Paradox of Coordination and Control

This article describes the contrasting systems of coordination and control at American and Southwest Airlines. Contrary to popular belief, the best way to achieve coordination in high velocity settings like the airline industry is not to create a flat organization based on performance measurement and little supervision. Rather it is better to build an organization based on cross-functional accountability to diffuse blame, with adequate supervisory staffing to provide coaching and feedback. Coordination benefits from strengthening this role of supervisors while weakening the role of accountability and performance measurement.

[1]  V. Ridgway.  Dysfunctional Consequences of Performance Measurements , 1956 .

[2]  D. Mcgregor,et al.  The Human Side of Enterprise , 1960 .

[3]  Peter M. Blau,et al.  Interdependence and hierarchy in organizations , 1972 .

[4]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Determinants of Coordination Modes within Organizations , 1976 .

[5]  W. Ouchi.  A Conceptual Framework for the Design of Organizational Control Mechanisms , 1979 .

[6]  R. Pledger.  The Organizational Life Cycle: Issues in the Creation, Transformation, and Decline of Organizations , 1981 .

[7]  W. Diebold,et al.  The Second Industrial Divide , 1985 .

[8]  Steven Kerr,et al.  Effects of Different Leader Behaviors under Different Levels of Task Interdependence , 1986 .

[9]  J. Hackman,et al.  Groups under contrasting management strategies , 1986 .

[10]  J. Hackman,et al.  The design of work teams , 1987 .

[11]  Rafik I. Beekun,et al.  Assessing the Effectiveness of Sociotechnical Interventions: Antidote or Fad? , 1989 .

[12]  Deborah G. . Ancona.  Outward Bound: Strategic for Team Survival in an Organization , 1990 .

[13]  R. Walton,et al.  From Control to Commitment in the Workplace: In Factory after Factory, There Is a Revolution Under Way in the Management of Work. Readings on Labor-Management Relations. , 1991 .

[14]  Daniel Roos,et al.  The machine that changed the world : the story of lean production , 1991 .

[15]  J. C. Henderson,et al.  Managing I/S Design Teams: A Control Theories Perspective , 1992 .

[16]  George P. Baker,et al.  Subjective Performance Measures in Optimal Incentive Contracts , 1993 .

[17]  N. Brewer,et al.  Supervisory behaviour and team performance amongst police patrol sergeants , 1994 .

[18]  Robert E. Cole,et al.  Different Quality Paradigms and their Implications for Organizational Learning , 1994 .

[19]  Youngbae Kim,et al.  R&D project team climate and team performance in Korea: A multidimensional approach , 1995 .

[20]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry , 1995 .

[21]  Susan Albers Mohrman,et al.  Designing Team-Based Organizations: New Forms for Knowledge Work , 1995 .

[22]  A. Edmondson.  Learning from Mistakes is Easier Said Than Done: Group and Organizational Influences on the Detection and Correction of Human Error , 1996 .

[23]  Nirmalya Kumar,et al.  The power of trust in manufacturer-retailer relationships , 1996 .

[24]  A. Majchrzak,et al.  Breaking the Functional Mind-Set in Process Organizations , 1996 .

[25]  Gerald E. Ledford,et al.  A Predictive Model of Self-Managing Work Team Effectiveness , 1996 .

[26]  최세종.  Southwest Airlines의 성공비결 , 1997 .

[27]  George P. Baker,et al.  Incentives and cooperation: the joint effects of task and reward interdependence on group performance , 1997 .

[28]  Charles R. McClure,et al.  Measuring and managing performance in organizations , 1997 .

[29]  B. Morris.  The Service Profit Chain: : How Leading Companies Link Profit and Growth to Loyalty, Satisfaction, and Value , 1998 .

[30]  J. H. Gittell.  Organizing work to support relational co-ordination , 2000 .

[31]  Jody Hoffer Gittell,et al.  Supervisory Span, Relational Coordination and Flight Departure Performance , 2001 .