Study on China’s Renewable Energy Policy Reform and Improved Design of Renewable Portfolio Standard

China officially implemented the renewable portfolio standard (RPS) on 1 January 2019, and it remains uncertain as to whether this can effectively solve the problem of renewable energy consumption in China and ease the pressure of government subsidies. In order to study the impact of this policy on China’s renewable energy power generation and explore RPS policy that is more suitable for the characteristics of China’s renewable energy, we first develop a revenue function model based on the just released RPS policy to explore the effectiveness of the policy, the feasibility conditions for successful implementation, and the problems that may be encountered during the implementation process. Then, we propose policy recommendations based on the possible problems of the current policy and design an “incremental electricity price” supplementary policy to improve the possibility of successful implementation of the RPS policy. Finally, an evolutionary game model is established to simulate and verify the possibility of successful implementation of the supplementary policy. The main research results are: (1) the essence of the current RPS policy is the comprehensive implementation policy of the RPS and feed-in-tariff (FiT); (2) because of the characteristics of China’s energy structure, the implementation of this policy reform is more resistant; (3) the quantitative research on the revenue function model shows that the current transaction price of the green certificate market is very low, which is not conducive to alleviating the state’s subsidy pressure on renewable energy power generation; and (4) analysis of empirical data shows that the successful implementation of the “incremental electricity price” policy relies on the initial strategies of grid companies and users.

[1]  Khatera Alizada Rethinking the diffusion of renewable energy policies: A global assessment of feed-in tariffs and renewable portfolio standards , 2018, Energy Research & Social Science.

[2]  Zhao Xin-gang,et al.  Evolutionary game analysis on the behavior strategies of power producers in renewable portfolio standard , 2018, Energy.

[3]  Xiaomei Wang,et al.  The Equilibrium Model for the Coexistence of Renewable Portfolio Standards and Emissions Trading: The Supply Chain Analysis , 2019, Energies.

[4]  Tae-hyeong Kwon Policy synergy or conflict for renewable energy support: Case of RPS and auction in South Korea , 2018, Energy Policy.

[5]  Wei Li,et al.  Prospective exploration of future renewable portfolio standard schemes in China via a multi-sector CGE model , 2019, Energy Policy.

[6]  Nikolay Anguelov,et al.  Renewable Portfolio Standards and Policy Stringency: An Assessment of Implementation and Outcomes , 2017, Review of Policy Research.

[7]  Peng Sun,et al.  A comparative study of feed-in tariff and renewable portfolio standard policy in renewable energy industry , 2015 .

[8]  Debin Fang,et al.  Government regulation of renewable energy generation and transmission in China’s electricity market , 2018, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[9]  Changhee Kim,et al.  Do Shifts in Renewable Energy Operation Policy Affect Efficiency: Korea’s Shift from FIT to RPS and Its Results , 2018 .

[10]  Lincoln L. Davies,et al.  Empirical evaluation of the stringency and design of renewable portfolio standards , 2018, Nature Energy.

[11]  Asset Khabdullin,et al.  Modeling the power of renewable energy sources in the context of classical electricity system transformation , 2017 .

[12]  Haitao Yin,et al.  Do State Renewable Portfolio Standards Promote In-State Renewable Generation? , 2010 .

[13]  Chuanwen Jiang,et al.  A review on promoting share of renewable energy by green-trading mechanisms in power system , 2014 .

[14]  Zhao Xin-gang,et al.  From feed-in tariff to renewable portfolio standards: An evolutionary game theory perspective , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[15]  Lu Wang,et al.  Research on low-carbon diffusion considering the game among enterprises in the complex network context , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[16]  Koji Shimada,et al.  Evolution from the renewable portfolio standards to feed-in tariff for the deployment of renewable energy in Japan , 2017 .

[17]  Eunnyeong Heo,et al.  Prices versus quantities: Comparing economic efficiency of feed-in tariff and renewable portfolio standard in promoting renewable electricity generation , 2018 .

[18]  He-rui Cui,et al.  CO2 emissions from China’s power industry: Policy implications from both macro and micro perspectives , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[20]  Ganna Kharlamova,et al.  Renewable energy and security for Ukraine: challenge or smart way? , 2016 .

[21]  Hongzhi Zhang,et al.  Will the tradable green certifications and renewable portfolio standard policy work well in China: A recursive CGE analysis , 2018, Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy.

[22]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  Possible design with equity and responsibility in China’s renewable portfolio standards , 2018, Applied Energy.

[23]  M. Tvaronavičienė,et al.  Energy Efficiency in the Long-Run in the Selected European Countries , 2018 .

[24]  Benjamin C. McLellan,et al.  Substitution effect of renewable portfolio standards and renewable energy certificate trading for feed-in tariff , 2017, Applied Energy.

[25]  Jiang Lin,et al.  Curtailment of renewable energy in Northwest China and market-based solutions , 2018, Energy Policy.

[26]  Z. Tan,et al.  Impact of policy mix concerning renewable portfolio standards and emissions trading on electricity market , 2019, Renewable Energy.

[27]  K Sigmund,et al.  A note on evolutionary stable strategies and game dynamics. , 1979, Journal of theoretical biology.