Studying Strategies and Their Implications for Textbook Design

Publisher Summary This chapter presents the notion that the demands of studying from text can be affected in beneficial ways by changing the characteristics of the text itself. The chapter presents some of the major dimensions of studying—clarifying the criteria for studying, focusing attention on the relevant text segments, and engaging in high payoff encoding activities—to lend support to this notion,. These dimensions of studying are merged with four qualities of text—structure, coherence, unity, and audience appropriateness—that appear to affect how well students can read and understand it. Some of the reasons why would think high-quality text helps studying are (1) criteria for studying will be clearer to students because the titles, headings and topic sentences help the student identify the questions that the text is answering and (2) focusing attention will be easier because each idea unit in the regular text is important, in that it contributes to an answer and/or a question. The idea units that have a high probability of being nonessential are clearly marked as such by being in a box. The hierarchical structure of the text and high degree of unity make it easy and efficient for students to locate a specific text unit. Entire chunks of irrelevant text can be easily identified and skipped over.

[1]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Schemata as Scaffolding for the Representation of Information in Connected Discourse , 1977 .

[2]  Diane L. Schallert,et al.  Improving Memory for Prose: The Relationship between Depth of Processing and Context. Technical Report No. 5. , 1975 .

[3]  William G. Holliday,et al.  Teaching verbal chains using flow diagrams and texts , 1976 .

[4]  Susan M. Shimmerlik Organization Theory and Memory for Prose: A Review of the Literature , 1978 .

[5]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Frameworks for Comprehending Discourse , 1977 .

[6]  P. David Pearson The Effects of Grammatical Complexity on Children's Comprehension, Recall, and Conception of Certain Semantic Relations. , 1974 .

[7]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[8]  Bonnie J. F. Meyer,et al.  Integrating Information From Text: An Evaluation of Current Theories , 1980 .

[9]  Nancy Marshall,et al.  Comprehension of connected discourse: a study into the relationships between the structure of text and information recalled* , 1978 .

[10]  George L. Gropper,et al.  The design of stimulus materials in response-oriented programs , 1970 .

[11]  Donald F. Dansereau,et al.  Development and Evaluation of a Learning Strategy Training Program. , 1979 .

[12]  William G. Holliday,et al.  Differential cognitive and affective responses to flow diagrams in science , 1977 .

[13]  James F. Voss,et al.  Text Processing of Domain-Related Information for Individuals with High and Low Domain Knowledge: Methodological Considerations. , 1979 .

[14]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall , 1972 .

[15]  William G. Holliday,et al.  Adjunct labeled drawings in teaching physics to junior high school students , 1976 .

[16]  William G. Holliday,et al.  The Effects of Verbal and Adjunct Pictorial-Verbal Information in Science Instruction. , 1975 .