap , 2004 .

[36]  Patricia A Deverka,et al.  Stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness research: how will we measure success? , 2012, Journal of comparative effectiveness research.

[37]  R. Brook,et al.  Health services research: is it good for you and me? , 1989, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[38]  C. Clancy,et al.  AHRQ's Effective Health Care Program: Why Comparative Effectiveness Matters , 2009, American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality.

[39]  H. Greely,et al.  The Henrietta Lacks legacy grows , 2013, EMBO reports.

[40]  Paul Wicks,et al.  Evaluation of an Online Platform for Multiple Sclerosis Research: Patient Description, Validation of Severity Scale, and Exploration of BMI Effects on Disease Course , 2013, PloS one.

[41]  Amy P Abernethy,et al.  Recommendations for incorporating patient-reported outcomes into clinical comparative effectiveness research in adult oncology. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[42]  D. Lavallee,et al.  Continuous patient engagement in comparative effectiveness research. , 2012, JAMA.

[43]  Bradford W. Hesse,et al.  Realizing the Promise of Web 2.0: Engaging Community Intelligence , 2011, Journal of health communication.

[44]  R. Cicerone Initial National Priorities for Comparative Effectiveness Research , 2009 .

[45]  J. Eyles,et al.  Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. , 2003, Social science & medicine.

[46]  Suzanne Christopher,et al.  Building and maintaining trust in a community-based participatory research partnership. , 2008, American journal of public health.

[47]  Tamara Sawyer The Office of Minority Health , 2013, Asian American and Pacific Islander journal of health.

[48]  Tsipi Heart,et al.  Older adults: Are they ready to adopt health-related ICT? , 2013, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[49]  R. Gombrich,et al.  Assessing the evidence. , 2009, Occasional paper.